Abstract
Following the Paris Agreement of 2015, most countries have agreed to reduce their carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions according to individually set Nationally Determined Contributions. However, national CO2 emissions are reported by individual countries and cannot be directly measured or verified by third parties. Inherent weaknesses in the reporting methodology may misrepresent, typically an under-reporting of, the total national emissions. This paper applies the theory of sequential testing to design a statistical monitoring procedure that can be used to detect systematic under-reportings of CO2 emissions. Using simulations, we investigate how the proposed sequential testing procedure can be expected to work in practice. We find that, if emissions are reported faithfully, the test is correctly sized, while, if emissions are under-reported, detection time can be sufficiently fast to help inform the 5 yearly global “stocktake” of the Paris Agreement. We recommend the monitoring procedure be applied going forward as part of a larger portfolio of methods designed to verify future global CO2 emissions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the 2020 version of the reports, GCB2020, a new sink term, \({S_{t}^{C}}\), was introduced into the budget equation, which is an estimate of the carbon sink from cement carbonation. The magnitude of this sink is small and here we simply include it in the fossil fuel emission estimates as suggested in Friedlingstein et al. (2020, p. 3277).
We write “\(\overset {P}{\rightarrow }\)” for convergence in probability.
Although, prima facie, α = 32% might seem like a high significance level to consider, a similar threshold is often used by the IPCC, where events happening with a probability lower than 33% are termed “unlikely” (Mastrandrea et al. 2010, Table 1, p. 3). Choosing such a high significance level will facilitate early detection of potential misreporting of CO2 emissions; naturally, it comes with the caveat of a correspondingly high probability of making a Type I error.
References
Anderson TW, Darling DA (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain goodness of fit criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann Math Stat 23(2):193–212
Aue A, Hörmann S, Horváth L, Hušková L, Steinebach J (2012) Sequential testing for the stability of high-frequency portfolio betas. Econ Theory 28(4):804–837
Aue A, Horváth L (2012) Structural breaks in time series. J Time Ser Anal 34(1):1–16
Benford F (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proc Am Philos Soc 78(4):551–572
Chu C-SJ, Stinchcombe M, White H (1996) Monitoring structural change. Econometrica 64(5):1045–1065
Cole MA, Maddison DJ, Zhang L (2020) Testing the emission reduction claims of CDM projects using the Benford’s Law. Clim Chang 160(3):407–426
Dette H, Gösmann J (2020) A likelihood ratio approach to sequential change point detection for a general class of parameters. J Am Stat Assoc 115 (531):1361–1377
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366a):427–431
Dlugokencky E, Tans P (2018) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL). http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html
Duflo E, Greenstone M, Pande R, Ryan N (2013) Truth-telling by third-party auditors and the response of the polluting firms: experimental evidence from India. Q J Econ 128:1499–1545
Durbin J, Watson GS (1971) Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. Biometrika 58(1):1–19
Friedlingstein P, Jones MW, O’Sullivan M, et al. (2019) Global Carbon Budget 2019. Earth Syst Sci Data 11(4):1783–1838
Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jones MW et al (2020) Global Carbon Budget 2020. Earth Syst Sci Data 12(4):3269–3340
Gasser T, Crepin L, Quilcaille Y, Houghton RA, Ciais P, Obersteiner M (2020) Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty. Biogeosciences 17(15):4075–4101
Ghanem D, Zhang J (2014) ‘Effortless Perfection’: do Chinese cities manipulate air pollution data? J Environ Econ Manag 68(2):203–225
Gilfillan D, Marland G, Boden T, Andres T. (2019) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. https://energy.appstate.edu/CDIAC
Gösmann J, Kley T, Dette H (2021) A new approach for open-end sequential change point monitoring. J Time Ser Anal 42(1):63–84
Guan D, Liu Z, Lindner S, Hubacek K (2012) The gigatonne gap in China’s carbon dioxide inventories. Nat Clim Chang 2:672–675
Hakkarainen J, Ialongo I, Tamminen J (2016) Direct space-based observations of anthropogenic CO2 emission areas from OCO-2. Geophys Res Lett 43 (21):11,400–11,406
Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hansis E, Davis SJ, Pongratz J (2015) Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Global Biogeochem Cycles 29:1230–1246
Hinkley DV (1971) Inference about the change-point from cumulative sum tests. Biometrika 58(3):509–523
Horváth L, Hušková M, Kokoszka P, Steinebach J (2004) Monitoring changes in linear models. J Stat Plan Infer 126(1):225–251
Houghton RA, Nassikas AA (2017) Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850-2015. Global Biogeochem Cycles 31:456–472
IPCC (2018) Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C. Technical report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Janardanan R, Maksyutov S, Oda T, Saito M, Kaiser JW, Ganshin A, Stohl A, Matsunaga T, Yoshida Y, Yokota T (2016) Comparing GOSAT observations of localized CO2 enhancements by large emitters with inventory-based estimates. Geophys Res Lett 43(7):3486–3493
Jarque CM, Bera AK (1987) A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int Stat Rev 2:163–172
Korsbakken JI, Peters GP, Andrew RM (2016) Uncertainties around reductions in China’s coal use and CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 6:687–690
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PC, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econ 54(1):159–178
Lai TL (1995) Sequential changepoint detection in quality control and dynamical systems. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57(4):613–658
Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, et al. (2018a) Global Carbon Budget 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data 10(1):405–448
Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, et al. (2018b) Global Carbon Budget 2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 10(4):2141–2194
Ljung GM, Box GEP (1978) On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65(2):297–303
Luderer G, Vrontisi Z, Bertram C, Edelenbosch OY, Pietzcker RC, Rogelj J, De Boer HS, Drouet L, Emmerling J, Fricko O, Fujimori S, Havlǐk Luderer, Iyer G, Keramidas K, Kitous K, Pehl M, Krey V, Riahi V, Saveyn B, Tavoni M, Van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E (2018) Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. Nat Clim Chang 8(7):626–633
Marland G, Rotty RM (1984) Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels: a procedure for estimation and results for 1950–1982. Tellus B 36B(4):232–261
Massey FJ (1951) The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 46(253):68–78
Mastrandrea MD, Field CB, Stocker TF, Edenhofer O, Ebi KL, Frame DJ, Held H, Kriegler E, Mach KJ, Matschoss PR, Plattner G-K, Yohe GW, Zwiers FW (2010) Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Technical report, IPCC Cross-Working Group Meeting on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties
Meinshausen M, Jeffery L, Guetschow J, Robiou du Pont Y, Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Höhne N, den Elzen M, Oberthör S, Meinshausen N (2015) National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership. Nat Clim Chang 5(12):1098–1106
Millar RJ, Fuglestvedt JS, Friedlingstein P, Rogelj J, Grubb MJ, Matthews HD, Skeie RB, Forster PM, Frame DJ, Allen MR (2017) Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. Nat Geosci 10:741–747
Nature (2018) Rules for a safe climate. Editorial
Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41 (1):100–115
Peters GP, Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Friedlingstein P, Ilyina T, Jackson RB, Joos F, Korsbakken JI, McKinley GA, Sitch S, Tans P (2017) Towards real-time verification of CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 7(12):848–850
Ramdas A, Wainwright YFMJ, Jordan MI (2017) Online control of the false discovery rate with decaying memory. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 5655–5664
Ramdas A, Zrnic T, Wainwright MJ, Jordan MI (2018) SAFFRON: an adaptive algorithm for online control of the false discovery rate. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 4286–4294
Reeves J, Chen J, Wang XL, Lund R, Lu QQ (2007) A review and comparison of changepoint detection techniques for climate data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46(6):900–915
Sanderson BM, O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C (2016) What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? Geophys Res Lett 43(13):7133–7142
Schwandner FM, Gunson MR, Miller CE, Carn SA, Eldering A, Krings T, Verhulst KR, Schimel DS, Nguyen HM, Crisp D, O’Dell CW, Osterman GB, Iraci LT, Podolske JR (2017) Spaceborne detection of localized carbon dioxide sources. Science 358(6360)
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464
Tanaka K, O’Neill BC (2018) The Paris Agreement zero-emissions goal is not always consistent with the 1.5°C and 2°C temperature targets. Nat Clim Chang 8(4):319–324
Tokarska KB, Gillett NP (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5°C global warming. Nat Clim Chang 8(4):296–299
Transparency International (2013) Global corruption report: climate change. Routledge, London
UN (2017) Energy statistics yearbook. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energystats/pubs/yearbook/, Technical report, United Nations Statistics Division
UN (2020) Guidelines for the annual questionnaire on energy statistics. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energystats/questionnaire/documents/Energy-Questionnaire-Guidelines.pdf. Technical report, United Nations Statistics Division
UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris agreement. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. Technical report, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
UNFCCC (2018a) Modalities, procedures and guidelines for the transparency framework for action and support referred to in Article 13 of the Paris Agreement. Technical report, Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/APA-SBSTA-SBI.2018.Informal.2.Add_.6_1.pdf
UNFCCC (2018b) Reporting and review under the Paris agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-paris-agreement. Technical report, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
UNFCCC (2018c). https://di.unfccc.int/time_series
UNFCCC (2019) Inventory review reports. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/greenhouse-gas-inventories-annex-i-parties/inventory-review-reports-2019. Technical report, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Unkel S, Farrington CP, Garthwaite PH, Robertson C, Andrews N (2012) Statistical methods for the prospective detection of infectious disease outbreaks: a review. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 175(1):49–82
Zhang D, Zhang Q, Qi S, Huang J, Karplus VJ, Zhang X (2019) Integrity of firms’ emissions reporting in China’s early carbon markets. Nat Clim Chang 9(2):164–169
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Eric Hillebrand, Siem Jan Koopman, three anonymous referees, and participants in the session on “Climate change mitigation, impacts, and adaptation” at the European Geoscience Union (EGU) General Assembly, Vienna, 2019, for many helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript.
Funding
Financial support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark for the project “Econometric Modeling of Climate Change” is acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Availability of data and material
The data used in this paper are freely available online; see https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2020for the GCB2020 version.
Code availability
The MATLAB code used to produce the results of the paper is freely available at https://sites.google.com/site/mbennedsen/research/monitoring.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennedsen, M. Designing a statistical procedure for monitoring global carbon dioxide emissions. Climatic Change 166, 32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03123-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03123-y