Abstract
Media representations of climate change play a critical role in shaping public perceptions and knowledge of climate change. Public understanding of climate change and the responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions are especially important, as these shape social problem definition, in turn influencing policy responses. In this study, we aimed to understand print media discourses on the existence and responsibility for climate change. We contrasted two Global North countries—the USA and Australia—and two Global South countries—India and Nigeria. We examined 600 newspaper articles, randomly selecting 50 articles each from three newspapers in each country. We conducted discourse analysis to examine narratives on climate change existence and who bears responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. We found media from all four countries agreed that climate change was real. Narratives of responsibility, however, varied between countries. In Australia, the primary narrative stated that India and China were responsible for the majority of emissions, while abdicating Australia from responsibility. In contrast in the USA, the primary narrative focused on the country’s own responsibility. In India, the primary responsibility was assigned to the Global North, while in Nigeria, all countries were considered equally responsible for global emissions. We demonstrated that media narratives for climate change responsibility were primarily driven by political discourse. As the majority of the public depends on media for information on climate change, it is essential that narratives of responsibility incorporate scientific evidence and not follow purely political expedient discourses to assign responsibility for action.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.


Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Areia NP, Intrigliolo D, Tavares A, Mendes JM, Sequeira MD (2019) The role of media between expert and lay knowledge: a study of Iberian media coverage on climate change. Sci Total Environ 682:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.191
Beder S (2014) Lobbying , greenwash and deliberate confusion : how vested interests undermine climate change. In: Huang M, Huang R (eds) Green thoughts and environmental politics: green trends and environmental politics. Taipei, Taiwan, Asia-seok Digital Technology, pp 297–328
Billett S (2009) Dividing climate change : global warming in the Indian mass media. Clim Chang 99:1–16
Boden T, Andres B (2014) Ranking of the world’s countries by 2014 total CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement production, and gas flaring. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Available at: https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/emis/top2014.tot [Accessed April 29, 2020]
Bongaarts J, O’Neill BC (2018) Global warming policy: is population left out in the cold? Science 361:650–652
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias : global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Chang 14:125–136
Brüggemann M, Engesser S (2017) Beyond false balance: how interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Glob Environ Chang 42:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
Carvalho A (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst Sci 16:223–243
Carvalho A (2008) Media(ted) discourse and society. Journal Stud 9(2):161–177
Carvalho A, Burgess J (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Anal 25(6):1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x
Corbett J, Durfee J (2004) Testing public ( un ) certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Sci Commun 26(2):129–151
Datt G, Ravallion M (2002) Is India’s economic growth leaving the poor behind? J Econ Perspect 16:89–108
Entman RM (1993) Freezing out the public : elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Polit Commun 10:155–173
Ettema JS (2007) Journalism as reason-giving: deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media ’ s mission. Polit Commun 24:143–160
Feulner G (2015) Global challenges: climate change. Global Chall 1(1):5–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.1003
Friman M, Hjerpe M (2015) Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations. Climate Policy 15(3):302–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.916598
Giddens A (2011) The politics of climate change 2nd ed. Polity Press, Cambridge
Grundmann R (2007) Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics 16(3):414–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701251656
Grundmann R, Scott M (2014) Disputed climate science in the media: do countries matter? Public Underst Sci 23(2):220–235
Gupta J (2010) A history of international climate change policy. Wires Climate Change 1(5):636–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.67
Hallding K, Jürisoo M, Carson M, Atteridge A (2013) Rising powers: the evolving role of BASIC countries. Climate Policy 13(5):608–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.822654
Happer C, Philo G (2013) The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. J Soc Polit Psychol 1(1):321–336. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96
Jaeger MD, Michaelowa K (2016) Global climate policy and local energy politics: is India hiding behind the poor? Climate Policy 16(7):940–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058239
Kramer RC (2013) Carbon in the atmosphere and power in America: climate change as state-corporate crime. Journal of Crime and Justice 36(2):153–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.752252
McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2013) Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Clim Chang 119(2):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
McManus PA (2000) Beyond Kyoto? Media representation of an environmental issue. Aust Geogr Stud 38(3):306–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8470.00118
Nerini FF, Sovacool B, Hughes N, Cozzi L, Cosgrave E, Howells M, Tavoni M, Tomei J, Zerriffi H, Milligan B (2019) Connecting climate action with other sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability 2(8):674–680
Newman (2020) Executive Summary and Key Findings of the 2020 Report. Digital News Report. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/overview-key-findings-2020/. Accessed 13/8/2020
Nisbet MC, Newman T (2015) Framing, the media, and environmental communication. In: Hansen A, Cox R (eds) The Routledge handbook of environment and communication. Routledge, New York, pp 345–358
Nissen S, Wong J H, Carlton S (2020) Children and young people’s climate crisis activism–a perspective on long-term effects. Children’s Geographies :1-7
Parikh JK, Panda MK, Murthy NS (2014) Consumption patterns by income groups and carbon–dioxide implications for India: 1990–2010. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 9(4–6):237–255. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.1997.063338
Parks P (2020) Is climate change a crisis – and who says so? An analysis of climate characterization in major U.S. news media. Environmental Communication 14(1):82–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1611614
Quéré C, Andrew R M, Friedlingstein P, et al. (2018) Global Carbon Budget 2018, Earth System Science Data 10: 2141–2194. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018, 2018
R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing
Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Barnard P, Moomaw WR (2020) World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. BioScience 70(1):8–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
Schäfer MS (2011) Sources, characteristics and effects of mass media communication on science: a review of the literature, current trends and areas for future research. Sociol Compass 5(6):399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x
Schäfer MS, Schlichting I (2014) Media representations of climate change: a meta-analysis of the research field. Environ Commun 8(2):142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.914050
Schellnhuber HJ (2008) Global warming: stop worrying, start panicking? Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(38):14239–14240
Schmidt A, Ivanova A, Schäfer MS (2013) Media attention for climate change around the world: a comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Glob Environ Chang 25:1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020
Shahbaz M, Bhattacharya M, Ahmed K (2017) CO2 emissions in Australia: economic and non-economic drivers in the long-run. Appl Econ 49(13):1273–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1217306
Stephenson S (2010) Jobs, justice, climate: conflicting state obligations in the International Human Rights and Climate Change Regimes. Ottawa Law Review 42(155)
Tranter B (2011) Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia. Environmental Politics 20(1):78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.538167
Trumbo C (1996) Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Underst Sci 5(3):269–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/006
Van Aelst P, Brants K, Van Praag P et al (2008) The fourth estate as a superpower? Journal Stud 9(4):494–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802114134
Vardoulakis S, Marks G, Abramson MJ (2020) Lessons learned from the Australian bushfires: climate change, air pollution, and public health. JAMA Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0703
Weingart P, Engels A, Pansegrau P (2000) Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Underst Sci 9(3):261–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
Wilson K (2000) Communicating climate change through the media: predictions, politics, and perceptions of risk. In: Allan S, Adam B, Carter C (eds) Environmental risks and the media. Routledge, London, pp 201–217
Young N, Coutinho A (2013) Government, anti-reflexivity, and the construction of public ignorance about climate change: Australia and Canada compared. Global Environmental Politics 13(2):89–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00168
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Seema Mundoli for her insightful inputs.
Funding
This study was funded by Azim Premji University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ranjini Murali—conceptualized the study, coded articles, analyzed results, and prepared the manuscript.
Aishwarya Kuwar—undertook web scraping to access the articles needed for this study and coded articles.
Harini Nagendra—conceptualized the study and prepared the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murali, R., Kuwar, A. & Nagendra, H. Who’s responsible for climate change? Untangling threads of media discussions in India, Nigeria, Australia, and the USA. Climatic Change 164, 51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03031-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03031-1