Climatic Change

, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 55–66 | Cite as

The problem of the future in postwar Anglo-American political philosophy

  • Katrina ForresterEmail author


Among the conceptual problems raised by climate change is that of how to think about the future. Theories of intergenerational justice and other accounts of obligations to the future in Anglo-American philosophy tend to argue that the remote future matters morally. Where did these arguments come from? This essay explores the roots of contemporary ideas about the remote future in debates that took place among Anglophone philosophers in the 1970s.



For comments I thank Gustaf Arrhenius, Malcolm Bull, Christopher Brooke, Duncan Kelly, Jamie Martin, David Runciman, Sophie Smith, Richard Tuck, Albert Weale, three reviewers and the editors of this issue. Thanks also to Albert Weale, Matt Matravers and John Gray for permission to quote from the Brian Barry Archive, participants of the Cambridge Political Thought Workshop and Princeton Historicizing Climate Change Conference in 2014, and particularly to Jonathan Levy for discussion about uncertainty and the future and Melissa Lane for feedback and encouragement.


  1. Andersson J (2012) The great future debate and the struggle for the world. Am Hist Rev 117(5):1411–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ, Rawls J (1973) Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice. The Journal of Philosophy 70(9):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry B (1975) Contract theory and future generations. Brian Barry Literary Archive. Accessed 8 May 2015
  4. Barry B (1977a) Rawls on average and total utility. Philos Stud 31(5):317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry B (1977b) Justice between generations. In: Hacker PMS, Raz J (eds) Law, morality and society. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 268–284Google Scholar
  6. Barry B (1978) Circumstances of justice and future generations. In: Sikora R, Barry B (eds) Obligations to future generations. Temple, Philadelphia, pp 204–248Google Scholar
  7. Barry B (1983) Intergenerational justice in energy policy. In: Maclean D, Brown PG (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, pp 15–30Google Scholar
  8. Bashford A (2014) Global population. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulding K (1966) The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In: Jarrett H (ed) Environmental quality in a growing economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  10. Baumol WJ (1968) On the social rate of discount. Am Econ Rev 58(4):788–802Google Scholar
  11. Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White Horse Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Callahan D (1971) What obligations do we have to future generations? Am Eccles Rev 164(4):265–281Google Scholar
  13. Caney S (2014) Climate change, intergenerational equity and the social discount rate. Polit Philos Econ 13(4):320–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowen T, Parfit D (1992) Against the social discount rate. In: Laslett P, Fishin J (eds) Justice between age groups and generations. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 144–161Google Scholar
  15. Cronon W (1995) Uncommon ground. W W Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Dasgupta P (1969) On the concept of optimum population. Rev Econ Stud 36(3):295–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. J Risk Uncertain 37(2):141–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deringer (2013) The present value of the distant future in the early modern past. Accessed 9 May 2015
  19. De-Shalit A (1995) Why posterity matters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobb M (1960) An essay on economic growth and planning. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehrlich P (1968) The population bomb. Sierra Club, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. English J (1977) Justice between generations. Philos Stud 31(2):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40(2):351–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galston W (2010) Realism in political theory. Eur J Polit Theo 10(9):385–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilman N (2003) Mandarins of the future. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  26. Golding MP (1972) Obligations to future generations. Monist 56(1):85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodin RE (1985) Protecting the vulnerable. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Gosseries A, Meyer L (2009) (eds) Intergenerational justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Gottlieb R (2005) Forcing the spring. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Gray J (1975) to Barry B, correspondence. Brian Barry Literary Archive. Cabinet 1, Folder 19BGoogle Scholar
  31. Hardin G (1974) Lifeboat ethics: the case against helping the poor. Psychol Today 8:38–43Google Scholar
  32. Hubin D (1976) Justice and future generations. Philos Public Aff 6:70–83Google Scholar
  33. Kavka G (1982) The paradox of future individuals. Philos Public Aff 11:93–112Google Scholar
  34. Keynes JM (1963) Essays in persuasion. W W Norton and Co, New Haven, pp 358–374Google Scholar
  35. Laslett P (1970) The conversation between the generations. R Inst Philos Lect 4:172–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marglin SA (1963) The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Q J Econ 77(1):95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meade J (1964) Efficiency, equality and the ownership of property. George Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Meadows DH et al (1972) The limits to growth. Universe booksGoogle Scholar
  39. Narveson J (1967) Utilitarianism and new generations. Mind 76:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Narveson J (1973) Moral problems of population. Monist 57(1):62–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parfit D (1971) Personal identity. Philos Rev 80(1):3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parfit D (1976) On doing the best for our children. In: Bayles MD (ed) Ethics and population. Schenkman Pub. Co, Cambridge, pp 100–115Google Scholar
  43. Parfit D (1983) Energy policy and the further future: the social discount rate. In: Maclean D, Brown PG (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman and Littlefield, New Jersey, pp 166–179Google Scholar
  44. Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Passmore J (1974) Man’s responsibility for nature. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Pigou AC (1920) Economics of welfare. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Purdy J (2015) After nature. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38(152):543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rawls J (1958) Justice as fairness. Philos Rev 67(2):164–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Richards D (1983) Contractarian theory, intergenerational justice, and energy policy. In: Maclean D, Brown PG (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman and Littlefield, New Jersey, pp 131–150Google Scholar
  52. Robertson T (2012) The Malthusian moment. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  53. Robin L, Sorlin S, Warde P (2013) The future of nature. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson JC (1990) Philosophical origins of the social rate of discount in cost-benefit analysis. Milbank Q 68(2):245–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Samuelson P (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev Econ Stud 4:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sen AK (1967) Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount. Q J Econ 81:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singer P (1976) A utilitarian population principle. In: Bayles MD (ed) Ethics and population. Schenkman Pub. Co., Cambridge, pp 81–99Google Scholar
  58. Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. The Review of Economic Studies 41:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tullock G (1964) The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment: Comment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 78(2):331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walzer M (1970) Obligations. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams B (1984) Personal identity. Lond Rev Books 6(10):14–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations