Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Climate change coverage in the United States media during the 2017 hurricane season: implications for climate change communication

Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

The United States media does not consistently associate natural hazards and the effects of climate change. Media messages about climate change can influence readers’ perceptions of and reactions to climate risk, and analysis of media messages in various news outlets can have important implications for the beliefs readers hold. We investigate how newspaper characteristics (political orientation, elite status, and proximity to a 2017 hurricane) correspond to the presence, accuracy, and content of climate change coverage occurring in the context of natural hazard articles. We performed a content analysis of hurricane coverage in six US newspapers. The 1057 articles identified from nine constructed week samples were coded for references to climate change, climate denial perspectives, and presentations of climate change consensus and for the use of proximity cues indicating the relative nearness or distance of climate impacts to US readers. Whenever reference to climate change occurred (26.7% of all articles analyzed), all newspapers accurately documented changing trends related to climate change. The conservative newspaper near a 2017 hurricane differed significantly from the other conservative newspapers in frequency of articles explicitly referencing climate change, as well as reference to climate change denial, climate change consensus, and use of proximal and distal proximity cues. This suggests that partisan norms around climate change coverage may be influenced by immediate proximity to a climate-related natural hazard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • AllSides Media Bias Ratings (n.d.) AllSides. Accessed October 14,9. https://www.allsides.com/media- bias/media-bias-ratings

  • Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y (2006) The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. J Exp Psychol 135(4):609–622

  • Battistoli BF, King T, White E (2018) Voices in the storm: the lost discourse of climate change in hurricanes Harvey and Irma. International Journal of Crisis Communication 1:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz A (2004) An overview of social norms theory. In: Lederman L, Stewart L, Goodhart F, Laitman L (eds) Changing the culture of college drinking: a socially situated prevention campaign. Hampton Press, New York

  • Bolsen T, Druckman JN (2018) Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 21(3):389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolsen T, Shapiro MA (2018) The US news media, polarization on climate change, and pathways to effective communication. Environ Commun 12(2):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Chang 14(2):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of mass-media coverage. Geoforum

  • Boykoff M, Roberts JT (2007) Media coverage of climate change: current trends, strengths, weaknesses. In: Human development occasional papers (1992-2997): HDOCPA-2007-03. Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Porgramme (UNDP)

  • Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40(1):72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggemann M, Engesser S (2017) Beyond false balance: how interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Glob Environ Chang 42:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brügger A, Dessai S, Devine-Wright P, Morton TA, Pidgeon NE (2015) Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nat Clim Chang 5(12):1031–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002-2010. Clim Chang 114:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler C, Pidgeon N (2009) Media communications and public understanding of climate change: reporting scientific consensus on anthropogenic warming. In: Boyce T, Lewis J (eds) Climate change and the media. Peter Lang, Oxford, pp 43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S (2007) U.S. elite and non-elite newspapers' portrayal of the Iraq war: a comparison of frames and source use. J Mass Commun Q 84(4):761–776

  • Carvalho A, Burgess J (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Anal 25(6):1457–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu H, Yang J (2018) Taking climate change here and now—mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Glob Environ Chang 53:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church SP, Haigh T, Widhalm M, de Jalon SG, Babin N, Carlton JS, Dunn M, Fagan K, Knutson CL, Prokopy LS (2017) Agricultural trade publications and the 2012 Midwestern US drought: a missed opportunity for climate risk communication. Clim Risk Manag 15:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church SP, Dunn M, Prokopy LS (2019) Benefits to qualitative data quality with multiple coders: two case studies in multi-coder data analysis. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 34(1):2

    Google Scholar 

  • Church SP, Bentlage B, Weiner R, Babin N, Bulla BR, Fagan K, Haigh T, Carlton JS, Prokopy LS (2020) National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 US Midwestern drought. Clim Chang

  • Cody EM, Stephens JC, Bagrow JP, Dodds PS, Danforth CM (2017) Transitions in climate and energy discourse between hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. J Environmental Studies Science 7: 87–101

  • Connolly-Ahern C, Ahern LA, Bortree DS (2009) The effectiveness of stratified constructed week sampling for the content analysis of electronic news source archives: AP Newswire, Business Wire, and PR Newswire. J Mass Commun Q 86(4):862–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt C, O’Neill E (2017) The framing of two major flood episodes in the Irish print news media: implications for societal adaptation to living with flood risk. Public Underst Sci 26(7):872–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M, Wildavsky AB (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 50(5):26–35

  • Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2005) Media bias and reputation. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 11664

  • Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers. Econometrica. 78(1):35–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg MH, van der Linden S, Ballew MT, Rosenthal SA, Leiserowitz A (2019) The role of anchoring in judgments about expert consensus. J Appl Soc Psychol 49:192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC (2016) Public awareness of the scientific consensus on climate change. SAGE Open. Oct-Dec:1–11

  • Hargreaves I, Lewis J, Speers T (2003) Towards a better map: science, the public and the media. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester JB, Dougall E (2007) The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. J Mass Commun Q 84(4):811–824

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.

  • Jones C, Hine DW, Marks ADG (2016) The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Anal 37(2):331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14(2):147–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Vedlitz A, Alston L (2008) Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environmental Science and Policy II:379–393

  • Luke DA, Caburnay CA, Cohen EL (2011) How much is enough? New recommendations for using constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis of health stories. Commun Methods Meas 5(1):76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann ME, Emanuel KA (2006) Atlantic hurricane trends linked to climate change. Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union 87(24):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlon J, Howe P, Mildenberger M, Leiserowitz A, Wang X (2019) Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change. Accessed Yale 360 Climate Communications. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/

  • McCombs M (2004) Setting the agenda: mass media and public opinion. Blackwell Publishing Inc., Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright A, Dunlap RE (2011a) Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change 21(4):1163–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright A, Dunlap RE (2011b) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52(2):155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Media Bias/Fact Check (n.d.) Methodology. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  • Merkley E, Stecula D (2018) Party elites or manufactured doubt? The informational context of climate change polarization. Science Communication 40(2):258–274

  • Methodology (2019) Media Bias/Fact Check. Accessed October 14, 2019. https://ediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology

  • Microsoft Corporation (2018) Microsoft Excel (Version 7). Available at: https://office.microsoft.com/excel

  • Nelkin D (1987) Selling science: how the press covers science and technology. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • QSR International (1999) NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software (Version 12). Available at https://qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products/

  • Rickard LN, Yang ZJ, Schuldt JP (2016) Here and now, there and then: how “departure dates” influence climate change engagement. Glob Environ Chang 38:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffe D, Aust CF, Lacy SR (1993) The effectiveness of random, consecutive day, and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journal Q 70(1):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh S, McComas KA, Rickard LN, Decker DJ (2015) How motivated reasoning and temporal frames may polarize opinions about wildlife disease risk. Sci Commun 37(3):340–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scannell L, Gifford R (2013) Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ Behav 45(1):60–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer MS, Ivanova A, Schmidt A (2014) What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German, and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. The International Communication Gazette 76(2):152–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuldt JP, Rickard LN, Yang ZJ (2018) Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. J Environ Psychol 55:147–153

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117(2):440

  • Trumbo C (1996) Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Underst Sci:269–283

  • Unsworth KL, Fielding KS (2014) It’s political: how the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Glob Environ Chang 27:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGCRP (2017) Climate science special report: fourth National Climate Assessment, volume I. In: Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC, Maycock TK (eds) U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher N (2009) Recovery from disaster: how journalists at the New Orleans Times-Picayune understand the role of a post-Katrina newspaper. Journal Pract 3(2):216–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden S (2015) The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. J Environ Psychol 41:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E (2018) Scientific norms can neutralize the politicization of facts. Nat Hum Behav 2:2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo CJ, Guo L, Amazeen MA (2018) The agenda-setting power of fake news: a big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media Soc 20(5):2028–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg AA, Sjöberg L (2000) Risk perception and the media. Journal of Risk Research. 3(1):31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research. 11(3):351–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KM (1995) Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Communication Review 22:75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanocco C, Boudet H, Nilson R, Satein H, Whitley H, Flora J (2018) Place, proximity, and perceived harm: extreme weather events and views about climate change. Clim Chang 149:349–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Science Education and Communication, Purdue University, 615 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA

    Roberta Weiner & Linda Pfeiffer

  2. Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Traphagen Hall 217, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA

    Sarah P. Church

  3. School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University, 411 N. Central Ave, Suite 550, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA

    Junyu Lu

  4. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., Room 3-328, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA

    Laura A. Esman, Jackie M. Getson, Michelle Fleckenstein, Brennan Radulski, Pranay Ranjan, Emily Usher & Linda S. Prokopy

Authors
  1. Roberta Weiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah P. Church
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junyu Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura A. Esman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jackie M. Getson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michelle Fleckenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Brennan Radulski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pranay Ranjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Emily Usher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Linda S. Prokopy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Linda Pfeiffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Weiner.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiner, R., Church, S.P., Lu, J. et al. Climate change coverage in the United States media during the 2017 hurricane season: implications for climate change communication. Climatic Change 164, 52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03032-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03032-0

Keywords

search

Navigation