Uncertainty representations of mean sea-level change: a telephone game?
- 1k Downloads
For the long-term management of coastal flood risks, investment and policy strategies need to be developed in light of the full range of uncertainties associated with mean sea-level rise (SLR). This, however, remains a challenge due to deep uncertainties involved in SLR assessments, many ways of representing uncertainties and a lack of common terminology for referring to these. To contribute to addressing these limitations, this paper first develops a typology of representations of SLR uncertainty by categorising these at three levels: (i) SLR scenarios versus SLR predictions, (ii) the type of variable that is used to represent SLR uncertainty, and (iii) partial versus complete uncertainty representations. Next, it is analysed how mean SLR uncertainty is represented and how representations are converted within the following three strands of literature: SLR assessments, impact assessments and decision analyses. We find that SLR assessments mostly produce partial or complete precise probabilistic scenarios. The likely ranges in the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are a noteworthy example of partial imprecise probabilistic scenarios. SLR impact assessments and decision analyses mostly use deterministic scenarios. In conversions of uncertainty representations, a range of arbitrary assumptions are made, for example on functional forms of probability distributions and relevant confidence levels. The loss of quality and the loss of information can be reduced by disregarding deterministic and complete precise probabilistic predictions for decisions with time horizons of several decades or centuries and by constructing imprecise probabilistic predictions and using these in approaches for robust decision-making.
We thank three anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments.
This work was supported in part through grant SEASCAPE from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of the Special Priority Program (SPP)-1889 “Regional Sea Level Change and Society”. We thankfully acknowledge funding from the Horizon 2020 RISES-AM project (Grant 603396), GREEN-WIN project (Grant 642018) and Project INSeaPTION. The latter is part of ERA4CS, an ERA-NET initiated by JPI Climate, and funded by BMBF (DE), MINECO (ES), NOW (NL) and ANR (FR) with co-funding by the European Union (Grant 690462).
- Antonioli F, Anzidei M, Amorosi A, Lo Presti V, Mastronuzzi G, Deiana G, De Falco G, Fontana A, Fontolan G, Lisco S, Marsico A, Moretti M, Orru PE, Sannino GM, Serpelloni E, Vecchio A (2017) Sea-level rise and potential drowning of the Italian coastal plains: flooding risk scenarios for 2100. Quat Sci Rev 158:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ben-Haim Y (2006) Info-gap decision theory: decisions under severe uncertainty, Second edn. Academic Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, Gregory JM, Jevrejeva S, Levermann A, Merrifield MA, Milne GA, Nerem RS, Nunn PD, Payne AJ, Pfeffer WT, Stammer D, Unnikrishnan AS (2013a) Sea level change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, Gregory JM, Jevrejeva S, Levermann A, Merrifield MA, Milne GA, Nerem RS, Nunn PD, Payne AJ, Pfeffer WT, Stammer D, Unnikrishnan AS (2013c) Sea level change supplementary material. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, available from www.climatechange2013.org and www.ipcc.ch. Accessed 21 Sept 2017
- Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Hall JW, Harvey H (2009) Decision making under severe uncertainties for flood risk management: a case study of info-gap robustness analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Hydroinformatics 2009, Concepcion, Chili, 12–16 January 2009Google Scholar
- Helgeson C (2018) Structuring decisions under deep uncertainty. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9584-y
- Lempert R, Sriver RL, Keller K (2012) Characterizing uncertain sea level rise projections to support investment decisions. California Energy Commission, Publication Number: CEC-500-2012-056, available at http://www.energy.ca.gov/2012publications/CEC-500-2012-056/CEC-500-2012-056.pdf. Accessed 8 Sept 2017
- Lowe JA, Howard T, Pardaens A, Tinker J, Holt J, Wakelin S, Milne G, Leake J, Wolf J, Horsburgh K, Reeder T, Jenkins G, Ridley J, Dye S, Bradley S (2009) UK climate projections science report: marine and coastal projections. Met Office Hadley Centre, ExeterGoogle Scholar
- Najjar RG, Walker HA, Anderson PJ, Barron EJ, Bord RJ, Gibson JR, Kennedy VS, Knight CG, Megonigal JP, O’Connor RE, Polsky CD, Psuty NP, Richards BA, Sorenson LG, Steele EM, Swanson RS (2000) The potential impacts of climate change on the mid-Atlantic coastal region. Clim Res 14:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding - a global assessment. PLoS One 10:34Google Scholar
- Wong PP, Losada IJ, Gattuso J-P, Hinkel J, Khattabi A, McInnes KL, Saito Y, Sallenger A (2014) Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar