Skip to main content
Log in

The efficiency of microfinance institutions with problem loans: A directional distance function approach

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the question of whether the inclusion of problem loans leads to any variation in the technical efficiency of microfinance institutions (MFIs). This question has become pertinent as MFIs, which are well known for their excellent asset quality, have been vulnerable to a delinquency crisis worldwide. Traditionally, the efficiency of MFIs has been measured through non-parametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) or parametric stochastic frontier analysis. As both methods are not flexible enough to cover undesirable outputs, we have instead used the method of directional distance function (DDF) that accounts for the joint production of both desirable and undesirable outputs. Using data from 64 large MFIs, this study reveals corroborative evidence that, with the inclusion of at-risk portfolios as undesirable outputs in the efficiency analysis, the scores and rankings of sample MFIs differ significantly from the results of conventional DEA after the use of DDF. MFIs whose numbers of at-risk portfolios are comparatively high have exhibited lower efficiency scores and vice versa. It is therefore critical that MFIs also include problem loans in their efficiency assessment. This would help MFIs get a more accurate picture of their performance as compared to their peers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abate GT, Borzaga C, Getnet K (2014) Cost-efficiency and outreach of microfinance institutions: trade-offs and the role of ownership. J Int Dev 26(6):923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal R, Goodell JW, Selleck LJ (2015) Lending to women in microfinance: role of social trust. Int Bus Rev 24(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akther S, Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2013) Estimating two-stage network Slacks-based inefficiency: an application to Bangladesh banking. Omega 41(1):88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Annim SK (2012) Microfinance efficiency: trade-offs and complementarities between the objectives of microfinance institutions and their performance perspectives. Eur J Dev Res 24(5):788–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assaf AG, Matousek R, Tsionas EG (2013) Turkish bank efficiency: Bayesian estimation with undesirable outputs. J Bank Finance 37(2):506–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos AD (1997) Service quality and operating efficiency synergies for management control in the provision of financial services: evidence from Greek Bank branches. Eur J Oper Res 98(2):300–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassem BS (2008) Efficiency of microfinance institutions in the Mediterranean: an application of DEA. Transit Stud Rev 15(2):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassem BS (2014) Total factor productivity change of MENA microfinance institutions: a Malmquist productivity index approach. Econ Model 39(4):182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benston G, Hanweck G, Humphrey DB (1982) Scale economies in banking: a restructuring and reassessment. J Money Credit Bank 14(4):435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg SA, Forsund FR, Jansen ES (1992) Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980–89. Scand J Econ 94(2):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, DeYoung R (1997) Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. J Bank Finance 21(6):849–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Coate S (1995) Group lending, repayment incentives and social collateral. J Dev Econ 46(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudill SB, Gropper DM, Hartarska V (2009) Which microfinance institutions are becoming more cost-effective with time: evidence from a mixture model. J Money Credit Bank 41(4):651–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Färe R, Grosskopf S, Vardanyan M (2013) Generalized quadratic revenue functions. J Econ 173(1):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes WE (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay M, Mitra SK (2016) Applicability and effectiveness of classifications models for achieving the twin objectives of growth and outreach of microfinance institutions. Comput Math Org Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-016-9237-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon R, Ritchie J, Siwale J (2007) Loan officers and loan ‘delinquency’ in Microfinance: a Zambian case. Account Forum 31(1):47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado S, Molz R (2005) Co-evolution of boards of directors in microfinance organizations: the case of BancoSol and Los Andes. J Dev Entrep 10(2):99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Theory and application of directional distance functions. J Prod Anal 13(2):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh D-W, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econ 126(2):469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka C (2007) Environmental production function and environmental directional distance function. Energy 32(7):1055–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) Measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A 120(3):253–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field E, Pande R (2008) Repayment frequency and default in microfinance: evidence from India. J Eur Econ Assoc 6(2–3):501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii H, Managi S, Matousek R (2014) Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: a disaggregated approach. J Bank Finance 38(1):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2008) Japanese banking inefficiency and shadow pricing. Math Comput Model 71(11–12):1854–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak M (1999) Group lending, local information and peer selection. J Dev Econ 60(1):27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak M (2000) Screening by the company you keep: joint liability lending and the peer selection effect. Econ J 110(465):601–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardone C, Molyneux P, Gardener EPM (2004) Analyzing the determinants of bank efficiency: the case of Italian banks. Appl Econ 36(3):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass C, McKillop DG, Quinn B, Wilson J (2014) Cooperative bank efficiency in Japan: a parametric distance function analysis. Eur J Finance 20(3):291–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Serrano-Cinca C, Mar-Molinero C (2007) Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega Int J Manag Sci 35(2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq M, Skully M, Pathan S (2010) Efficiency of microfinance institutions: a data envelopment analyses. Asia Pac Finance Markets 17(1):63–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartarska V, Mersland R (2012) Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? evidence from rated microfinance institutions. Eur Financ Manag 18(2):218–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes N, Lensink R, Meesters A (2011) Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions. World Dev 39(6):938–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang T, Chiang D, Tsai C (2015) Applying the new metafrontier directional distance function to compare banking efficiencies in Central and Eastern European countries. Econ Model 44(1):188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK (1996) Managing Credit for the Rural Poor: lessons from the Grameen Bank. World Dev 24(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mersland R, Storm RO (2009) Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. J Bank Finance 33(4):662–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester LJ (1996) A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk preferences. J Bank Finance 20(6):1025–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawai N, Shariff MNM (2012) Factors affecting repayment performance in microfinance programs in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 62(1):806–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivares-Polanco F (2005) Commercializing microfinance and deepening outreach: empirical evidence from Latin America. J Microfinance 7(2):47–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal D (2010) Measuring technical efficiency of microfinance institutions in India. Indian J Agric Econ 65(4):639–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal D, Mitra SK (2017) Does the number of borrowers per loan officer influence microfinance institution asset quality? A stochastic frontier analysis. Invest Econ 300(2):81–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Weber W (2006) A note on efficiency and productivity growth in the Korean banking industry, 1992–2002. J Bank Finance 30(8):2371–2386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton J (2007) Technical efficiency in a semi-formal financial sector: the case of Mexico. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(1):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quayes S (2011) Depth of outreach and financial sustainability of microfinance institutions. Appl Econ 44(26):3421–3433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servin R, Lensink R, van den Berg M (2012) Ownership and technical efficiency of microfinance institutions: empirical evidence from Latin America. J Bank Finance 36(7):2136–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriram MS (2010) Microfinance: a Fairy tale turns into a nightmare. Econ Polit Weekly 45(43):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz EJ (1990) Peer monitoring and credit markets. The World Bank Econ Rev 4(3):351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner G, Winkler A (2013) The vulnerability of microfinance to financial turmoil—evidence from the global financial crisis. World Dev 51(11):71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangai DK, Bosire N, Gathago G (2014) Impact of non-performing loans on financial performance of microfinance banks in Kenya: a survey of microfinance banks in Nakuru Town. Int J Sci Res 3(10):2073–2078

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiarto I, Emrouznejad A (2015) Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions: a data envelopment analysis application. Socio Econ Plan Sci 50(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J (2004) Determining management behaviour in European banking. J Bank Finance 28(10):2427–2460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-C (2014) An enhanced DEA model for decomposition of technical efficiency in banking. Ann Oper Res 214(1):167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors remain thankful to the Editor and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments, which have added considerable value to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debdatta Pal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, D., Mitra, S.K. The efficiency of microfinance institutions with problem loans: A directional distance function approach. Comput Math Organ Theory 24, 285–307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9257-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9257-1

Keywords

Navigation