Streaked horned lark Eremophila alpestris strigata has distinct mitochondrial DNA
- 145 Downloads
The Streaked Horned Lark (STHL; Eremophila alpestris strigata) is a federal candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act. We evaluated the conservation status and level of genetic diversity of the STHL using the complete mitochondrial ND2 gene. We sampled 32 STHLs from the southern Puget Sound region, the Pacific coast, and Whites Island in the Columbia River of Washington, and additional 68 horned larks from Alaska, alpine and eastern Washington, Oregon, California, and Asia (outgroups). Our Maximum Likelihood analysis of 32 haplotypes identified three geographically concordant clades in Pacific coast states: Pacific Northwest (alpine and eastern Washington, Alaska), Pacific Coast (western Washington, California), and Great Basin (eastern Oregon). Each of the three clades was supported by bootstrap values ≥86%. The distance among them varied from 0.72 to 0.79% nucleotide divergence excluding intraclade variation. The relationship among the clades was not resolved. AMOVA also showed significant structuring of haplotypes among the three clades. Differences among clades accounted for 75.7% of sequence variation, differences among localities within clades accounted for 12.1%, and differences among individuals within localities accounted for the remaining 12.2%. Although STHL populations were closely related to the Californian sample, they appeared unique and isolated. All pairwise F st values involving the STHL samples were significant (except between themselves). STHLs appear to have remarkably low genetic diversity; all 32 STHLs shared the same haplotype. Even with small sample sizes, all other localities had multiple haplotypes. Because the STHL appears to be unique and isolated, and to have little genetic diversity our data suggest it should be a conservation priority.
Keywordsgenetic diversity population genetics status streaked horned lark taxonomy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We are grateful to the University of Washington Burke Museum, US National Museum of Natural History, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, and University of Alaska Museum, for the tissue samples, and to the Burke Museum for access to voucher skins. Lori Harrmann and Mike Westberg provided laboratory assistance. This study was funded by the University of Washington Burke Museum, the University of Minnesota Bell Museum, the University of Alaska Anchorage, and US Fish and Wildlife Service grant 134101J023 to S.F.P. We thank Mark Hopey for assistance locating nests and collecting feather samples and Hannah Anderson for creating Figure 1. Scott Edwards and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments that greatly improved this manuscript.
- Altman B (1999) Status and conservation of grassland birds in the Willamette Valley. Unpublished report submitted to Oregon Dept. Fish and Wildlife, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
- Altman B (2000) Conservation strategy for landbirds in the lowlands and valleys of western Oregon and Washington, Version 1.0, Oregon–Washington Partners in FlightGoogle Scholar
- American Ornithologists’ Union (1957) Check-list of North American birds. 5th edn. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Beason RC (1995) Horned Lark (Eremophila alpestris). In: The Birds of North America (eds. Poole A, Gill F), No. 195. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Beauchesne S, Cooper J (2003) COSEWIC status report on the Horned Lark Stigata subspecies Eremophila alpestris strigata. Status report prepared for the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar
- Behie WH (1942) Distribution and variation of the Homed Larks (Otocoris alpestris) of Western North America. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 46: 205–316Google Scholar
- Bowles JH (1898) Notes on the Streaked Homed Lark. Osprey 3: 53–54Google Scholar
- Browning M (1975) Distribution and occurrence of the birds of Jackson County and surrounding areas. U.S. Museum of Natural History, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Campbell WR, Dawe NK, McTaggart-Cowan I, Copper JM, Kaiser GW, McNall MCE, Smith GEJ (1997) The birds of British Columbia, v. 3, Passerines, Flycatchers through Vireos. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
- Crawford RC, Hall HL (1997) Changes in the south Puget Sound Prairie Landscape. In: Dunn PV, Ewing K (eds) Ecology and Conservation of the South Puget Sound Prairie landscape. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, Washington, pp. 11–15Google Scholar
- Dawson LW, Bowles JH (1909). The Birds of Washington. Occidental Press, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Department of the Interior (2001). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Review of plant and animal species that are candidates or proposed for listing as endangered or threatened, annual notice offindings on recycled petitions, and annual descriptions of progress on listing actions. Federal Register 66(210): 54808–54832Google Scholar
- Drovetski SV, Zink RM, Mode NA, Fadeev IV, Nesterov EV, Koblik EA, Red’kin YA, Rohwer S (unpublished) Phylogeny and phylogeography of rosy-finches.Google Scholar
- Fraser DF, Harper WL, Cannings SG, Cooper JM (1999) Rare birds of British Columbia. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks Wildlife Branch and Resources Inventory Branch, Victoria, British Columbia.Google Scholar
- Gabrielson IN, Jewett SG (1940). The Birds of Oregon. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OregonGoogle Scholar
- Gilligan J, Rogers D, Smith M, Contreras A (1994). Birds of Oregon. Cinculus Press, McMinnville, OregonGoogle Scholar
- Jewett SG, Taylor WP, Shaw WT, Aldrich JW (1953). Birds of Washington State. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- MacLaren PA, Cummins E (2000) Streaked Horned Lark Surveys in Western Washington. Report funded by USFWS.Google Scholar
- Pearson SF (2003) Breeding phenology, nesting success, habitat selection, and census methods for the streaked homed lark in the Puget lowlands of Washington. Natural Areas Program Report 2003–2, Washington Department of Natural Resources., Olympia, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Pearson SF, Hopey M (2004) Streaked Homed Lark Inventory, Nesting Success and Habitat Selection in the Puget Lowlands of Washington. Natural Areas Program Report 2004–1. Washington Department of Natural Resources. Olympia, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Pearson SF, and M Hopey M (2005) Streaked Homed Lark nest success, habitat selection, and habitat enhancement experiments for the Puget lowlands, coastal Washington and Columbia River Islands. Natural Areas Program Report 2005–1. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Rogers RE (1999) The Streaked Horned Lark in Western Washington. Unpublished Report. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
- Rogers RE (2000) The status and microhabitat selection of Streaked Horned Lark, Western Bluebird, Oregon Vesper Sparrow, and Western Meadowlark in Western Washington. Masters Thesis, The Evergreen State College, Olympia WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin ver. 2.000: A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://anthro.unige.ch/arlequin.
- Stinson DW (2005). Washington State status report for the Mazama pocket gopher, streaked horned lark, and Taylor’s checkerspot. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
- Suckley G, Cooper JG (1860). The natural history of Washington Territory. Baillire Brothers, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Towle JC (1982) Changing geography of the Willamette Valley woodlands. Oreg. Hist. Q. 83: 66–87Google Scholar