Conservation Genetics

, 10:2029 | Cite as

New polymorphic microsatellite loci developed and characterized from edible dormouse (Glis glis)

  • Miroslawa Dabert
  • Artur Jarmolowski
  • Miroslaw Jurczyszyn
Technical Note


Eight new polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated and characterized from the edible dormouse (Glis glis). All loci were polymorphic in the 70 individuals tested. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 6, with a mean of 4. Observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.10 to 0.71 and 0.15 to 0.67, respectively. No evidence of linkage disequilibrium between loci has been found. These eight new loci, plus previously characterized markers, now make it possible to undertake more detailed population genetic studies of G. glis, which is relevant to the preservation of this species.


Glis glis Microsatellite Edible dormouse Endangered species 



The studies were supported by Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University (PBWB 202/00), and were approved by Polish Ministry of the Environment (No. DLOPiK-op/ogiz/IV-20/4455/07/aj).


  1. Dabert M, Pawlak A, Jurczyszyn M, Jarmołowski A (2003) Small-insert genomic DNA library of Glis glis (L.) useful for microsatellite isolation. Biol Lett 40(2):119–123Google Scholar
  2. Hürner H, Martin JF, Ibas AR, Arrizabalaga A, Michaux JR (2009) Isolation, characterization and PCR multiplexing of polymorphic microsatellite markers in the edible dormouse, Glis glis. Mol Ecol Resour. doi:  10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02365.x
  3. Paetkau D (1999) Microsatellites obtained using strand extension: an enrichment protocol. Biotechniques 26:690–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pucek Z, Jurczyszyn M (2001) Glis glis (Linne, 1766) Fat dormouse (edible dormouse). In: Glowaciński Z (ed) Polish Red Data Book of animals. PWRL, Warszawa, pp 79–81Google Scholar
  6. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols in the series methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  8. Storch G (1978) Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766)—Siebenschläfer. In: Niethammer J, Krapp F (eds) Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Akademische Verlagsgeselschaft, Wiesbaden, pp 243–258Google Scholar
  9. van Oosterhout C, Hutchison WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-Checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroslawa Dabert
    • 1
  • Artur Jarmolowski
    • 2
  • Miroslaw Jurczyszyn
    • 3
  1. 1.Molecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland
  2. 2.Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland
  3. 3.Department of Systematic Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations