Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems

  • Muhammad Ali Butt
  • Faisal Nawaz
  • Saddam Hussain
  • Maria José Sousa
  • Minhong Wang
  • Muhammad Saleem Sumbal
  • Muhammad Shujahat
S.I. : CMKBO

Abstract

The literature on the knowledge management relatively ignores an important concept, the individual knowledge management engagement-the degree to which a knowledge worker is involved with the knowledge management-related activities. This concept is imperative for nurturing the productivity of knowledge workers, knowledge management architecture effectiveness, and innovation. Therefore, this study proposes the mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity between individual knowledge management engagement and innovation. The data were collected from the 330 knowledge workers of IT sector of Pakistan and analyzed using the SmartPLS 3 Version 2.6. The results indicate the partial mediation of knowledge-worker productivity between the individual knowledge management engagement and innovation. The results suggest the pivotal role of individual knowledge management engagement in increasing the innovation and knowledge-worker productivity in the knowledge-based organizations.

Keywords

Individual knowledge management engagement Knowledge management Innovation performance Innovation Productivity of knowledge workers 

References

  1. Allen J, James AD, Gamlen P (2007) Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: a case study using social network analysis. R&D Manag 37(3):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreeva T, Kianto A (2011) Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. J Knowl Manag 15(6):1016–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci 16(1):74–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  5. Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Ruohomäki V, Vartiainen M (2009) Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. J Knowl Manag 13(6):533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera A, Collins WC, Salgado JF (2006) Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17(2):245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carayannis EG, Alexander J, Ioannidis A (2000) Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France. Technovation 20(9):477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardinal LB, Alessandri TM, Turner SF (2001) Knowledge modifiability, resources, and science-based innovation. J knowl Manag 5(2):195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa V, Monteiro S (2016) Key knowledge management processes for innovation: a systematic literature review. VINE J Inf Knowl Manag Syst 46(3):386–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curado C, Bontis N (2006) The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. Int J Learn Intellect Cap 3(4):367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahooie JH, Afrazeh A, Hosseini SMM (2011) An activity-based framework for quantification of knowledge work. J Knowl Manag 15(3):422–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darroch J, McNaughton R (2002) Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. J Intellect Cap 3(3):210–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David FR (2007) Strategic management: concepts and cases. Pearson Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Drucker PF (1998) Management’s new paradigms. Forbes Mag 10:98Google Scholar
  15. Drucker PF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. Calif Manag Rev 41(2):79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du Plessis M (2007) The role of knowledge management in innovation. J Knowl Manag 11(4):20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebert P, Freibichler W (2017) Nudge management: applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity. J Org Des 6(1):4Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez R (2013) The factors determining knowledge worker productivity within the Irish IT Industry (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School). http://esource.dbs.ie/handle/10788/1753
  19. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrido-Moreno A, Lockett N, Garcia-Morales V (2015) Exploring the role of knowledge management practices in fostering customer relationship management as a catalyst of marketing innovation. Balt J Manag 10(4):393–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segras AH (2001) Knowledge management: an organisational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomez CM (2007) Knowledge management and employee productivity, (Master Thesis, San Jose State University). http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3377. Accessed 06 Aug 2017
  23. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strateg Manag J 28(11):1133–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J Acad Market Sci 43(1):115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Honarpour A, Jusoh A, Nor KM (2017) Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1238760 Google Scholar
  27. Hussain S, Shujahat M, Malik MI, Iqbal S, Nawaz FN (2017) Contradictory results on the mediating roles of two dimensions of trust between transformational leadership and employee outcomes. J Org Eff People Perform.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-11-2016-0063 Google Scholar
  28. Inkinen H (2016) Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance. J Knowl Manag 20(2):230–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iranzadeh S, Pakdelbonab M (2014) Investigating the role of knowledge management implementation in labor productivity in Islamic Azad University Tabriz Branch. Prod Manag 7(28):51–74Google Scholar
  30. Jayachandran S, Hewett K, Kaufman P (2004) Customer response capability in a sense-and-respond era: the role of customer knowledge process. J Acad Market Sci 32(3):219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiang X, Li Y (2009) An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: the case of alliances. Res Policy 38(2):358–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kianto A, Vanhala M, Heilmann P (2016) The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. J Knowl Manag 20(4):621–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kivipõld K (2015) Organizational leadership capability–a mechanism of knowledge coordination for inducing innovative behaviour: a case study in Estonian service industries. Balt J Manag 10(4):478–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klingebiel R, Rammer C (2014) Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management. Strateg Manag J 35(2):246–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):833–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee H, Choi B (2003) Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. J Manag Inf Syst 20(1):179–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee VH, Leong LY, Hew TS, Ooi KB (2013) Knowledge management: a key determinant in advancing technological innovation? J Knowl Manag 17(6):848–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lerner D, Amick BC, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cyn D (2001) The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care 39(1):72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin C, Hung HC, Wu JY, Lin B (2002) A knowledge management architecture in collaborative supply chain. J Comput Inf Syst 42(5):83–94Google Scholar
  40. Meroño-Cerdán AL, López-Nicolás C (2017) Innovation objectives as determinants of organizational innovations. Innovation 19(2):208–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Monteiro AP, Soares AM, Rua OL (2017) Linking intangible resources and export performance: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic capabilities. Balt J Manag 12(3):329–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgeson PF, Humphrey SF (2006) The work design questionnaire (WDQ): developing and valiadating a comprehensive measure for job design and nature of work. J Appl Psychol 91(6):1321–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nair N, Vohra N (2010) An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Manag Decis 48(4):600–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Org Sci 5(1):14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Ologbo AC, Nor KM, Okyere-Kwakye E (2015) The Influence of knowledge sharing on employee innovation capabilities. Int J Hum Resour Stud 5(3):102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palacios D, Gil I, Garrigos F (2009) The impact of knowledge management on innovation and entrepreneurship in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries. Small Bus Econ 32(3):291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plum K, Mawson A, Johnson J (2017) Measuring and managing the workplace for knowledge worker productivity. Corp Real Estate J 6(4):336–348Google Scholar
  49. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing andcomparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40(3):879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramezan M (2012) Measuring the knowledge productivity: a comprehensive study of knowledge workers in Iranian industrial organizations. Educ Bus Soc Contemp Middle Eastern Issues 5(3):200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shang SS, Yao CY, Liou DM (2015) The effects of knowledge interaction for business innovation. R&D Manag 47(3):337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shujahat M, Hussain S, Javed S, Thurasamy R, Ali J (2017a) Strategic management model with lens of knowledge management and competitive intelligence: a review approach. VINE J Inf Knowl Manag Syst 47(1):55–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shujahat M, Sousa MJ, Hussain S, Nawaz F, Wang M, Umer M (2017b) Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: the neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity. J Bus Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.001 Google Scholar
  54. Syazwan Abdullah M, Kimble C, Benest I, Paige R (2006) Knowledge-based systems: a re-evaluation. J Knowl Manag 10(3):127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tangen S (2005) Demystifying productivity and performance. Int J Prod Perform Manag 54(1):34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas BE, Baron JP (1994) Evaluating knowledge worker productivity: literature review. Interim Report, No. FF-94/27, USACERL, pp 1–27. www.cecer.army.mil/kws/tho_lit.htm#abs
  57. Tsekouras G, Poulis E, Poulis K (2011) Innovation and dynamic capabilities in a traditional service sector: evidence from shipping companies. Balt J Manag 6(3):320–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tseng FC, Fan YJ (2011) Exploring the influence of organizational ethical climate on knowledge management. J Bus Ethics 101(2):325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turriago-Hoyos A, Thoene U, Arjoon S (2016) Knowledge workers and virtues in Peter Drucker’s management theory. SAGE Open 6(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2004) The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. Eur J Innov Manag 7(4):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wong KKK (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Market Bull 24(1):1–32Google Scholar
  62. Wright M, Tartari V, Huang KG, Di Lorenzo F, Bercovitz J (2018) Knowledge worker mobility in context: pushing the boundaries of theory and methods. J Manag Stud 55(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zheng S, Zhang W, Du J (2011) Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. J Knowl Manag 15(6):1035–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock CampusAttockPakistan
  2. 2.The Department of Management SciencesCOMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock CampusAttockPakistan
  3. 3.CIEO - Algarve University and BRU - Instituto Universitário de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.KM&EL Lab, Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPokfulam RoadHong Kong
  5. 5.The Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong

Personalised recommendations