Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 343–354 | Cite as

Detecting introgressive hybridisation in rock partridge populations (Alectoris graeca) in Greece through Bayesian admixture analyses of multilocus genotypes

  • Marina Barilani
  • Athanassios Sfougaris
  • Alexis Giannakopoulos
  • Nadia Mucci
  • Cristiano Tabarroni
  • Ettore Randi
Original Paper

Abstract

The nominal subspecies of rock partridge (Alectoris graeca graeca) is widely distributed in Greece, where populations are declining due to over-hunting and habitat changes. Captive-reared chukars (A. chukar) have been massively released throughout the country, raising fear that introgressive hybridisation might have disrupted local adaptations leading to further population declines. In this study we used mtDNA control-region sequences and Bayesian admixture analyses of multilocus genotypes determined at eight microsatellite loci, to assess the extent of introgressive hybridisation in 319 wild rock partridges collected in Greece. A neighbour-joining tree split the mtDNA haplotypes into three strongly supported clades, corresponding to rock, red-legged (A.␣rufa) and chukar partridges. We did not detect any case of maternal introgression. In contrast, admixture analyses of microsatellite genotypes identified from four to 28 putative hybrids (according to different assignment criteria), corresponding to 1.2–8.8% of the samples, which were widespread throughout all the country. Power and limits of admixture analyses were assessed using simulated hybrid genotypes, which revealed that a small number of markers can detect all first and second generation hybrids (F 1 and F 2), and up to 90% of the first generation backrossess. Thus, the true proportion of recently introgressed rock partridges in Greece might be ca. 20%. These findings indicate that introgressive hybridisation is widespread, suggesting that released captive-bred partridges have reproduced and hybridised in nature polluting the gene pool of wild rock partridge populations in Greece.

Keywords

Alectoris graeca and chukar Rock and␣chukar partridges Introgressive hybridisation mtDNA Control-region Microsatellites Bayesian admixture analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We deeply appreciated the collaboration of everybody who helped in sampling collection, and in particular: P. Alkon, S. Kark and N. Liu for sampling chukars in Israel and China; D. Dias and J.A. Perez Garrido for red-legged partridges from Portugal and Spain; P. Birtsas, the hunters and Forest Service personnel for sampling in Greece. Fundings for laboratory analyses were provided to ER by the INFS, Ministero per le Politiche Agricole e Forestali, and Ministero per l’Ambiente e la Tutela del Territorio, Direzione Conservazione della Natura. Special thanks to Lars Bach which sent us copy of the software HybridLab, to C. Primmer and two anonymous referees that greatly contributed to improve a first version of this paper.

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton NH (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10:551–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont MA, Rannala B (2004) The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nat Rev Genet 5:251–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2001) GENETIX 4.02, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. http://www.univ-montp2.fr/∼genetix/genetix.htm
  5. Bernard-Laurent A, Auliac P, Douvre P, Guillet D, Normand F, Roche P, Sibut P, Toja S (2001) Risques de pollution génétique des populations de perdrix bartavelle: Bilan d’une enquête sur les lâchers de perdrix rouge dans les Alpes françaises. Faune Sauvage 254:10–15Google Scholar
  6. Boecklen WJ, Howard DJ (1997) Genetic analysis of hybrid zones: numbers of markers and power of resolution. Ecology 78:2611–2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duarte J, Vargas JM (2004) Field interbreeding of released farm-reared red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) with wild ones. Game Wildli Sci 21:55–61Google Scholar
  8. Edmands S, Timmerman CC (2003) Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 17:883–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer J, Lindenmayer D (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal translocations. Biol Conserv 96:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ford MJ (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv Biol 16:815–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garnier S, Alibert P, Audiot P, Prieur B, Rasplus J-Y (2004) Isolation by distance and sharp discontinuities in gene frequencies: implications for the phylogeography of an alpine insect species, Carabus solieri. Mol Ecol 13:1883–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerloff U, Schlotterer C, Rassmann K, Rambold I, Hohmann G, Frutth B, Tautz D (1995) Amplification of hypervariable simple sequence repeats (microsatellites) from excremental DNA of wild living Bonobos (Pan paniscus). Mol Ecol 4:515–518Google Scholar
  16. Gonzalez EG, Castilla AM, Zardoya R (2005) Novel polymorphic microsatellites for the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) and cross-species amplification in Alectoris graeca. Mol Ecol Notes 5:449–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman SJ, Barton NH, Swanson G, Abernethy K, Pemberton JM (1999) Introgression through rare hybridisation: a genetic study of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (genus Cervus), in Argyll, Scotland. Genetics 152:355–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallerman E (2003) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Hallerman EM (ed) Population genetics: principles and applications for fisheries scientist. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 239–259Google Scholar
  19. Handrinos G, Akriotis T (1997) The birds of Greece. Croon-Helm, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Huelsenbeck J, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 8:754–755. http://www.mrbayes.net/ Google Scholar
  21. Johnsgard PA (1988) The quails, partridges, and francolins of the world. Oxford University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Koskinen MT, Hirvonen H, Landry P-A, Primmer CR (2004) The benefits of increasing the number of microsatellites utilized in genetic population studies: an empirical perspective. Hereditas 141:61–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163. http://www.megasoftware.net/ Google Scholar
  24. Lecis R, Pierpaoli M, Birò ZS, Szemethy L, Ragni B, Vercillo F, Randi E (2006) Bayesian analyses of admixture in wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) using linked microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 15:119–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mank JE, Carlson JE, Brittingham MC (2004) A century of hybridization: decreasing genetic distance between American black ducks and mallards. Conserv Genet 5:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marr AB, Keller LF, Arcese P (2002) Heterosis and outbreeding depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population of song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 56:131–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller LM, Close T, Kapuscinski AR (2004) Lower fitness of hatchery and hybrid rainbow trout compared to naturalized populations in Lake Superior tributaries. Mol Ecol 13:3379–3388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Negro JJ, Torres MJ, Godoy JA (2001) RAPD analysis for detection and eradication of hybrid partridges (Alectoris rufa  ×  A. raeca) in Spain. Biol Conserv 98:19–24Google Scholar
  29. Nielsen EE, Hansen MM, Back L (2001) Looking for a needle in a haystack: discovery of indigenous salmon in heavily stocked populations. Conserv Genet 2:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olden JD, LeRoy Poff N, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Fausch KD (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19:18–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perry WL, Lodge DM, Feder JL (2002) Importance of hybridization between indigenous and nonindigenous freshwater species: an overlooked threat to North American biodiversity. Syst Biol 51:255–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potts GR (1989) The impact of releasing hybrid partridges on wild red-legged populations. Game Conservancy Annu Rev 1988:81–85Google Scholar
  33. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly PJ (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. http://www.pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu Google Scholar
  34. Randi E (1996) A mitochondrial cytochrome b phylogeny of the Alectoris partridges. Mol Phylogenet Evol 6:214–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Randi E, Bernard-Laurent A (1998) Introgression of red-legged (Alectoris rufa) allozyme and mitochondrial DNA in rock partridge (Alectoris graeca) Alpine populations: the population genetic consequences of natural hybridization. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:435–444Google Scholar
  36. Randi E, Bernard-Laurent A (1999) Population genetics of a hybrid zone between the red-legged partridge and rock partridge. Auk 116:324–337Google Scholar
  37. Randi E, Lucchini V (1998) Organization and evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control-region in the avian genus Alectoris. J Mol Evol 47:449–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Randi E, Lucchini V, Bernard-Laurent A (1998) Evolutionary genetics of the Alectoris partridges: The generation and conservation of genetic diversity at different time and space scales. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:407–415Google Scholar
  39. Randi E, Pierpaoli M, Beaumont M, Ragni B, Sforzi A (2001) Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids using Bayesian clustering methods. Mol Biol Evol 18:1679–1693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Randi E, Tabarroni C, Rimondi S, Lucchini V, Sfougaris A (2003) Phylogeography of the rock partridge (Alectoris graeca). Mol Ecol 12:2201–2214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridisation and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenberg NA, Li LM, Ward R, Pritchard JK (2003) Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry. Am J Hum Genet 73:1402–1422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubidge EM, Taylor EB (2004) Hybrid zone structure and the potential role of selection in hybridizing populations of native westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) and introduced rainbow trout (O. mykiss). Mol Ecol 13:3735–3749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2002) ARLEQUIN version 2.0. A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology and Ecology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.anthropologie.unige.ch/arlequin
  46. Seehausen O (2004) Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:198–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simberloff D (1996) Hybridization between native and introduced wildlife species: importance for conservation. Wildli Biol 2:143–150Google Scholar
  48. Stephens JC, Briscoe D, O’Brien SJ (1994) Mapping admixture linkage disequilibrium in human populations: Limits and guidelines. Am J Hum Genet 55:809–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Storfer A (1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biol Conserv 87:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Templeton AR (1986) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soulè ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 105–116Google Scholar
  52. Tucker G, Heath M (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series, n. 3, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. Vähä JP, Primmer C (2006) Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Mol Ecol 15:63–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verardi A. Lucchini V, Randi E (2006) Detecting introgressive hybridisation between free-ranging domestic dogs and wild wolves (Canis lupus) by admixture linkage disequilibrium analysis. Mol Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  55. Vilà C, Walker C, Sundqvist A-K et al (2003) Combined use of maternal, paternal and bi-parental genetic markers for the identification of wolf-dog hybrids. Heredity 90:17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regards to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Barilani
    • 1
  • Athanassios Sfougaris
    • 3
  • Alexis Giannakopoulos
    • 3
  • Nadia Mucci
    • 1
  • Cristiano Tabarroni
    • 2
  • Ettore Randi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica (INFS)Ozzano Emilia (BO)Italy
  2. 2.Via Pertini 3, Casalecchio di RenoBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Laboratory of Ecosystem Management and Biodiversity, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural EnvironmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations