Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating sea-level rise vulnerability assessments in the USA

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many coastal communities around the world are increasingly faced with pressure from sea level rise (SLR). Adapting to the impacts of SLR is now considered inevitable. Many coastal communities in the USA have started to invest in vulnerability assessments that seek to identify the degree of future risk induced by SLR and key vulnerable sectors as well as to provide a sound factual basis for designing and implementing adaptations. However, no study has systematically analyzed the content of these emerging assessments and their quality. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating 64 SLR vulnerability assessments in the USA using an established multi-criteria evaluation framework and by identifying governance factors that affect assessment quality. This study is the first baseline study to understand how the vulnerability of SLR has been assessed by US governments and, more importantly, shed light on pathways for their future improvement. Our analysis finds that the content and quality of the existing assessments vary widely. One-sided assessments that only consider physical exposure are common, and most assessments do not include plans for adaptations. The wealth of the area, amount of funding, mainstreaming efforts, and public awareness are all positively correlated with the assessment quality. We also find that assessments primarily authored by planning staff are lower in quality than those conducted through collaboration. Our findings offer comparative, empirical knowledge for urban planners and coastal managers to improve future vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning for SLR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskog H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation—a question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28(2):276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer WC (1997) General plan evaluation criteria: an approach to making better plans. J Am Plan Assoc 63(3):329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker I, Peterson A, Brown G, McAlpine C (2012) Local government response to the impacts of climate change: an evaluation of local climate adaptation plans. Landsc Urban Plan 107(2):127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baynham M, Stevens M (2014) Are we planning effectively for climate change? An evaluation of official community plans in British Columbia. J Environ Plan Manag 57(4):557–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benioff, R., Guill, S., & Lee, J. (Eds.). (2012). Vulnerability and adaptation assessments: an international handbook (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media

  • Berke PR (1996) Enhancing plan quality: evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. J Environ Plan Manag 39(1):79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Godschalk D (2009) Searching for the good plan: a meta-analysis of plan quality studies. J Plan Lit 23(3):227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Backhurst M, Day M, Ericksen N, Laurian L, Crawford J, Dixon J (2006) What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33(4):581–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Smith G, Lyles W (2012) Planning for resiliency: evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act. Natural Hazards Review 13(2):139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Cooper J, Aminto M, Grabich S, Horney J (2014) Adaptive planning for disaster recovery and resiliency: an evaluation of 87 local recovery plans in eight states. J Am Plan Assoc 80(4):310–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek GR, Klostermann JE, Termeer CJ, Kabat P (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Chang 13(5):1119–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD (2003) Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. J Plan Educ Res 23(2):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD, Godschalk DR, Burby RJ (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices. J Am Plan Assoc 69(3):245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD, Kang JE, Bernhardt S (2010) Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: the role of organizational capacity. Nat Hazards 52(1):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch S (2010) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 20(2):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton P, Mustelin J (2013) Planning for climate change: is greater public participation the key to success? Urban Policy Res 31(4):399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JG, Cavan G, Connelly A, Guy S, Handley J, Kazmierczak A (2015) Climate change and the city: building capacity for urban adaptation. Prog Plan 95:1–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council MM (2005) Natural hazard mitigation saves: an independent study to assess the future savings from mitigation activities. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC 68

  • Downing TE, Patwardhan A, Klein RJ, Mukhala E, Stephen L, Winograd M, Ziervogel G (2005) Assessing vulnerability for climate adaptation. Cambridge University Press

  • Eisenack K, Moser SC, Hoffmann E, Klein RJ, Oberlack C, Pechan A et al (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4(10):867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom JA, Moser SC (2014) Identifying and overcoming barriers in urban climate adaptation: case study findings from the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. Urban Clim 9:54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezer T, Atkinson LP (2014) Accelerated flooding along the US East Coast: on the impact of sea-level rise, tides, storms, the Gulf stream, and the North Atlantic oscillations. Earth’s Future 2(8):362–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2007) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Pol 7(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier TG, Wood N, Yarnal B, Bauer DH (2010) Influence of potential sea level rise on societal vulnerability to hurricane storm-surge hazards, Sarasota County, Florida. Appl Geogr 30(4):490–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Peng Z (2019) Assessing the sea-level rise vulnerability in coastal communities: A case study in the Tampa Bay Region, US. Cities 88:144–154

  • Fu X, Tang Z (2013) Planning for drought-resilient communities: an evaluation of local comprehensive plans in the fastest growing counties in the US. Cities 32:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Gomaa M, Deng Y, Peng ZR (2017) Adaptation planning for sea level rise: a study of US coastal cities. J Environ Plan Manag 60(2):249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM (2007a) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2(2):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM (2007b) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17(2):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM, Klein RJ (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75(3):301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamin EM, Gurran N, Emlinger AM (2014) Barriers to municipal climate adaptation: examples from coastal Massachusetts’ smaller cities and towns. J Am Plan Assoc 80(2):110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AL, Heery EC, Maroon E, McLaskey AK, Stawitz CC (2018) The role of scientific expertise in local adaptation to projected sea level rise. Environ Sci Pol 87:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes M, Tangney P, Reis K, Grant-Smith D, Heazle M, Bosomworth K, Burton P (2015) Towards networked governance: improving interagency communication and collaboration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia. J Environ Plan Manag 58(5):757–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann A, Barnett J, Fincher R, Osbaldiston N, Mortreux C, Graham S (2014) Urban planning and sustainable adaptation to sea-level rise. Landsc Urban Plan 126:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1992) A common methodology for assessing vulnerability to sea level rise. 2nd revision. In: global climate change and the rising challenge of the sea. IPCC CZMS. Ministry of Transport, public works and water management, the Hague, the Netherlands, appendix C

  • IPCC (2014a) Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1132 pp.

  • IPCC (2014b) Annex II: Glossary [Agard, J., E.L.F. Schipper, J. Birkmann, M. Campos, C. Dubeux, Y. Nojiri, L. Olsson, B. Osman-Elasha, M. Pelling, M.J. Prather, M.G. Rivera-Ferre, O.C. Ruppel, A. Sallenger, K.R. Smith, A.L. St. Clair, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, and T.E. Bilir (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R., C.B. Field, D.J. Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1757–1776

  • Juhola S (2010) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: the case of multi-level governance in Finland, In Developing adaptation policy and practice in Europe: Multi-level governance of climate change (pp. 149–187). Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJ, Nicholls RJ (1999) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio:182–187

  • Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications

  • Lund DH, Sehested K, Hellesen T, Nellemann V (2012) Climate change adaptation in Denmark: enhancement through collaboration and meta-governance? Local Environ 17(6–7):613–628

  • Lyles W, Berke P, Smith G (2014a) Do planners matter? Examining factors driving incorporation of land use approaches into hazard mitigation plans. J Environ Plan Manag 57(5):792–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles W, Berke P, Smith G (2014b) A comparison of local hazard mitigation plan quality in six states, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 122:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan AK, Schipper ELF, Burkett M, Bharwani S, Burton I, Eriksen S et al (2016) Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 7(5):646–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell G, Ford J, Jones J (2016) Community-level climate change vulnerability research: trends, progress, and future directions. Environ Res Lett 11(3):033001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(8):889–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno A, Becken S (2009) A climate change vulnerability assessment methodology for coastal tourism. J Sustain Tour 17(4):473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ (2011) Planning for the impacts of sea level rise. Oceanography 24(2):144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A (2010) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328(5985):1517–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien K, Eriksen SE, Schjolden A, & Nygaard LP (2004) What's in a word? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. CICERO Working Paper. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/192322

  • Pelling M (2010) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge

  • Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ Plan A 40(4):867–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2011) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(4):407–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauken T, Mydske PK, Winsvold M (2015) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation at the local level. Local Environ 20(4):408–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Solecki W (2014) Hurricane Sandy and adaptation pathways in New York: lessons from a first-responder city. Glob Environ Chang 28:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarzynski A (2015) Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Clim 14:52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selin H, VanDeveer SD (2011) Climate change regionalism in North America. Rev Policy Res 28(3):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J et al (2009) Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Chang 19(4):447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi L (2017) A new climate for regionalism: metropolitan experiments in climate change adaptation. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve CM, Kelman I (2014) Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. Int J Disast Risk Reduct 10:213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MR (2013) Evaluating the quality of official community plans in southern British Columbia. J Plan Educ Res 33(4):471–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MR, Lyles W, Berke PR (2014) Measuring and reporting intercoder reliability in plan quality evaluation research. J Plan Educ Res 34(1):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Z, Brody SD, Quinn C, Chang L, Wei T (2010) Moving from agenda to action: evaluating local climate change action plans. J Environ Plan Manag 53(1):41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RS, Klein RJ, Nicholls RJ (2008) Towards successful adaptation to sea-level rise along Europe's coasts. J Coast Res:432–442

  • Tompkins EL, Few R, Brown K (2008) Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J Environ Manag 88(4):1580–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2011) Assessing the costs and benefits of adaptation options: an overview of approaches. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/pub_nwp_costs_benefits_adaptation.pdf

  • Walsh KJE, Betts H, Church J, Pittock AB, McInnes KL, Jackett DR, McDougall TJ (2004) Using sea level rise projections for urban planning in Australia. J Coast Res:586–598

  • Wang B, Pan SY, Ke RY, Wang K, Wei YM (2014) An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on web of science database. Nat Hazards 74(3):1649–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JE, Iwamura T, Butt N (2013) Mapping vulnerability and conservation adaptation strategies under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3(11):989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler SM (2008) State and municipal climate change plans: the first generation. J Am Plan Assoc 74(4):481–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S (2012) Vulnerability and risk: comparing assessment approaches. Nat Hazards 61(3):1099–1113

  • Woodruff SC, Stults M (2016) Numerous strategies but limited implementation guidance in US local adaptation plans. Nat Clim Chang 6(8):796–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban Studies Institute, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Xinyu Fu

  2. International Center for Adaptation Planning and Design, College of Design, Construction & Planning, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Xinyu Fu & Zhong-Ren Peng

  3. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Bowen Sun

  4. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Design, Construction & Planning, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Kathryn Frank

  5. China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Zhong-Ren Peng

Authors
  1. Xinyu Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bowen Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathryn Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhong-Ren Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyu Fu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 3 Sea-level rise vulnerability assessment evaluation matrix
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 4 Research sample list
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, X., Sun, B., Frank, K. et al. Evaluating sea-level rise vulnerability assessments in the USA. Climatic Change 155, 393–415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02488-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02488-5

Search

Navigation