Conservation Genetics

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 877–887 | Cite as

Co-occurring patterns of endophyte infection and genetic structure in the alpine grass, Festuca eskia: implications for seed sourcing in ecological restoration

  • H. Gonzalo-Turpin
  • P. Barre
  • A. Gibert
  • A. Grisard
  • C. P. West
  • L. Hazard
Research Article


Choosing the provenance of seed used in ecological restoration could entail its success. An alternative approach to examine local adaptation in seed sourcing is the assessment of genetic structure and diversity based on molecular markers. These types of analyses focus on the genetics of the target plant itself and eliminate the genetic influence of associated organisms, such as Epichloë/Neotyphodium endophytes in grasses. By impacting the fitness of their host, such symbionts may influence population genetic structure and diversity. Therefore, seed sourcing for grasses must consider the influence of their endophytes to increase seed translocation success and minimize the risks associated with this practice. To delineate seed zones for restoration of the alpine fescue Festuca eskia Ramond ex. DC. (Poaceae), we assessed population genetic differentiation and diversity patterns in the species including endophyte occurrence along altitudinal and longitudinal gradients in the Pyrenees Mountains. Twenty-three populations were analysed for endophyte status, and three STS and one SSR marker were used to examine genetic differentiation and diversity patterns. Results showed that F. eskia hosts an asexual form of Epichloë and infection frequency within populations decreased from East to West (100 vs. 8–25%). Molecular markers separated F. eskia into two East and West groups, and endophyte infection and genetic patterns were congruent with molecular data. Little evidence for genetic differentiation or difference in endophyte occurrence associated with altitude was detected. Little variation was found in within population diversity, regardless of provenance altitude and site, and/or endophyte infection frequency. The results of this study suggested the establishment of two distinct management units for F. eskia seed sourcing restoration.


Epichloë Endophyte Festuca eskia Population genetic structure Gene flow STS SSR Restoration Seed sourcing 



We would like to thank A. Leuchtmann for examining F. eskia endophyte, P. Laurent who collected samples and conducted endophyte laboratory work, P. Cormenier, C. Gibelin and C. Talon for the genetic laboratory work, I. Till-Bottraud for helpful comments on the manuscript and, A. Ashworth for improving the English text. These results are part of H.G.-T. PhD thesis. This work was funded by Ecovars2 project and INRA-SAD. Ecovars2 is funded by The European Union, the French state and Régions Midi-Pyrénées, Aquitaine and Languedoc-Roussillon.


  1. Baudière A, Geslot A, Chiglione C et al (1973) La pelouse à Festuca eskia en Pyrénées centrales et orientales: esquisse taxinomique et écologique. Acta Biol Acad Sci Hung 19:23–35Google Scholar
  2. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L (2001) GENETIX 4.03, logiciel sous Windows™ pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université Montpellier II, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottin L, Verhaegen D, Tassin J et al (2005) Genetic diversity and population structure of an insular tree, Santalum austrocaledonicum in New Caledonian archipelago. Mol Ecol 14:1979–1989. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02576.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Byars SG, Papst W, Hoffmann AA (2007) Local adaptation and cogradient selection in the alpine plant, Poa hiemata, along a narrow altitudinal gradient. Evol Int J Org Evol 61:2925–2941. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00248.x Google Scholar
  5. Cavalli-Sforza L, Edwards A (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evol Int J Org Evol 32:550–570. doi: 10.2307/2406616 Google Scholar
  6. Cheplick GP (2007) Costs of endophyte infection in Lolium perenne genotypes from Eurasia and North Africa under extreme resource limitation. Environ Exp Bot 60:202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clay K, Holah J (1999) Fungal endophyte symbiosis and plant diversity in successional fields. Science 285:1742. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5434.1742 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Craven KD, Hsiau PTW, Leuchtmann A et al (2001) Multigene phylogeny of Epichloë species, fungal symbionts of grasses. Ann Mo Bot Gard 88:14–34. doi: 10.2307/2666129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839. doi: 10.1007/BF00221895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Faeth SH, Fagan WF (2002) Fungal endophytes: common host plant symbionts but uncommon mutualists. Integr Comp Biol 42:360–368. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.2.360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP: phylogenetic inference package. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  13. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 6:1123–1132Google Scholar
  14. Hiatt EE, Hill NS, Bouton JH et al (1999) Tall fescue endophyte detection: commercial immunoblot test kit compared with microscopic analysis. Crop Sci 39:796–799Google Scholar
  15. Hufford KM, Mazer S (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 18:147–155. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iwata H, Kamijo T, Tsumura Y (2006) Assessment of genetic diversity of native species in Izu Islands for a discriminate choice of source populations: implications for revegetation of volcanically devastated sites. Conserv Genet 7:399–413. doi: 10.1007/s10592-005-9050-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen LB, Muylle H, Arens P et al (2005) Development and mapping of a public reference set of SSR markers in Lolium perenne L. Mol Ecol Notes 5:951–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01043.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones ES, Dupal MP, Kollier R, Drayton MC, Forster JW (2001) Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Theor Appl Genet 102:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller M, Kollman J, Edwards PJ (2000) Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. J Appl Ecol 37:647–659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00517.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knapp EE, Rice KJ (1996) Genetic structure and gene flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): implications for native grassland restoration. Restor Ecol 4:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00101.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koh S, Hik D (2007) Herbivory mediates grass–endophyte relationships. Ecology 88:2752–2757. doi: 10.1890/06-1958.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Körner C (2007) The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22:569–574. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubik C, Sawkins M, Meyer WA, Gaut BS (2001) Genetic diversity in seven perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars based on SSR markers. Crop Sci 41(5):1565–1572Google Scholar
  24. Lauvergeat V, Barre P, Bonnet M et al (2005) Sixty simple sequence repeat markers for use in the Festuca–Lolium complex of grasses. Mol Ecol Notes 5:401–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00941.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lem P, Lallemand J (2003) Grass consensus STS markers: an efficient approach for detecting polymorphism in Lolium. Theor Appl Genet 107:1113–1122. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1308-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1999) Ecological genetics and restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restor Ecol 7:42–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07105.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leuchtmann A (1992) Systematics, distribution and host specificity of grass endophytes. Nat Toxins 1:185–204Google Scholar
  28. Leuchtmann A, Schardl CL, Siegel MR (1994) Sexual compatibility and taxonomy of a new species of Epichloë symbiotic with fine fescue grasses. Mycologia 86:802–812. doi: 10.2307/3760595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leyronas C, Raynal G (2001) Presence of Neotyphodium-like endophytes in European grasses. Ann Appl Biol 139:119–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00136.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malinowski DP, Belesky DP (2000) Adaptations of endophyte-infected cool-season grasses to environmental stresses: mechanisms of drought and mineral stress tolerance. Crop Sci 40:929–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Meijer G, Leuchtmann A (2001) Fungal genotype controls mutualism and sex in Brachypodium sylvaticum infected by Epichloe sylvatica. Acta Biol Hung 52:249–263. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.52.2001.2-3.9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Météorologie Nationale Bessemoulin J (1989) Atlas Climatique de la France. Imprimerie de la Météorologie Nationale, ParisGoogle Scholar
  34. Montalvo A, Ellstrand NC (2001) Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 88:258–269. doi: 10.2307/2657017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Montalvo A, Williams SL, Rice KJ et al (1997) Restoration biology: a population biology perspective. Restor Ecol 5:277–290. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00542.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nieberding CM, Olivieri I (2007) Parasites: proxies for host genealogy and ecology? Trends Ecol Evol 22:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Page RDM (1996) Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version-1.2)—population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  40. Rice W (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evol Int J Org Evol 43:223–225. doi: 10.2307/2409177 Google Scholar
  41. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sachs JL, Simms EL (2006) Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends Ecol Evol 21:585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Saikkonen K, Faeth SH, Helander M et al (1998) Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:319–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saikkonen K, Wali P, Helander M et al (2004) Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 9:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.04.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schardl CL, Leuchtmann A, Spiering MJ (2004) Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:315–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141735 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schonswetter P, Stehlik I, Holderegger R et al (2005) Molecular evidence for glacial refugia of mountain plants in the European Alps. Mol Ecol 14:3547–3555. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02683.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Segarra-Moragues JG, Palop-Esteban M, Gonzalez-Candelas F et al (2007) Nunatak survival vs. tabula rasa in the Central Pyrenees: a study on the endemic plant species Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). J Biogeogr 34:1893–1906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01740.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sullivan TJ, Faeth H (2004) Gene flow in the endophyte Neotyphodium and implications for coevolution with Festuca arizonica. Mol Ecol 13(3):649–656. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02091.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson JN (1994) The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. Torrecilla P, Catalan P (2002) Phylogeny of broad-leaved and fine-leaved Festuca lineage (Poaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. Syst Bot 27:241–251Google Scholar
  52. Turner B, Cairns AJ, Armstead IP et al (2006) Dissecting the regulation of fructan metabolism in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) with locus mapping. New Phytol 169:45–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01575.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Vargas P (2003) Molecular evidence for multiple diversification patterns of alpine plants in Mediterranean Europe. Taxon 52:463–476. doi: 10.2307/3647446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weir B, Cockerham C (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evol Int J Org Evol 38:1358–1370. doi: 10.2307/2408641 Google Scholar
  55. Wesche K, Hensen I, Undrakh R (2006) Genetic structure of Galitzkya macrocarpa and G. potaninii, two closely related endemics of central Asian Mountains Ranges. Ann Bot (Lond) 98:1025–1034. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams SL (2001) Reduced genetic diversity in eelgrass transplantations affects both population growth and individual fitness. Ecol Appl 11:1472–1488. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1472:RGDIET]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354Google Scholar
  58. Zhao QF, Wang GAN, Li QX et al (2006) Genetic diversity of five Kobresia species along the eastern Qinghai–Tibet plateau in China. Hereditas 143:33–40. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01924.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Gonzalo-Turpin
    • 1
  • P. Barre
    • 2
  • A. Gibert
    • 1
  • A. Grisard
    • 1
  • C. P. West
    • 3
  • L. Hazard
    • 1
  1. 1.INRA, UMR 1248 AGIRCastanet-Tolosan cedexFrance
  2. 2.INRA, UR GAPFLusignanFrance
  3. 3.University of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations