Groundwater depletion and climate change: future prospects of crop production in the Central High Plains Aquifer
Crop production in the Central High Plains is at an all-time high due to increased demand for biofuels, food, and animal products. Despite the need to produce more food by mid-century to meet expected population growth, under current management and genetics, crop production is likely to plateau or decline in the Central High Plains due to groundwater withdrawal at rates that greatly exceed recharge to the aquifer. The Central High Plains has experienced a consistent decline in groundwater storage due to groundwater withdrawal for irrigation greatly exceeding natural recharge. In this heavily irrigated region, water is essential to maintain yields and economic stability. Here, we evaluate how current trends in irrigation demand may impact groundwater depletion and quantify the impacts of these changes on crop yield and production through to 2099 using the well-established System Approach to Land Use Sustainability (SALUS) crop model. The results show that status quo groundwater management will likely reduce irrigated corn acreage by ~60% and wheat acreage by ~50%. This widespread forced shift to dryland farming, coupled with the likely effects of climate change, will contribute to overall changes in crop production. Taking into account both changes in yield and available irrigated acreage, corn production would decrease by approximately 60%, while production of wheat would remain fairly steady with a slight increase of about 2%.
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant WSC 1039180 and United States Department of Agriculture NIFA Water Cap Award 2015-68007-23133.
KAC executed the experiments. KAC, ADK, BB, and DWH wrote and made significant contributions to the structure of the paper. KAC, ADK, BB, and DWH analyzed the data and interpreted results.
- Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision.Google Scholar
- Bagley J, Whitesell A (2017) Water information management and analysis system (WIMAS) for the web. http://hercules.kgs.ku.edu/geohydro/wimas/query_setup/cfm.
- Basso B, Ritchie JT (2012) Assessing the impact of management strategies on water use efficiency using soil–plant–atmosphere models. Vadose Zone J 11(3). doi: 10.2136/vzj2011.0173
- Basso B, Ritchie JT (2015) Simulating crop growth and biogeochemical fluxes in response to land management using the SALUS model. In: Hamilton SK, Doll JE, Robertson GP (eds) The ecology of agricultural landscapes: long-term research on the path to sustainability. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 252–274Google Scholar
- Boryan CG, Yang Z, Willis P (2014) US geospatial crop frequency data layers. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics 2014).Google Scholar
- Clarke LE, Edmonds JA, Jacoby HD, et al (2007) Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric. Sub-report 2.1A of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1 by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research.Google Scholar
- Ek M, Xia Y, Wood E et al (2011) North American Land Data Assimilation System Phase 2 (NLDAS-2): development and applications. GEWEX News 2:6–8Google Scholar
- FAO (2015) Crop water information: wheat. In: FAO Water Dev. Manag. Unit.Google Scholar
- Fujino J, Nair R, Kainuma M et al (2006) Multi-gas mitigation analysis on stabilization scenarios using aim global model. Energy J 27:343–353Google Scholar
- Gutentag ED, Heimes FJ, Krothe NC, et al (1984) Geohydrology of the High Plains Aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming.Google Scholar
- Hecox GR, Macfarlane PA, Wilson BB (2002a) Calculation of yield for High Plains wells: relationship between saturated thickness and well yield.Google Scholar
- Hecox GR, Whittemore DO, Buddemeier RW, Wilson BB (2002b) Best estimates of aquifer recharge: magnitude and spatial distributionGoogle Scholar
- Hijioka Y, Matsuoka Y, Nishimoto H et al (2008) Global GHG emissions scenarios under GHG concentration stabilization targets. J Glob Environ Eng 13:97–108Google Scholar
- Hoang TV, Chou TY, Basso B et al (2014) Climate change impact on agricultural productivity environment influence based on simulation model. Int J Adv Remote Sens GIS 3:642–659Google Scholar
- Hornbeck R, Keskin P (2011) The evolving impact of the Ogallala Aquifer: agricultural adaptation to groundwater and climate.Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
- Jones J, Ritchie J (1990) Crop growth models. Manag Farm Irrig Syst Am Soc Agric Eng:63–89Google Scholar
- Maupin MA, Barber NL (2005) Estimated withdrawals from principal aquifers in the United States, 2000.Google Scholar
- McGuire VL (2011) Water-level changes in the High Plains Aquifer, predevelopment to 2009, 2007–08, and 2008–09, and change in water in storage, predevelopment to 2009.Google Scholar
- National Agricultural Statistics Services database (2015) National Agricultural Statistics Services. In: Natl. Agric. Stat. Serv. database. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/.
- Qi SL, Konduris A, Litke DW, Dupree J (2002) Classification of irrigated land using satellite imagery, the High Plains Aquifer, nominal date 1992.Google Scholar
- Ritchie J, Godwin D, Otter-Nacke S (1988) CERES-wheat. A simulation model of wheat growth and development.Google Scholar
- Ritchie J, Singh U, Godwin D, Hunt L (1989) A user’s guide to CERES Maize-V.2.10.Google Scholar
- Shroyer JP, Thompson C, Brown R, et al (1996) Kansas crop planting guide. Kansas State Univ 1–8.Google Scholar
- Smith SJ, Wigley TML (2006) Multi-gas forcing stabilization with Minicam. Energy J 27:373–391Google Scholar
- Stanton JS, Qi SL, Ryter DW, et al (2011) Selected approaches to estimate water-budget components of the High Plains, 1940 through 1949 and 2000 through 2009.Google Scholar
- Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
- Tans P, Keeling R (2016) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Earth Syst. Res. Lab. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html.
- Ulrich J (2016) TTR: technical trading rules.Google Scholar
- Wickham H (2011) The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. J Stat Softw 40:1–29Google Scholar
- Wickham H (2016) tidyr: Easily Tidy Data with “spread ()” and “gather ()” functions.Google Scholar
- Wickham H, Francois R (2015) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation.Google Scholar