Advertisement

Computational Optimization and Applications

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 123–143 | Cite as

Quadratic Convergence of a Primal-Dual Interior Point Method for Degenerate Nonlinear Optimization Problems

  • Hiroshi Yamashita
  • Hiroshi Yabe
Article

Abstract

Recently studies of numerical methods for degenerate nonlinear optimization problems have been attracted much attention. Several authors have discussed convergence properties without the linear independence constraint qualification and/or the strict complementarity condition. In this paper, we are concerned with quadratic convergence property of a primal-dual interior point method, in which Newton’s method is applied to the barrier KKT conditions. We assume that the second order sufficient condition and the linear independence of gradients of equality constraints hold at the solution, and that there exists a solution that satisfies the strict complementarity condition, and that multiplier iterates generated by our method for inequality constraints are uniformly bounded, which relaxes the linear independence constraint qualification. Uniform boundedness of multiplier iterates is satisfied if the Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification is assumed, for example. By using the stability theorem by Hager and Gowda (1999), and Wright (2001), the distance from the current point to the solution set is related to the residual of the KKT conditions.

By controlling a barrier parameter and adopting a suitable line search procedure, we prove the quadratic convergence of the proposed algorithm.

degenerate nonlinear optimization primal-dual interior point method quadratic convergence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.H. Byrd, G. Liu, and J. Nocedal, “On the local behaviour of an interior point method for nonlinear programming,” in Numerical Analysis 1997, D.F. Griffiths, D.J. Higham, and G.A. Watson (Eds.), Longman, 1998, pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.Di Pillo, S. Lucidi, and L. Palagi, “A superlinearly convergent primal-dual algorithm for constrained optimization problems with bounded variables,” Technical Report 02-99, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Universita di Roma “La Sapienza,” Roma, Italy, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.S. El-Bakry, R.A. Tapia, T. Tsuchiya, and Y. Zhang, “On the formulation and theory of the Newton interior-point method for nonlinear programming,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 89, pp. 507–541, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.S. El-Bakry, R.A. Tapia, and Y. Zhang, “On the convergence rate of Newton interior-point methods in the absence of strict complementarity,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 6, pp. 157–167, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Gauvin, “A necessary and sufficient regularity condition to have bounded multipliers in nonconvex programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 12, pp. 136–138, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.W. Hager, “Stabilized sequential quadratic programming,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 12, pp. 253–273, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.W. Hager and M.S. Gowda, “Stability in the presence of degeneracy and error estimation,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 85, pp. 181–192, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Heinkenschloss, M. Ulbrich, and S. Ulbrich, “Superlinear and quadratic convergence of affine-scaling interior-point Newton methods for problems with simple bounds without strict complementarity assumption,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 86, pp. 615–635, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O.L. Mangasarian and S. Fromovitz, “The Fritz-John necessary optimality conditions in the presence of equality and inequality constraints,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 17, pp. 37–47, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.J. Martínez, Z. Parada, and R.A. Tapia, “On the characterization of Q-superlinear convergence of quasi-Newton interior-point methods for nonlinear programming,” Boletín de la Sociedad Matemática Mexicana, vol. 1, pp. 137–148, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Monteiro and S.J. Wright, “Local convergence of interior-point algorithms for degenerate monotone LCP,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 131–155, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.S. Pang, “Error bounds in mathematical programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 79, pp. 299–332, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Ralph and S.J. Wright, “Superlinear convergence of an interior-point method despite dependent constraints,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 25, pp. 179–194, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L.N. Vicente and S.J. Wright, “Local convergence of a primal-dual method for degenerate nonlinear programming,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 22, pp. 311–328, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.J. Wright, “Modifying SQP for degenerate problems,” Technical Report ANL/MCS-P699-1097, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, USA, Oct. 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.J. Wright, “Superlinear convergence of a stabilized SQP method to a degenerate solution,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 11, pp. 253–275, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.J. Wright, “Effects of finite-precision arithmetic on interior-point methods for nonlinear programming,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 12, pp. 36–78, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.J. Wright and D. Orban, “Properties of the log-barrier function on degenerate nonlinear problems,” Technical Report ANL/MCS-P772-0799, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, USA, Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Yabe and H. Yamashita, “Q-superlinear convergence of primal-dual interior point quasi-Newton methods for constrained optimization,” Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, vol. 40, pp. 415–436, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Yamashita, “A globally convergent primal-dual interior point method for constrained optimization,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 10, pp. 443–469, 1998.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Yamashita and H. Yabe, “Superlinear and quadratic convergence of some primal-dual interior point methods for constrained optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 75, pp. 377–397, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematical Systems, Inc.TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical Information ScienceTokyo University of ScienceTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations