Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 335–347 | Cite as

Learning and Living Systemic: Exploring the Personal Effects of Family Therapy Training

  • Paul Rhodes
  • Chai Nge
  • Andrew Wallis
  • Caroline Hunt
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite growing recognition that systemic family therapists need to be adept at personal reflection and managing the therapeutic relationship, little research has explored the effects of training beyond the development of skills. This article provides a report on a qualitative study focussed on the personal effects of family therapy training, with particular reference to the aspects of training that foster personal reflection and growth. Twenty three trainees from three training institutions were interviewed, utilizing the practices of grounded theory. Trainees reported a deepening relational awareness, which applied to both personal and professional domains and included shifts in perspectives on relationships with loved ones. Five aspects of training were identified as responsible: (1) personally challenging experiences with clients; (2) supervisors who live the paradigm; (3) the demystification of theory; (4) a safe supervisory space; and (5) the development of trusting peer relationships. Interns also described, in turn, how their personal development affected their clinical work, particularly in the development of compassion and empathy. This study serves to highlight training practices that support reflective practice in systemic family therapy.

Keywords

Family therapy Self of the therapist Personal development 

References

  1. Aponte, H. J., Powell, F. D., Brooks, S., Watson, M. F., Litzke, C., Lawless, J., et al. (2009). Training the person of the therapist in an academic setting. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 381–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asay, T. P., & Lambert, M. J. (1999). The empirical case for the common factor in therapy: Quantitative findings. In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 23–55). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Balantine.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. (1999). Bowen family systems theory and practice: Illustration and critique. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 94–103.Google Scholar
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donnelly, H., & Gosbee, M. (2009). Family of origin supervision in the workplace: Impacts on therapist and team functioning. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flaskas, C. (2004). Thinking about the therapeutic relationship: Emerging themes in family therapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 13–20.Google Scholar
  8. Flaskas, C. (2005). Psychoanalytic ideas and systemic therapy: Revisiting the question ‘why bother?’ Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 26, 125–134.Google Scholar
  9. Flaskas, C. (2007). Systemic and psychoanalytic ideas: Using knowledges in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 21, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flaskas, C. (2009). The therapist’s imagination of self in relation to clients: Beginning ideas on the flexibility of empathic imagination. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gehart, D. R., Ratliff, D. A., & Lyle, R. R. (2001). Qualitative research in family therapy: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 261–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, E. (1993). Family systems therapy: Developments in Milan-systemic therapies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Le Compte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mason, B. (1993). Towards positions of safe uncertainty. Human Systems, 4, 189–200.Google Scholar
  15. Mason, B., Gibney, P., & Crago, H. (2002). Family of origin work in training: Essential or dangerous. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 45–50.Google Scholar
  16. Nel, P. W. (2006). Trainee perspectives on their family therapy training. Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paris, E., Linville, D., & Rosen, K. (2006). Marriage and family therapist interns’ experiences of growth. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 45–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rhodes, P., Wallis, A., & Nge, C. (2008). Can you teach compassion? Context, 53, 44–55.Google Scholar
  19. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. White, M. (2000). Reflections on narrative practice: Essays and interviews. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Rhodes
    • 1
  • Chai Nge
    • 1
  • Andrew Wallis
    • 1
  • Caroline Hunt
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Psychology UnitUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations