Abstract
Extreme precipitation events are associated with increased runoff of sediment and nutrients into surface waters, exacerbating water quality problems and creating challenges for soil and water managers. This change in the hydrologic cycle is expected to intensify under future climate change. Soil and water conservation professionals responsible for advising farmers and other land managers are on the front lines of adaptation to these climate change impacts. This study uses a survey of Soil and Water Conservation District staff (n = 260) in the United States Upper Midwest to better understand adaptation planning and implementation and the factors influencing adaptations by public organizations. In contrast to a typical planning-implementation gap finding, our respondents report a greater emphasis on some kinds of adaptation actions over planning. We find that the concerns of individual government employees about climate change have a greater association with adaptation planning strategies (e.g., planning document updates) compared to implemented adaptations on-the-ground (e.g., stream buffer installation). Also, weather projections were being used in conjunction with both adaptation planning and implementation. This study contributes to efforts to open up the black box of adaptation decision-making in the public sector, revealing the important role of individual concerns and information use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger NW, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):77–86
Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93(3):335–354
Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Boyer EW, Nolan JV, Brakebill JW (2008) Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environ Sci Technol 42(3):822–830
Angel JR, Widhalm M, Todey D, Massey R, Biehl L (2017) The U2U corn growing degree day tool: tracking corn growth across the US Corn Belt. Clim Risk Manag 15:73–81
Anhalt-Depies CM, Knoot TG, Rissman AR, Sharp AK, Martin KJ (2016) Understanding climate adaptation on public lands in the Upper Midwest: implications for monitoring and tracking progress. Environ Manag 57(5):987–997
Arbuckle JG, Morton LW, Hobbs J (2013) Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: evidence from Iowa. Clim Chang 118(3–4):551–563
Baker I, Peterson A, Brown G, McAlpine C (2012) Local government response to the impacts of climate change: an evaluation of local climate adaptation plans. Landsc Urban Plan 107(2):127–136
Barmuta LA, Linke S, Turak E (2011) Bridging the gap between ‘planning’ and ‘doing’ for biodiversity conservation in freshwaters. Freshw Biol 56(1):180–195
Berggren K, Olofsson M, Viklander M, Svensson G, Gustafsson A-M (2011) Hydraulic impacts on urban drainage systems due to changes in rainfall caused by climatic change. J Hydrol Eng 17(1):92–98
Biggs D, Abel N, Knight A, Leitch A, Langston A, Ban N (2011) The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could “mental models” help? Conserv Lett 4(3):169–183
Buizer J, Jacobs K, Cash D (2010) Making short-term climate forecasts useful: linking science and action. Proc Natl Acad Sci 200900518
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091
Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale P-J (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Chang 104(1):169–197
Dabney SM, Delgado JA, Reeves DW (2001) Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32(7–8):1221–1250
Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2010) Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. J Manag Stud 47(6):1072–1094
Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):680–689
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environ: Sci Pol Sustain Dev 50(5):26–35
Feldman DL, Ingram HM (2009) Making science useful to decision makers: climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. Weather Clim Soc 1(1):9–21
Fernandez S, Moldogaziev T (2010) Empowering public sector employees to improve performance: does it work? Am Rev Publ Admin 41(1):23–47
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2011) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis, New York
Gillon S, Booth E, Rissman A (2016) Shifting drivers and static baselines in environmental governance: challenges for proving and improving water quality outcomes. Reg Environ Chang 16(3):759–775
Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15(3):199–213
Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:622
Howden SM, Soussana J-F, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(50):19691–19696
IPCC (2014) IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC (eds) Page. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kirchhoff CJ, Carmen Lemos M, Dessai S (2013) Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38:393–414
Kling CL (2015) Can voluntary adoption of agricultural practices achieve the hypoxic zone reduction goals? Agric Policy Rev 2014(2):3
Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22(3):610–617
Krause RM (2011) Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities. J Urban Aff 33(1):45–60
Lal R, Delgado JA, Groffman PM, Millar N, Dell C, Rotz A (2011) Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 66(4):276–285
Larson WE, Lindstrom MJ, Schumacher TE (1997) The role of severe storms in soil erosion: a problem needing consideration. J Soil Water Conserv 52(2):90–95
Lemos MC, Rood RB (2010) Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1(5):670–682
Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang 2(11):789–794
Lubell M (2003) Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Polit Res Q 56(3):309–323
McCright AM (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul Environ 32(1):66–87
Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(8):889–909
Melillo JM, Richmond T, Yohe GW (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third National Climate Assessment
Michalak AM, Anderson EJ, Beletsky D, Boland S, Bosch NS, Bridgeman TB, Chaffin JD, Cho K, Confesor R, Daloğlu I (2013) Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(16):6448–6452
Minnesota Statutes §103B.801 (2015) Comprehensive Watershed Management Planning Program
Minnesota Statutes §114D.50 (2017) Clean Water Fund
Morton TA, Rabinovich A, Marshall D, Bretschneider P (2011) The future that may (or may not) come: how framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Glob Environ Chang 21(1):103–109
Moser SC (2010) Now more than ever: the need for more societally relevant research on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Appl Geogr 30(4):464–474
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(51):22026–22031
Noe RA, Wilk SL (1993) Investigation of the factors that influence employees’ participation in development activities. J Appl Psychol 78(2):291
Petersen B, Hall KR, Kahl K, Doran PJ (2013) In their own words: perceptions of climate change adaptation from the Great Lakes Region’s resource management community. Environ Pract 15(4):377–392
Porter JJ, Demeritt D, Dessai S (2015) The right stuff? Informing adaptation to climate change in British Local Government. Glob Environ Chang 35:411–422
Prokopy LS, Morton LW, Arbuckle JG Jr, Mase AS, Wilke AK (2015) Agricultural stakeholder views on climate change: implications for conducting research and outreach. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96(2):181–190
Pryor SC, Howe JA, Kunkel KE (2009) How spatially coherent and statistically robust are temporal changes in extreme precipitation in the contiguous USA? Int J Climatol 29(1):31–45
Pryor SC, Scavia D, Downer C, Gaden M, Iverson L, Nordstrom R, Patz J, Robertson GP (2014) Midwest. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) National Climate Assessment Report. US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, pp 418–440
Rissman AR, Carpenter S (2015) Progress on nonpoint pollution: barriers and opportunities. Daedalus 144(3):35–47
Rissman AR, Smail R (2014) Accounting for results: how conservation organizations report performance information. Environ Manag 55(4):916–929
Rosenberg EA, Keys PW, Booth DB, Hartley D, Burkey J, Steinemann AC, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Precipitation extremes and the impacts of climate change on stormwater infrastructure in Washington State. Clim Chang 102(1):319–349
Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA (2008) Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):479–487
Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S (2009) Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Chang 19(4):447–463
Shortle JS, Ribaudo M, Horan RD, Blandford D (2012) Reforming agricultural nonpoint pollution policy in an increasingly budget-constrained environment. Environ Sci Technol 46(3):1316–1325
Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1(1):46–49
Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972
Stein BA, Staudt A, Cross MS, Dubois NS, Enquist C, Griffis R, Hansen LJ, Hellmann JJ, Lawler JJ, Nelson EJ, Pairis A (2013) Preparing for and managing change: climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11(9):502–510
Tausanovitch C, Warshaw C (2013) Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. J Pol 75(2):330–342
USDA (2016) FY 2016 budget summary and annual performance plan
Villarini G, Smith JA, Vecchi GA (2013) Changing frequency of heavy rainfall over the Central United States. J Clim 26(1)
Wardropper CB (2018) Environmental performance information use by conservation agency staff. Environ Manag 61(4):563–576
Wisconsin Statutes § 92.10 (2005) Land and water resource management planning program
Young OR, Berkhout F, Gallopin GC, Janssen MA, van der Leeuw S (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):304–316
Zhang X, Liu X, Zhang M, Dahlgren RA, Eitzel M (2010) A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J Environ Qual 39:76–84
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Water Sustainability and Climate grant DEB 1038759 and Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) DGE 1144752. We appreciate insightful comments on the manuscript from two anonymous reviewers. Thanks to all the Conservation District and state Agriculture Department staff who participated in this study, and for their ongoing work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wardropper, C.B., Rissman, A.R. Adaptations to extreme storm events by conservation organizations. Climatic Change 152, 85–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2342-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2342-8