Perceptions of seasonal weather are linked to beliefs about global climate change: evidence from Norway

Article

Abstract

As climate change continues to alter local weather patterns, it is important to understand how people are experiencing such changes because personal experience may affect mitigation and adaptation policy preferences and behaviors. Local weather conditions are also an easily accessible source of information that, aggregated over time, may enable people to detect long-term climate trends and update their beliefs about global warming. However, motivated reasoning—the tendency to fit information to conclusions that correspond with a preexisting belief—may limit the accuracy of local weather perceptions. This paper focuses on perceptions of seasonal weather in Norway and examines evidence for motivated reasoning consistent with pre-existing beliefs about climate change, using a national panel survey combined with high-resolution seasonal climate observations. Respondents’ perceptions are sensitive to observed differences in both temperature and precipitation, but respondents are more likely to accurately perceive local precipitation than local temperature. Controlling for observed conditions, beliefs about global climate change had a large effect on perceptions of seasonal temperature, and smaller effects on perceptions of seasonal precipitation. These findings provide evidence that individual perceptions of seasonal weather are related to local conditions, but they are also likely to be motivated by beliefs about global climate change.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Data collection was conducted by the Norwegian Citizen Panel, a collaboration of the University of Bergen and Uni Research Rokkan Centre. The author wishes to thank Matto Mildenberger, Endre Tvinnereim, and participants of the Norwegian Citizen Panel conference for comments on previous drafts.

Supplementary material

10584_2018_2210_MOESM1_ESM.docx (911 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 911 kb)

References

  1. Aasen M (2017) The polarization of public concern about climate change in Norway. Clim Pol 17:213–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1094727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang Part A 15:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D et al (2013) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Chang 21:81–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austgulen MH, Stø E (2013) Norsk skepsis og usikkerhet om klimaendringer. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 54:124–150Google Scholar
  5. Bohr J (2017) Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public. Climatic Change:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1934-z
  6. Borick CP, Rabe BG (2017) Personal experience, extreme weather events, and perceptions of climate change. Oxf Res Encyclopedia Climate Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.311
  7. Botzen WJW, Michel-Kerjan E, Kunreuther H et al (2016) Political affiliation affects adaptation to climate risks: evidence from New York City. Clim Chang 138:353–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1735-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broomell SB, Budescu DV, Por H-H (2015) Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act. Glob Environ Chang 32:67–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broomell SB, Winkles J-F, Kane PB (2017) The perception of daily temperatures as evidence of global warming. Wea Climate Soc 9:563–574.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0003.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutler MJ (2015) Seeing and believing: the emergent nature of extreme weather perceptions. Environ Sociol 1:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demski C, Capstick S, Pidgeon N et al (2016) Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Clim Chang:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4
  12. Deryugina T (2013) How do people update? The effects of local weather fluctuations on beliefs about global warming. Clim Chang 118:397–416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0615-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson JE, Bright EA, Coleman PR et al (2000) LandScan: a global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66:849–857Google Scholar
  14. Eckersley R (2013) Poles apart?: the social construction of responsibility for climate change in Australia and Norway. Aust J Politics History 59:382–396.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J Polit 74:796–809.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goebbert K, Jenkins-Smith HC, Klockow K et al (2012) Weather, climate and worldviews: the sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns. Weather Climate Soc 4:132–144.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang Part A 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton L, Lemcke-Stampone M (2016) Was December warm? Family, politics, and recollections of weather. The Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars’ RepositoryGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Keim BD et al (2016a) Wildfire, climate, and perceptions in Northeast Oregon. Reg Environ Chang 16:1819–1832.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0914-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton LC, Stampone MD (2013) Blowin’ in the wind: short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather Clim Soc 5:112–119.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton LC, Wake CP, Hartter J et al (2016b) Flood realities, perceptions and the depth of divisions on climate. Sociology 50:913–933.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516648547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Tank AMG., et al (2008) A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J Geophys Res 113:84.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD10201
  23. Helliesen MS (2015) In science we trust, through ideology we look: explaining climate change attitudes in Norway. University of BergenGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofstra N, Haylock M, New M, Jones PD (2009) Testing E-OBS European high-resolution gridded data set of daily precipitation and surface temperature. J Geophys Res 114:16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe PD, Leiserowitz A (2013) Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U.S. Glob Environ Chang 23:1488–1500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howe PD, Markowitz EM, Lee TM et al (2013) Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nat Clim Chang 3:352–356.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hulme M, Dessai S, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR (2009) Unstable climates: exploring the statistical and social constructions of “normal” climate. Geoforum 40:197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IEA (2017) Key world energy statistics. International Energy AgencyGoogle Scholar
  29. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  30. Joireman J, Barnes Truelove H, Duell B (2010) Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. J Environ Psychol 30:358–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufmann RK, Mann ML, Gopal S et al (2017) Spatial heterogeneity of climate change as an experiential basis for skepticism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:67–71.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607032113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 108:480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, et al (2015) Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change acceptedGoogle Scholar
  34. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, et al (2013) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in April, 2013. Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  35. Marx SM, Weber EU, Orlove BS et al (2007) Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob Environ Chang 17:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52:155–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2014) The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming. Nat Clim Chang 4:1077–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNeeley SM, Lazrus H (2014) The cultural theory of risk for climate change adaptation. Wea Climat Soc 6:506–519.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00027.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C et al (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:343–347.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schuldt JP, Roh S (2014) Of accessibility and applicability: how heat-related cues affect belief in “global warming” versus “climate change”. Soc Cogn 32:217–238.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shao W (2016) Are actual weather and perceived weather the same? Understanding perceptions of local weather and their effects on risk perceptions of global warming. Journal of Risk Research 19:722–742.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.1003956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Switzer D, Vedlitz A (2016) Green colored lenses: worldviews and motivated reasoning in the case of local water scarcity Environ Behav 0013916516669391.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516669391
  44. Taylor A, Dessai S, de Bruin WB (2017) Public priorities and expectations of climate change impacts in the United Kingdom. J Risk Res 0:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tranter B, Booth K (2015) Scepticism in a changing climate: a cross-national study. Glob Environ Chang 33:154–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tvinnereim E, Fløttum K (2015) Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change. Nat Clim Chang Adv Online Publ.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2663
  47. Weber EU (1997) Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In: Bazerman M, Messick D, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 314–341Google Scholar
  48. Weber EU (2006) Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim Chang 77:103–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2014) How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat Clim Chang 4:143–147.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environment & SocietyQuinney College of Natural Resources, Utah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations