There is increasing concern that avoiding climate change impacts will require proactive adaptation, particularly for infrastructure systems with long lifespans. However, one challenge in adaptation is the uncertainty surrounding climate change projections generated by general circulation models (GCMs). This uncertainty has been addressed in different ways. For example, some researchers use ensembles of GCMs to generate probabilistic climate change projections, but these projections can be highly sensitive to assumptions about model independence and weighting schemes. Because of these issues, others argue that robustness-based approaches to climate adaptation are more appropriate, since they do not rely on a precise probabilistic representation of uncertainty. In this research, we present a new approach for characterizing climate change risks that leverages robust decision frameworks and probabilistic GCM ensembles. The scenario discovery process is used to search across a multi-dimensional space and identify climate scenarios most associated with system failure, and a Bayesian statistical model informed by GCM projections is then developed to estimate the probability of those scenarios. This provides an important advancement in that it can incorporate decision-relevant climate variables beyond mean temperature and precipitation and account for uncertainty in probabilistic estimates in a straightforward way. We also suggest several advancements building on prior approaches to Bayesian modeling of climate change projections to make them more broadly applicable. We demonstrate the methodology using proposed water resources infrastructure in Lake Tana, Ethiopia, where GCM disagreement on changes in future rainfall presents a major challenge for infrastructure planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alemayehu T, McCartney M, Kebede S (2010) The water resource implications of planned development in the Lake Tana catchment, Ethiopia. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 10:211–221. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-011-0023-6
Arnell NW, Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2005) Eliciting information from experts on the likelihood of rapid climate change: eliciting information on rapid climate change. Risk Anal 25:1419–1431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00689.x
Ben-Haim Y (2000) Robust rationality and decisions under severe uncertainty. J Frankl Inst 337:171–199
Ben-Haim Y, Smithson M (2018) Data-based prediction under uncertainty: CDF-quantile distributions and info-gap robustness. J Math Psych 87:11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.08.006
Borgomeo E, Mortazavi-Naeini M, Hall JW, Guillod BP (2018) Risk, robustness and water resources planning under uncertainty. Earths Future 6:468–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000730
Brown C, Ghile Y, Laverty M, Li K (2012) Decision scaling: linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. Water Resour Res 48:W09537. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011212
Bryant BJ (2014) Sdtoolkit: scenario discovery tools to support robust decision making. R package version 2:33–31
Bryant BP, Lempert RJ (2010) Thinking inside the box: a participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77:34–49
Celio E, Koellner T, Grêt-Regamey A (2014) Modeling land use decisions with Bayesian networks: spatially explicit analysis of driving forces on land use change. Environ Model Softw 52:222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.014
Clark MP, Wilby RL, Gutmann ED et al (2016) Characterizing uncertainty of the hydrologic impacts of climate change. Curr Clim Change Rep 2:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0034-x
Frigg R, Smith LA, Stainforth DA (2013) The myopia of imperfect climate models: the case of UKCP09. Philos Sci 80:886–897. https://doi.org/10.1086/673892
Garner G, Reed P, Keller K (2016) Climate risk management requires explicit representation of societal trade-offs. Clim Chang 134:713–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1607-3
Haasnoot M, Middelkoop H, Offermans A et al (2012) Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. Clim Chang 115:795–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0444-2
Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, ter Maat J (2013) Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Glob Environ Chang 23:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
Hagemann S, Chen C, Haerter JO et al (2011) Impact of a statistical bias correction on the projected hydrological changes obtained from three GCMs and two hydrology models. J Hydrometeorol 12:556–578. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1336.1
Hallegatte S (2011) Uncertainties in the cost-benefit analysis of adaptation measures, and consequences for decision making. In: Climate. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 169–192
Herman JD, Zeff HB, Reed PM, Characklis GW (2014) Beyond optimality: multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty. Water Resour Res 50:7692–7713. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015338
Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27
Kasprzyk JR, Nataraj S, Reed PM, Lempert RJ (2013) Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environ Model Softw 42:55–71
Kasprzyk JR, Reed PM, Hadka DM (2016) Battling arrow’s paradox to discover robust water management alternatives. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142:04015053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000572
Knutti R, Furrer R, Tebaldi C et al (2010) Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J Clim 23:2739–2758
Kunreuther H, Heal G, Allen M et al (2013) Risk management and climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1740
Kwadijk JCJ, Haasnoot M, Mulder JPM et al (2010) Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: a case study in the Netherlands. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:729–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.64
Kwakkel JH, Haasnoot M, Walker WE (2016a) Comparing robust decision-making and dynamic adaptive policy pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 86:168–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017
Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, Haasnoot M (2016b) Coping with the wickedness of public policy problems: approaches for decision making under deep uncertainty. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142:01816001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000626
Lempert R, Kalra N, Peyraud S, et al (2013) Ensuring robust flood risk management in Ho Chi Minh City. World Bank Policy Res Work Pap
Lempert RJ, Groves DG, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52:514–528
Lempert RJ, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2003) Shaping the next one hundred years: new methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. RAND, Santa Monica, CA
Masson D, Knutti R (2011) Climate model genealogy. Geophys Res Lett 38:L08703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046864
Morgan MG (2014) Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:7176–7184. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319946111
Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Jenkins GJ, et al (2009) UK climate projections science report: climate change projections. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom
Nassopoulos H, Dumas P, Hallegatte S (2012) Adaptation to an uncertain climate change: cost benefit analysis and robust decision making for dam dimensioning. Clim Chang 114:497–508
Oppenheimer M, Little CM, Cooke RM (2016) Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:445–451. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2959
Seleshi Y, Camberlin P (2006) Recent changes in dry spell and extreme rainfall events in Ethiopia. Theor Appl Climatol 83:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-005-0134-3
Shortridge J, Guikema S, Zaitchik B (2017) Robust decision making in data scarce contexts: addressing data and model limitations for infrastructure planning under transient climate change. Clim Chang 140:323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1845-4
Shortridge JE, Guikema SD (2016) Scenario discovery with multiple criteria: an evaluation of the robust decision making framework for climate adaptation. Risk Anal 36:2298–2312. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12582
Siam MS, Eltahir EAB (2017) Climate change enhances interannual variability of the Nile river flow. Nat Clim Chang 7(5):350
Stainforth D, Allen M, Tredger E, Smith L (2007) Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2145–2161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2074
Steinschneider S, McCrary R, Mearns LO, Brown C (2015a) The effects of climate model similarity on probabilistic climate projections and the implications for local, risk-based adaptation planning: intermodel correlation and risk. Geophys Res Lett 42:5014–5044. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064529
Steinschneider S, McCrary R, Wi S et al (2015b) Expanded decision-scaling framework to select robust long-term water-system plans under hydroclimatic uncertainties. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141:04015023
Stephenson DB, Collins M, Rougier JC, Chandler RE (2012) Statistical problems in the probabilistic prediction of climate change. Environmetrics 23:364–372
Tang S, Dessai S (2012) Usable science? The U.K. climate projections 2009 and decision support for adaptation planning. Weather Clim Soc 4:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00028.1
Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2053–2075
Tebaldi C, Sansó B (2009) Joint projections of temperature and precipitation change from multiple climate models: a hierarchical Bayesian approach. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 172:83–106
Tebaldi C, Smith RL, Nychka D, Mearns LO (2005) Quantifying uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: a Bayesian approach to the analysis of multimodel ensembles. J Clim 18:1524–1540
Thrasher B, Maurer EP, McKellar C, Duffy PB (2012) Technical note: bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3309–3314. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3309-2012
Thrasher B, Xiong J, Wang W et al (2013) Downscaled climate projections suitable for resource management. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 94:321–323
Vaughan DG, Spouge JR (2002) Risk estimation of collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet. Clim Chang 52:65–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013038920600
Weaver CP, Lempert RJ, Brown C et al (2013) Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 4:39–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.202
Wilby RL, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.543
The authors would like to acknowledge the Ethiopian Ministry of Water and Energy, the Tana Sub Basin Organization, and the International Water Management Institute for providing the data and models on which this analysis was based. Dr. Zaitchik’s contribution to this research was supported through NSF-ICER Grant 1624335. The source code and simulation model for the analyses described in this manuscript can be obtained from the corresponding author. We would also like to acknowledge two anonymous reviewers whose thorough review greatly enhanced the manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Shortridge, J.E., Zaitchik, B.F. Characterizing climate change risks by linking robust decision frameworks and uncertain probabilistic projections. Climatic Change 151, 525–539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2324-x
- Probabilistic projections
- Robust decision-making