Conservation Genetics

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 231–240 | Cite as

The origin of Indian Star tortoises (Geochelone elegans) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA analysis: A story of rescue and repatriation

  • A. Gaur
  • A. Reddy
  • S. Annapoorni
  • B. Satyarebala
  • S. Shivaji


The Indian Star tortoise (Geochelone elegans) belongs to the family Testunidae and is distributed in southwest India and Sri Lanka. In addition to facing loss of its natural habitat, the species is also illegally traded as food and as an exotic pet internationally. Here we report DNA-based analyses for identification and repatriation of these tortoises into their natural habitat. We have attempted to establish the geographical origin of these tortoises rescued from smugglers, by comparing the microsatellite and mitochondrial markers of rescued animals with animals of known provenance. Star tortoises exhibited strong genetic structure in India. The populations from western India were genetically distinct at microsatellite and mitochondrial loci from southern populations. The rescued individuals had similar multilocus genotypes and mitochondrial DNA haplotypes as the reference individuals from south India. However, the precise geographic origin of many of the rescued samples remains unresolved, because we could not assign them to southern populations and the Neighbor-Joining cluster analysis indicated that some of rescued tortoises formed distinct clusters. These data strongly suggest that the rescued group of tortoises is composed of a mix of individuals from differentiated source populations that are probably located in southern India and possibly Sri Lanka. Our study provides valuable information based on molecular markers for the assessment of genetic diversity in Indian Star tortoises.


Geochelone elegans Indian Star tortoise microsatellites mtDNA repatriation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We are grateful to Dr. Lalji Singh, for his constant help and inspiration. We are thankful to the Chief Wildlife Warden, Andhra Pradesh and Curator, Nehru Zoological Park, Hyderabad, for permission; Umapathy, Sadanand, Shivaram and Shakeel for their help during sample collection and Arunabala for her help during final analyses. We also wish to acknowledge Dr. K Thangaraj and the three anonymous referees, whose comments and suggestions helped us, improve the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, Central Zoo Authority, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India.


  1. Austin JJ, Arnold EN (2001) Ancient mitochondrial DNA and morphology elucidate an extinct island radiation of Indian Ocean giant tortoises (Cylindraspis). Proceedings of Royal Society of London 268: 2515–2523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker CS, Lento GM, Cipriano F et al. (2000) Predicted decline of protected whales based on molecular genetic monitoring of Japanese and Korean markets. Proceedings of Royal Society of London 267: 1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J et al. (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368: 455–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns CE, Ciofi C, Beheregaray LB et al. (2003) The origin of captive Galapagos tortoises based on DNA analysis: implication for the management of natural populations. Animal Conservation 6: 329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caccone A, Gentile G, Gibbs JP et al. (2002) Phylogeography and history of Giant Galapagos tortoise. Evolution 56: 2052–2066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciofi C, Milinkovitch MC, Gibbs JP et al. (2002) Microsatellite analysis of genetic divergence among populations of giant Galapagos tortoises. Molecular Ecology 11: 2265–2283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Congdon JD, Dunham AE, Van Loben Sels RC (1993) Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): Implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Conservation Biology 7: 826–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G et al. (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origin of individuals. Genetics 153: 1989–2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crumly CR (1982) A cladistic analysis of Geochelone using cranial osteology. Journal of Herpetology 16: 215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel JC (1983) The Book of Indian Reptiles. Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press, Bombay IndiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Das I (2002) A Photographic Guide to Snakes and Other Reptiles of India. New Holland Publishers, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c, Computer programe and manual distributed by the author. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  13. FitzSimmons NN, Moritz C, Moore SS (1995) Conservation and dynamics of microsatellite loci over 300 million years of marine turtle evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 432–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goudet J 2002 FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version – Available from
  15. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 43: 805–811Google Scholar
  16. Iverson JP (1992) A Revised Checklist with Distribution Maps of the Turtles of the World. Privately printed, Richmond, Indiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobson IB et al. (2001) MEGA 2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis Version 21. Bioinformatics 17: 1244–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Minch E (1997) MICROSAT 1.4d A computer program for calculating various statistics on microsatellite allele data. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M et al. (2004) Direct, real-time estimation of migration rate using assignment methods: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Molecular Ecology 13: 55–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Palcovacs EP, Gerlach J, Caccone A (2002) The evolutionary origin of Indian Ocean giant tortoise. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 216–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Palcovacs EP, Marshner M, Ciofi C et al. (2003) Are the native giant tortoises from the Seychelles really extinct? A genetic perspective based on mtDNA and microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 12: 1403–1413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM et al. (2004) GeneClass2: A Software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. Journal of Heredity 95: 536–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 9197–9221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Raymond M, Rousset F (2003) GENEPOP 34 Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249Google Scholar
  27. Roman J, Bowen BW (2000) The mock turtle syndrome: genetic identification of turtle meat purchased in the southeastern United States of America. Animal Conserervation 3: 61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nd edn Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN 2.0. A software for population genetics data analysis. University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Sekhar AC, Gurunathan N, Anandhan G (2004) Star tortoise – A victim of the exotic pet trade. Tigerpaper 31: 4–6Google Scholar
  31. Shaffer HB, Meylan P, McKnight ML (1997) Tests of turtle phylogeny: molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Systematic Biology 46: 235–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shivji M, Clarke S, Pank M et al. (2002) Genetic identification of pelagic shark body parts for conservation and trade monitoring. Conservation Biology 16: 1036–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Storfer A (1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biological Conservation 87: 173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swafford DL (2001) PAUP*: phylogenetics analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Ver 4.0b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 489–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F et al. (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. van Dijk PP, Stuart BL, Rhodin AGJ, ed. (2000) Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of a Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises in Asia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 1–4 December 1999. Chelonian Research Foundation, Chelonian Research Monographs No. 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Gaur
    • 1
  • A. Reddy
    • 1
  • S. Annapoorni
    • 1
  • B. Satyarebala
    • 1
  • S. Shivaji
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Cellular and Molecular BiologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations