This research explores the agent dynamics, learning processes, and enabling conditions for the implementation of microscale win-win solutions that contribute to energy poverty eradication and climate resilience in a selection of low-income rural and peri-urban communities in India, Indonesia, and South Africa. We define these micro-solutions as energy-related interventions and resilience services or products—used at community, household, small production unit, or business level—that yield both economic and climatic gains. Our analysis identifies five elements critical for the robust design of these interventions: (i) The ability to collaborate and share different kinds of expertise with a range of networks operating at multiple levels of activity; (ii) The application of place-based systems-learning perspectives that enable project participants to integrate different types of solutions to meet different needs at the same time; (iii) The ability to yield tangible short-term benefits as part of long-term strategic visions and commitment; (iv) The use of novel technologies and financial instruments in ways that foreground the needs of poor populations; and (v) The inclusion and empowerment of economically marginalised groups through institutional and technological innovations and responsible business models. We conclude that the most critical aspect of successful micro win-win solutions is support for communities’ own endogenous transformative capacities as this helps ensure that solutions are shared and continuously adapted to changing conditions over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
See the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index at https://ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/; for instance, in South Africa, some informal settlements have state-subsidised access to municipal electricity.
A related concept is the ‘no regrets option’ (see http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/index.php?idp=292). However, in contrast to this concept, we do not assume a single economic equilibrium producing inevitable trade-offs between economic growth and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, or that any economy operates at its optimal level. The notion of win-win solutions, especially at a micro level and in poor and informal contexts, assumes the existence of multiple equilibria and much room in which it is possible to achieve higher levels of economic growth and meaningful reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (Jaeger et al. 2012).
See the supplementary material for more detailed descriptions of each case.
The Kruistementvlei Integrated Organic Farm in South Africa is a good example of how integrated learning is contributing to community empowerment while promoting renewable energy use, environmental health, and organic food production.
During the first GREEN-WIN workshop, see www.barefootcollege.org
Agoramoorthy G, Hsu MJ (2016) Small dams revive dry rivers and mitigate local climate change in India’s drylands. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manage 8:271–285
Ahlborg H, Sjöstedt M (2015) Small-scale hydropower in Africa: socio-technical designs for renewable energy in Tanzanian villages. Energy Res Soc Sci 5:20–33
Anenberg SC, Balakrishnan K, Jetter J, Masera O, Mehta S, Moss J et al (2013) Cleaner cooking solutions to achieve health, climate, and economic cobenefits. Environ Sci Technol 47:3944–3952
Bhide A, Rodriguez Monroy C (2011) Energy poverty: a special focus on energy poverty in India and renewable energy technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(2):1057–1066
Brown D, McGranahan G (2016) The urban informal economy, local inclusion and achieving a global green transformation. Habitat Int 53:97–105
Chandra A, McNamara KE, Dargusch P (2017) Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings. Clim Pol 18(4):526–541
GNESD (2013) Energy poverty in development countries’ urban poor communities. Assessments and recommendations. Country report 2013. Case Study South Africa. UCT South Africa & Riso Centre, Denmark
Granoff I, Eis J, MacFarland W, Hoy C, Watson C, de Battista G et al (2015) Zero poverty, zero emissions: eradicating extreme poverty in the climate crisis. ODI, London
Gupta AK (2016) Grassroots innovation: minds on the margin are not marginal minds. Random House India, Gurgaon
Gupta J, Pouw N (2017) Towards a trans-disciplinary conceptualization of inclusive development. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 24:96–103
Guruswamy L (2011) Energy poverty. Annu Rev Env Resour 36(1):139–161
Haider LJ, Boonstra WJ, Peterson GD, Schlüter M (2017) Traps and sustainable development in rural areas: a review. World Dev 101:311–332
Halff A, Sovacool BK, Rozhon J (2014) Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions. OUP, Oxford
Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L, Fay M, Kane T, Narloch U et al (2016) Shock waves: managing the impacts of climate change on poverty. World Bank, Washington DC
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2017) WEO-2017 special report: energy access outlook. https://webstore.iea.org/weo-2017-special-report-energy-access-outlook
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. CUP, Cambridge
Jaeger CC, Hasselmann K, Leipold G, Mangalagiu D, Tàbara JD (2012) Reframing the problem of climate change: from zero sum game to win-win solutions. Earthscan. Oxford, New York
Khandker SR, Barnes DF, Samad HA (2010) Energy poverty in rural and urban India: are the energy poor also income poor. World Bank, Washington DC
Lade SJ, Haider LJ, Engström G, Schlüter M (2017) Resilience offers escape from trapped thinking on poverty alleviation. Sci Adv 3(e1603043):1–11
Leichenko R, Silva JA (2014) Climate change and poverty: vulnerability, impacts, and alleviation strategies. Climate Change 5:539–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.287
Marshall F, Dolley J, Priya R (2018) Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability: enhancing propoor transformative agency in periurban contexts. Ecol Soc 23(3):8
Muttarak R, Lutz W (2014) Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change? Ecol Soc 19(1):42
Olsson L, Opondo M, Tschakert P et al. (2014) Livelihoods and poverty. In: IPCC, climate change 2014: impacts adaptation and vulnerability. CUP, Cambridge, pp 793–832
Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups 2ed. Mass. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Pachauri S, Spreng D (2011) Measuring and monitoring energy poverty. Energy Policy 39:7497–7504
Pereira LM, Karpouzoglou T, Frantzeskaki N, Olsson P (2018) Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 23(4):32
Pieterse E (2008) City futures: confronting the crisis of urban development. UCT press, Cape Town
Pradhan A, Chan C, Roul PK, Halbrendt J, Sipes B (2018) Potential of conservation agriculture for climate change adaptation and food security under rainfed uplands of India: a transdisciplinary approach. Agric Syst 163:27–35
Rasul G, Sharma B (2016) The nexus approach to water-energy-food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Clim Pol 16:682–702
Shackleton S, Ziervogel G, Sallu S, Gill T, Tschakert P (2015) Why is socially-just climate change adaptation in sub-Saharan Africa so challenging? A review of barriers identified from empirical cases. Climate Change 6:321–344
Sovacool BK (2012) The political economy of energy poverty: a review of key challenges. Energy Sustain Dev 16(3):272–282
Spagnoletti B, O’Callaghan T (2013) Let there be light: a multi-actor approach to alleviating energy poverty in Asia. Energy Policy 63:738–746
Speranza CI, Wiesmann U, Rist S (2014) An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics. Glob Environ Chang 28:109–119
Tàbara JD, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecol Soc 12(2):3
Tàbara JD, Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Pedde S, Lamperti F, Kok K, Christensen JH Jäger J, Berry P (2018) Positive tipping points for a rapidly warming world. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 31:120–129
Takama T, Setyani P, Aldrian E (2015) Climate change vulnerability to rice paddy production in Bali, Indonesia. In: Lael Filho W (ed) Handbook of climate change adaptation. Springer, Berlin, pp 1731–1757
Tosun J, Schoenefeld JJ (2017) Collective climate action and networked climate governance Climate Change 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.440
UN (United Nations) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, a synthesis for policy makers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf
UNEP (2015a). Human development report 2015. UNEP. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Human+development+report+2015
UNEP (2015b) Eradicating poverty through an inclusive green economy: UNEP post-2015. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/eradicating-poverty-through-inclusive-green-economy-unep-post-2015-note-6
UNIDO EIFA, ADA IIASA (2017) Sustainable energy for the implementation of the SDGs and the Paris Agreement. Vienna International Centre, Vienna
We would like to thank all participants to the workshops held in India, Indonesia and South Africa. This paper benefited from the thoughtful comments of two anonymous reviewers.
This research is part of the EU-funded H2020 project GREEN-WIN—Green Growth and Win-Win Strategies for Sustainable Climate Action (Grant Agreement No 642018; www.green-win-project.eu).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of a Special Issue on Win-Win Solutions to Climatic Change edited by Diana Mangalagiu, Alexander Bisaro, Jochen Hinkel and Joan David Tàbara
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Tàbara, J.D., Takama, T., Mishra, M. et al. Micro-solutions to global problems: understanding social processes to eradicate energy poverty and build climate-resilient livelihoods. Climatic Change 160, 711–725 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02448-z