Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vulnerability of crops and croplands in the US Northern Plains to predicted climate change

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The states of Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming comprise the Northern Great Plains region of the USA. The soil and water resources contained in this region have historically supported highly diverse and productive agriculture enterprises that provide a significant proportion of the food, feed, and oilseed for the nation. The region also provides ecological services that influence air, water, and soil quality along with biological diversity. Combined with livestock production and a biofuel industry, crop production forms an integrated system that can offer producers flexibility in management decisions. Projected climatic changes for this region include increasing atmospheric CO2, a longer, warmer growing season, and increased precipitation, likely received in more frequent extreme events. These changes will impact soil and water resources in the region and create opportunities and challenges for land managers. The objectives of this paper are to describe anticipated impacts of projected mid-(2050) and late-(2085) climatic changes on crop production systems in the Northern Great Plains and provide adaptation strategies that should be developed to take advantage of positive and mitigate negative changes. Projected climatic changes will influence agricultural productivity directly as well as indirectly due to changes in weed pressure, insect populations, and diseases. A warmer, longer growing season will change the crops and distribution of those crops grown within the region. An increase in the number of extreme temperature events (high daytime highs or nighttime lows) will decrease crop yields due to increased plant stress during critical pollination and grain fill periods. Adaptation strategies to reduce vulnerability of soil and water resources to projected climatic changes include increasing cropping intensity, reducing tillage intensity, and use of cover crops to provide surface cover to reduce erosion potential and improve nutrient and water use efficiency. Increased use of perennial forages, crop residue, and failed crops in integrated crop-livestock systems will add biological diversity and provide options for converting vegetation biomass into animal protein. Socio-economic changes will need to be incorporated into adaptation strategies planning to insure that sustaining ecosystem services and meeting desired production and conservation goals is accomplished. Education and extension services will be needed to transfer adaptive knowledge in a timely manner to producers in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar J, Gramig GG, Hendrickson JR, Archer DW, Forcella F, Liebig MA (2015) Crop species diversity changes in the United States: 1978–2012. PLoS One 10(8):0136580

    Google Scholar 

  • Asif J, Yilmaz O, Ozturk O (2016) Elevated carbon dioxide ameliorates the effect of Zn deficiency and terminal drought on wheat grain yield by nutritional quality. Plant Soil. doi:10.1007/s11104-016-2996-9

  • Bakker MG, Moorman TB, Kaspar TC, Manter DK (2016) Winter rye cover crops as a host for corn seedling pathogens. Am Phytopatho Soc 106:S1.2. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-106-1-s1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basche AD, Archontoulis S, Kaspar TC, Jaynes DB, Parkin TB, Miguez F (2016) Simulating long-term impacts of cover crops and climate change on crop production and environmental outcomes in the midwestern United States. Agric Ecosystems Environ 218:95–106. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.011

  • Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM, Whilhite DA (2014) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchi CJ, ADB L, Heady LE, Morgan PB, Dohleman FG, JM MG, Gillespie KM, Wittig VE, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR (2006) Hourly and seasonal variation in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of soybean grown at future CO2 and ozone concentrations for 3 years under fully open-air field conditions. Plant Cell Environ 29(11):2077–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbach ME, Young AR, Korus JT (2014) The potential impacts of projected changes in climate on groundwater resources in Nebraska. In: Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM, Wilhite DA (eds) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems. Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Booker FL, Burkey KO, Tu C, Shew HD, Rufty TW, Fiscus EL, Deforest JL, Hu S (2011) Soil microbial responses to elevated CO2 and O3 in a nitrogen-aggrading agroecosystem. PLoS One 6(6):e21377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley SM, Sherm H, Chakraborty S (1999) Climate change and plant disease management. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:399–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) (2017) Crop production contributions toward agricultural productivity: the need for agricultural innovation to sustainably feed the world by 2050. Issue Paper 58. CAST, Ames

  • Culman SW, Snapp SS, Ollenburger M, Basso B, LR DH (2013) Soil and water quality rapidly responds to perennial grain Kernza wheatgrass. Agron J 105:735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffenbaugh NS, Krupke CH, White MA, Alexander CE (2008) Global warming presents new challenges for maize pest management. Environ Res Letters 4:044007

  • Doran JW, Mielke LN, Power JF (1990) Microbial activity as regulated by soil water-filled pore space. In: Transactions of the 14th International Congress of Soil Science, Kyoto, Japan. International Soil Science Society, Wageningen, pp 94–100

  • Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbs M, Manderscheid R, Jansen G, Seddig S, Pacholski A, Weigel H-J (2010) Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on grain quality parameters and elemental composition of wheat and barley grown in crop rotation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris R, Ellis RH, Wheeler TR, Hadley P (1998) Effect of high temperature stress at anthesis on grain yield and biomass of field-grown crops of wheat. Ann Bot 82(5):631–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorson AD, Black AL (1974) Saline seep development in dryland soils of north-eastern Montana. J Soil Water Conserv 29:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL (2006) Multifunctionality of agriculture and farming system design: perspectives from the United States. Bibliotecha Fragmenta Agronomica 11:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes BJ, Lewin HA, Goddard ME (2013) The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Trends Genet 29:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson JR, Hanson JD, Tanaka DL, Sassenrath G (2008a) Principles of integrated agricultural systems: introduction to processes and definition. Renew Agric Food Syst 23(04):265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson JR, Liebig MA, Sassenrath GF (2008b) Environment and integrated agricultural systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 23:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar TC, Singer JW (2011) The use of cover crops to manage soil. In: Hatfield JL, Sauer TJ (eds) Soil management: building a Stable Base for agriculture. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 321–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper TC, Colvin TS, Jaynes B, Karlen DL, James DE, Meek DW (2003) Relationship between six years of corn yields and terrain attributes. Precis Agric 4:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen NR, Sudduth KA, Drummond ST, Scharf PC, Palm HL, Robert DF, Vories ED (2010) Ground-based canopy reflectance sensing for variable-rate nitrogen corn fertilization. Agron J 102:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Gutmann MP (1999) The structure and function of ecosystems in the central north American grassland region. Great Plains Res 9:223–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire G, Franzluebbers A, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Dedieu B (2014) Integrated crop–livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liska A, Holley E (2014) Climate change and its implications for the insurance industry. In: Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM et al (eds) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, pp 59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Xie X, Du J, Sun J, Bai X (2008) Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky bluegrass. Sci Hortic 115(2):190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2(1):014002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Lesch SM, Corwin DL, Ulmer MG, Anderson KA, Potts DJ, Doolittle JA, Baltes MJ (2009) Regional-scale assessment of soil salinity in the Red River Valley using multi-year MODIS EVI and NDVI. J Environ Qual 39:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubofsky E (2016) The promise of perennials. CSA News, November 2016 pp 4–7

  • May RM, Dobson AP (1986) Population dynamics and the rate of evolution of pesticide resistance, in pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for management. National Research Council Committee on Strategies for the Management of Pesticide Resistant Pest Populations, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney A, Whelan B, Ancev T (2005) Future directions of precision agriculture. Precis Agric 6:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore EB, Kaspar TC, Wiedenhoeft MH, Cambardella CA (2014) Rye cover crop effects on soil quality in no-till silage-soybean cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:968–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DC, Lyon DJ, Higgens RK, Hergert GW, Holman JD, Vigil MF (2015) Cover crop effect on subsequent wheat yield in the central Great Plains. Agron J 108:243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DC, Vigil MF, Hansen NC (2016) Evaluating potential dryland cropping systems adapted to climate change in the central Great Plains. Agron J 108:2391–2405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North Dakota State Water Commission (2015) Trends in North Dakota field water management. The Oxbow, April 2015, pp 16–18

  • Patterson DT, Westbrook JK, Joyce RJV, Lingren PD, Rogasik J (1999) Weeds, insects, and diseases. Clim Chang 43(4):711–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Thrasher BL (2014) Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). J Hydrometeorol 15:2558–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC (2015) Improved bias correction techniques for hydrological simulations of climate change. J Hydrometeorol 16:2421–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans the R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1554):2959–2971

  • Rahman A, Wardle D (1990) Effects of climate change on cropping weeds in New Zealand. In: Prestidge RA, Pottinger RP (eds) The impact of climate change on pests, diseases, weeds and beneficial organisms present in New Zealand agricultural and horticultural systems. Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, pp 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathje G-W, Wienhold BJ, Wilhelm WW, Diepenbrock W (2007) Tillage and rotation effect on corn-soybean energy balances in eastern Nebraska. Soil Tillage Res 97:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiere JB, Ibrahim MNM, Van Keulen H (2002) The role of livestock for sustainability in mixed farming: criteria and scenario studies under varying resource allocation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90(2):139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelpfennig D (2016) Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture. ERR-217, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, October 2016

  • Schneider JC (2014) Implications of a changing climate for Nebraska’s water resources and its management. In: Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Wilhite DA (eds) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer M, Ojima D, Antle JM, Kluck D, McPherson RA, Petersen S, Scanlon B, Sherman K (2014) Ch. 19: Great Plains. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TTC, Yohe GW (eds) U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 441–461, Doi:10.7930/JOD798BC

  • Soil and Water Conservation Society (2003) Soil erosion and runoff from cropland report from the USA. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer G, Wienhold BJ, Richardson JL, Disrud LA (1999) Salinity and sodicity induced changes in dispersible clay and saturated hydraulic conductivity is sulfatic soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:2211–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulc RM, Franzluebbers AJ (2014) Exploring integrated crop–livestock systems in different ecoregions of the United States. Eur J Agron 57:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulc RM, Tracy BF (2007) Integrated crop–livestock systems in the US Corn Belt. Agron J 99(2):335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger PW, Baumhardt RL (1999) Factors related to dryland grain sorghum yield increases: 1939 through 1997. Agron J 91:870–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NASS (2013) Farm and ranch irrigation survey. 2012 Census of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. US Department of Agriculture

  • USDA-NASS (2016a) Crop Production 2015 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistic Service, Washington, DC

  • USDA-NASS (2016b) Crop Values 2015 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistic Service, Washington, DC

  • Vigil MF, Nielsen DC (1997) Winter wheat yield depression from legume green fallow. Agron J 90:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh J, Wuebbles K, Hayhoe K, Kossin J, Kunkel K, Stephens G, Thorne P, et al., (2014) Ch. 2: our changing climate. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TTC, Yohe GW (eds) U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 19–67. doi:10.7930/J0KW5CXT

  • Walther G-R (2010) Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1549):2019–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wienhold BJ, Schmer MR, Jin VL, Varvel GE, Gollany H (2015) CQESTR simulated changes in soil organic carbon under residue removal practices in continuous corn systems. Bioenergy Res 9:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grassland and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:4134–4139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-G, Hernandez M, Anson E, Nearing MA, Wei H, Stone JJ, Heilman P (2012) Modeling climate change effects on runoff and soil erosion in southeastern Arizona rangelands and implications for mitigation with rangeland conservation practices. J Soil Water Conserv 67(5):390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipper SC, Qiu J, Kucharik CJ (2016) Drought effects on US maize and soybean production: spatiotemporal patterns and historical changes. Environ Res Lett 11(9):094021

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Wienhold.

Additional information

This article is part of a Special Issue on ‘Vulnerability Assessment of US Agriculture and Forests developed by the USDA Climate Hubs’ edited by Jerry L. Hatfield, Rachel Steele, Beatrice van Horne, and William Gould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wienhold, B.J., Vigil, M.F., Hendrickson, J.R. et al. Vulnerability of crops and croplands in the US Northern Plains to predicted climate change. Climatic Change 146, 219–230 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1989-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1989-x

Navigation