Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 132–139 | Cite as

Mate Selection, Meaning of Marriage and Positive Cognitive Constructs on Younger and Older Married Individuals

Original Paper
  • 334 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the role of mate selection, meaning of marriage, meaning of life, quality of life, hope and perceived social support in being married, based on age, gender, ethnicity and educational status. The sample consisted of 632 Iranian individuals who were young or older married individuals. The participants were selected through a purposive sampling method. A demographic questionnaire and six inventories were used. Resulting data demonstrated that individuals who were young had a significantly greater overall scores than individuals who were older married in the areas of mate selection criteria, meaning of marriage, meaning of life, quality of life, hope and social support. Findings did not indicate an influence of gender on these constructs. Significant effects were found with regards to ethnicity and educational level in the meaning of marriage and hope respectively.

Keywords

Marriage Meaning of life Quality of life Hope Social support Gender Ethnicity Education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author is grateful to Dr. Maria Mercedes Ovejero Bruna, Complutense University; for her copy edition in this article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Disclosure

We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing I confirm that I have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.

Ethical Approval

We further confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript.

References

  1. Abela, A., & Walker, J. (2014). Contemporary issues in family studies: Global perspectives on partnerships, parenting and support in a changing world. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, T. L., & Goldsmith, D. (2003). Social support, social networks, and health. In T. L. Thompson, A. M. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 263–284). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bachand, L. L., & Caron, S. L. (2001). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 105–121. doi: 10.1023/A:1007828317271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, T. C., & Snyder, C. R. (2007). Satisfaction with life and hope: A look at age and marital status. The Psychological Record, 57, 233–240.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G.S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82(Supp. 2), S11–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brym, R. J. (1995). New society: Sociology for the 21st century. Canada: Harcourt Brace & Co.Google Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the U.S. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burckhardt, C. S., Woods, S. L., Schultz, A. A., & Ziebarth, D. M. (1989). Quality of life of adults with chronic illness: A psychometric study. Research in Nursing and Health, 12, 347–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotton, S. R. (1999). Marital status and mental health revisited: Examining the importance of risk factors and resources. Family Relations, 48(3), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erchull, M., Liss, M., Axelson, S., Staebell, S., & Askari, S. (2010). Well…she wants it more: Perceptions of social norms about desires for marriage and children and anticipated chore participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghasemi, S. R., Rjabi Gilan, N., & Reshadat, S. (2014). The survey of health-related quality of life in Kermanshah rural women and some related factors. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 24(109), 173–181.Google Scholar
  13. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goode, W. J. (1982). The family. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Hainlen, R. L., Jankowski, P. J., Paine, D. R., & Sandage, S. J. (2016). Adult attachment and well-being: Dimensions of differentiation of self as mediators. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(2), 172–183. doi: 10.1007/s10591-015-9359-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayford, S. R., Guzzo, K. B., & Smock, P. T. (2014). The decoupling of marriage and parenthood? Trends in the timing of marital first births, 1945–2002. Family Relation, 76(3), 520–538. doi:  10.1111/jomf.12114 Google Scholar
  17. Kefalas, M., Furstenberg, F., & Napolitano, L. (2005). Network on transitions to adulthood research network. MacArthur foundation and the network on adult transition. http://transitions.s410.sureserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/kefalasmarriagenorms.pdf.
  18. Krupp, D.B. (2012). Marital, reproductive, and educational behaviors covary with life expectancy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1409–1414. doi:  10.1007/s10508-012-9949-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kubricht, B. C., Miller, R. B., Li, T. S., & Hsiao, Y. L. (2017). Marital conflict and health in Taiwan: A dyadic longitudinal analysis. Contemporary Family Therapy. doi: 10.1007/s10591-017-9404-3.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, S. (1998). Marital status, gender and subjective quality of life in Korea. Development and Society, 27(2), 35–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lopez, S. J., Ciarlelli, R., Coffman, L., Stone, M., & Wyatt, L. (2000). Diagnosing for strengths: On measuring hope building blocks. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of hope theory, measures and applications (pp. 57–85). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Matysiak, A., Styrc, M. & Vignoli, D. (2012). The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings. Population Studies, 68(2), 197–215. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2013.856459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendoza, F. (2014). Marriage and the meaning of life. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
  24. National Marriage Project. (2000). The state of our unions 2000. New Brunswick: National Marriage Project.Google Scholar
  25. Ng, T. P., Lim, L. C., Jin, A., & Shinfuku, N. (2005). Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore. Quality of Life Research, 14(7), 1755–1768.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Onu, F. O., & Armstrong, M. P. (2013). The ideal man: An investigation into qualities that influences mate selection among female undergraduate students. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(1), 80–84.Google Scholar
  27. Oppenheimer, V. K., & Lew, V. (1995). American marriage formation in the 1980s: How important was women’s economic independence? In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen. (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 105–137). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  28. Park, S. S. (2012). The development of the marital attitudes and expectations scale. Master thesis in psychology. Fort Collins: Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  29. Peters, T. P. (1984). The marriage beliefs inventory. Lynchburg: Master thesis in counseling, Liberty Baptist College, B.R. Lakin School of Religion.Google Scholar
  30. Quisumbing, A. R., & Hallman, K. (2003). Marriage in transition: Evidence on age, education, and assets from six developing countries. New York: Population Council, Policy Research Division Working Papers No. 183. http://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/wp/183.pdf.
  31. Ranjit, L., & Mahespriya, L. (2012). Study on job stress and quality of life of women software employees. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2(2), 276–290.Google Scholar
  32. Rezadost, K., & Mombeni, I. (2011). The relationship between late marriage, income, the level of education, and other factors in employed women. Journal of Applied Counseling, 1(1), 105–122.Google Scholar
  33. Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. G. (1990). Social support: An interactional view. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Schessler, K. F., & Fisher, G. A. (1985). Quality of life research and sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider, M. E., & Ward, D. J. (2003). The role of ethnic identification and perceived social support in Latinos’ adjustment to college. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(4), 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shapiro, A., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Marital status and social well-being: Are the married always better off? Social Indicators Research, 88, 329–346. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9194-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simon, M. A., Chen, R., & Dong, X. (2014). Gender differences in perceived social support in U.S. Chinese older adults. Gerontology and Geriatric Research, 3(4), 163–172.Google Scholar
  38. Snyder, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., & Sympson, S. C. (1997). Hope: An individual motive for social commerce. Group Dynamics, 1, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soulsby, L. K., & Bennett, K. M. (2015). Marriage and psychological wellbeing: The role of social support. Psychology, 6, 1349–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strack, K. M. (2007). A measure of interest to logotherapy researchers: The meaning in life questionnaire. The International Forum for Logotherapy, 30, 109–111.Google Scholar
  43. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tseng, C. F. (2016). My love, how I wish you were by my side: Maintaining intercontinental long-distance relationships in Taiwan. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(3), 328–338. doi: 10.1007/s10591-016-9384-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vanagas, G., & Bihari-Axelsson, S. (2004). DO gender differences have influence on psychosocial stress, quality of life and work demands? Cross-sectional study. European Journal of General Medicine, 1(4), 36–41.Google Scholar
  46. Waite, L. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Westrop, K. R. (2002). Building healthy couple relationships: Do communication skills, gender, hope and family type make a difference? Langley: Master thesis in psychology, Trinity Western University.Google Scholar
  48. Willoughby, B., & Carroll, J. (2010). Sexual experience and couple formation attitudes among emerging adults. Journal of Adult Development, 17(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang, W. S., & Yen, P. C. (2014). Single and happier? A comparative study of marital status, socioeconomic security and wellbeing of women in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, 35, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zwang, J. (2004). Perceptions and attitudes towards late marriage and premarital fertility in rural South Africa. Paris: Population Studies & Public Health Université Pierre et Marie Curie.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eghlid Branch, Nursing DepartmentIslamic Azad UniversityEghlidIran
  2. 2.Shiraz BranchIslamic Azad UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations