Climatic Change

, Volume 146, Issue 1–2, pp 133–144 | Cite as

Translating national level forest service goals to local level land management: carbon sequestration

  • Steven McNulty
  • Emrys Treasure
  • Lisa Jennings
  • David Meriwether
  • David Harris
  • Paul Arndt


The USDA Forest Service has many national level policies related to multiple use management. However, translating national policy to stand level forest management can be difficult. As an example of how a national policy can be put into action, we examined three case studies in which a desired future condition is evaluated at the national, region, and local scale. We chose to use carbon sequestration as the desired future condition because climate change has become a major area of concern during the last decade. Several studies have determined that the 193 million acres of US national forest land currently sequester 11 to 15% of the total carbon emitted as a nation. This paper provides a framework by which national scale strategies for maintaining or enhancing forest carbon sequestration is translated through regional considerations and local constraints in adaptive management practices. Although this framework used the carbon sequestration as a case study, this framework could be used with other national level priorities such as the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) or the Endangered Species Act (ESA).



This work was supported by the USDA Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center cooperative agreement 11-CR-11330147-016.


  1. Achtemeier GL, Goodrick SA, Liu Y, Garcia-Menendez F, Hu Y, Odman MT (2011) Modeling smoke plume rise and dispersion from southern United States prescribed burns with daysmoke. Atmosphere 2(3):358–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birdsey R, Pregitzer K, Lucier A (2006) Forest carbon management in the United States: 1600–2100. J Environ Qual 35(4):1461–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer WD (1990) Longleaf pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH. (Tech. Coords.) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture handbook 654, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. vol. 2, 877 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter MC, Foster CD (2004) Prescribed burning and productivity in southern pine forests: a review. For Ecol Manag 191(1):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costanza JK, Terando AJ, McKerrow AJ, Collazo JA (2015) Modeling climate change, urbanization, and fire effects on Pinus palustris ecosystems of the southeastern US. J Environ Manag 151:186–199Google Scholar
  7. Croker TC, Boyer WD (1975) Regenerating longleaf pine naturally. Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, p 26Google Scholar
  8. Davis SC, Hessl AE, Scott CJ, Adams MB, Thomas RB (2009) Forest carbon sequestration changes in response to timber harvest. Forest Ecol Manag 258:2101–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dilustro JJ, Collins BS, Duncan LK, Sharitz RR (2002) Soil texture, land-use intensity, and vegetation of Fort Benning upland forest sites. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 289–297Google Scholar
  10. Di Tomaso JM, Brooks ML, Allen EB, Minnich R, Rice PM, Kyser GB (2006) Control of invasive weeds with prescribed burning 1. Weed Technol 20:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J For 105:337–347Google Scholar
  12. Frost CC (1993) Four centuries of changing landscape patterns in the longleaf pine ecosystem. In Proceedings of the Tall Timbers fire ecology conference 18:17–43Google Scholar
  13. Gilliam FS, Platt WJ (1999) Effects of long-term fire exclusion on tree species composition and stand structure in an old-growth Pinus palustris (longleaf pine) forest. Plant Ecol 140:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glitzenstein JS, Platt WJ, Streng DR (1995) Effects of fire regime and habitat on tree dynamics in north Florida longleaf pine savannas. Ecol Monogr 65:441–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyvonen R, Agren GI, Linder S, Persson T, Cotrufo MF, Ekblad A, Freeman M, Freeman M, Grelle A, Janssens IA, Jarvis PG, Kellomäki S, Lindroth A, Loustau D, Lundmark T, Norby RJ, Oren R, Pilegaard K, Ryan MG, Sigurdsson BD, Strömgren M, van Oijen M, Wallin G (2007) The likely impact of elevated CO2, nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol 173:462–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnsen KH, Butnor JR, Kush JS, Schmidtling RC, Nelson CD (2009) Hurricane Katrina winds damaged longleaf pine less than loblolly pine. South J Appl For 33:178–181Google Scholar
  17. Johnsen KH, Keyser TL, Butnor JR, Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Kaczmarek DJ, Maier CA, Sun G (2013) Productivity and carbon sequestration of forest in the Southern United States. In: Productivity and carbon sequestration of forests in the Southern United States. Climate change adaptation and mitigation management options: a guide for natural resource managers in southern forest ecosystems. p 492Google Scholar
  18. Kartesz JT, Meacham CA (1999) Synthesis of the North American flora. North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  19. Keyser TL, Zarnoch SJ (2012) Thinning, age, and site quality influence live tree carbon stocks in upland hardwood forests of the southern Appalachians. For Sci 58:407–418Google Scholar
  20. Kush JS, Meldahl RS, McMahon CK, Boyer WD (2004) Longleaf pine: a sustainable approach for increasing terrestrial carbon in the southern United States. Environ Manag 33:S139–S147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Landers JL, Van Lear DH, Boyer WD (1995) The longleaf pine forests of the southeast: requiem or renaissance? J Forestry 93:39–44Google Scholar
  22. Martin KL, Hurteau MD, Hungate BA, Koch GW, North MP (2015) Carbon tradeoffs of restoration and provision of endangered species habitat in a fire-maintained forest. Ecosystems 18:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKinley DC, Ryan MG, Birdsey RA, Giardina CP, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jackson RB, Morrison JF, Murray BC, Pataki DE, Skog KE (2011) A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecol Appl 21(6):1902–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McNulty SG, Boggs JL, Sun G (2014) The rise of the mediocre forest: why chronically stressed trees may better survive extreme episodic climate variability. New For 45:403–415Google Scholar
  25. Melvin MA (2015). 2015 national PB use survey report. Coalition of PB Councils Inc. Tech. Rep. 02–15, 22 pp. [Available online at PB Use Survey Report.pdf]
  26. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore PT, DeRose RJ, Long JN, van Miegroet H (2012) Using silviculture to influence carbon sequestration in southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests. Forests 3:300–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC) (2014) National Climate Assessment report. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC. Available online at; last accessed Jan. 16, 2017
  29. Outcalt KW, Sheffield RM (1996). The longleaf pine forest: trends and current c conditions. Resour. Bull. SRS. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 28Google Scholar
  30. Pickering J, Kays R, Meier A, Andrew S, Yatskievych R (2003) The Appalachians. Wilderness Earth’s last wild places. Conservation International, Washington, DC, p 576Google Scholar
  31. Rankin WT, Herbert N (2014) Restoration in the southern Appalachians: a dialogue among scientists, planners, and land managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-189. USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 48Google Scholar
  32. Reinhardt ED, Holsinger L, Keane R (2010) Effects of biomass removal treatments on stand-level fire characteristics in major forest types of the northern Rocky Mountains. West J Appl For 25:34–41Google Scholar
  33. Renninger HJ, Clark KL, Skowronski N, Schäfer KV (2013) Effects of a prescribed fire on water use and photosynthetic capacity of pitch pines. Trees 27:1115–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwenk WS, Donovan TM, Keeton WS, Nunery JS (2012) Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Appl 22:1612–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanturf JA, Wade DD, Waldrop TA, Kennard DK, Achtemeier GL (2002) Background paper: fire in southern forest landscapes. P 607–630 in Southern Forest Resource Assessment, Wear, D. N. and J. G. Greis (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-53. 635 pGoogle Scholar
  36. USDA (2014) Strategic Plan FY 2014–2018. Available online at; last accessed 7 July 2017
  37. USDA (2016) USDA Building Blocks for Climate Smart Agriculture and Forestry. Available online at; last accessed 7 July 2017
  38. USDA Forest Service (1960) Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act. Available online at; last accessed 15 Jan 2017
  39. USDA Forest Service (2001) U.S. forest facts and historical trends. Available online at; last accessed 27 Jan 2017
  40. USDA Forest Service (2007) The U.S. Forest Service—an overview. Available online at; last accessed 24 Jan 2017
  41. USDA Forest Service (2010) Climate Change Considerations in Land Management Plan Revisions. Available online at; last accessed 15 Jan 2017
  42. USDA Forest Service (2012) National Forest System land management planning. Available online at; last accessed 17 Jan 2017
  43. US EPA (2017) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2015. EPA 430-P-17-001. 633 pGoogle Scholar
  44. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2003) Recovery plan for the Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) second revision. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  45. Vose JM, Peterson DL, Patel-Weynand T (2012) Effects of climatic variability and change on forest ecosystems: a comprehensive science synthesis for the U.S. forest sector. USDA for. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-870. 265 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Wade DD, Lundsford J (1990) Fire as a forest management tool: prescribed burning in the southern United States. Unasylva 41:28–38Google Scholar
  47. Wade DD, Brock BL, Brose PH, Grace JB, Hoch GA, Patterson III WA (2000). Fire in eastern ecosystems. P 53–96 in Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora, Brown JK, Smith JK (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-42. 256 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Wear DN, Greis JG (2012). The southern forest futures project: summary report. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-168. 54 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Research StationU.S.D.A. Forest ServiceRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National ForestU.S.D.A. Forest ServiceNeboUSA
  3. 3.Region 8 – Southern Regional OfficeU.S.D.A Forest ServiceAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations