Advertisement

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 229–250 | Cite as

A computational model for human eye-movements in military simulations

  • Patrick Jungkunz
  • Christian J. Darken
Article

Abstract

Models of eye movements of an observer searching for human targets are helpful in developing accurate models of target acquisition times and false positive detections. We develop a new model describing the distribution of gaze positions for an observer which includes both bottom-up (salience) and top-down (task dependent) factors. We validate the combined model against a bottom-up model from the literature and against the bottom up and top down parts alone using human performance data on stationary targets. The new model is shown to be significantly better. The new model requires a large amount of data about the terrain and the target that is obtained directly from the 3D simulation through an automated process.

Keywords

Eye movements Human behavior modeling Eye tracking Target detection Visual search 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buscher G, Cutrell E, Morris M (2009) What do you see when you’re surfing? using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 21–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darken CJ (2007a) Computer graphics-based models of target detection: algorithms, comparison to human performance, and failure modes. J Defense Model Simul, Appl Methodol Technol 4 Google Scholar
  3. Darken CJ (2007b) Level annotation and test by autonomous exploration. In: Proceedings of artificial intelligence and interactive digital entertainment (AIIDE) Google Scholar
  4. Einhäuser W, Spain M, Perona P (2008) Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. J Vis 8:1–26 Google Scholar
  5. Evangelista PF, Darken CJ, Jungkunz P (2010) Modeling and integration of situational awareness and soldier target search. J Defense Model Simul, Appl Methodol Technol 1–19. doi: 10.1177/1548512911415726
  6. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 27:861–874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frintrop S (2006) VOCUS: a visual attention system for object detection and goal-directed search. Springer, Berlin CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36 Google Scholar
  9. Henderson JM (2003) Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn Sci 7:498–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henderson JM, Weeks PA, Hollingworth A (1999) The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:210–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman JE, Subramaniam B (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57(6):787–795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Itti L (2003) Visual attention. In: Arbib MA (ed) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1196–1201 Google Scholar
  13. Itti L, Koch C (2001a) Computational modeling of visual attention. Nat Rev, Neurosci 2(3):194–203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Itti L, Koch C (2001b) Feature combination strategies for saliency-based visual attention systems. J Electron Imaging 10:161–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E (1998) A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(11):1254–1259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jungkunz P (2009) Modeling human visual perception for target detection in military simulations. PhD thesis, Naval Postgraduate School Google Scholar
  17. Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS (1997) Fixation patterns made during brief examination of two-dimensional images. Perception 26:1059–1072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Navalpakkam V, Itti L (2005) Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vis Res 45(2):205–231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pomplun M (2006) Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays. Vis Res 46:1886–1900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rayner K, Pollatsek A (1992) Eye movements and scene perception. Can J Psychol 46:342–376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tatler BW, Baddeley RJ, Glichrist ID (2005) Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time. Vis Res 45:643–659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torralba A, Oliva A, Castelhano MS, Henderson JM (2006) Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychol Rev 113:766–786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Veksler V, Gray W (2007) Mapping semantic relevancy of information displays. In: CHI 2007 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 2729–2734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wainwright RK (2008) Look again: an investigation of false positive detections in combat models. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Naval OfficeRostockGermany
  2. 2.Naval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations