This paper investigates the effect of a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method on simulated precipitation over the Columbia River Basin using two statistically downscaled climate datasets, i.e., Bias-Correction Spatial Disaggregation (BCSD) and Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA). To this end daily observed and simulated precipitation are used to calculate different indices focusing solely on seasonality, event-timing, and variability in timing (persistence) of the precipitation. The climate model weights are estimated for each cell (6 × 6 km) of the Columbia River Basin using daily time series for the historical period 1970–1999 from the ten Global Climate Models (GCMs) participating to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project platform, Phase 5. The results show that BMA results in more than 15 % improvement/reduction in mean absolute error as compared to the individual GCMs. The improvement is, in general, higher for the MACA models than for the BCSD models. The results of variability in precipitation timing show that extreme precipitation events are mostly not persistent (i.e., occurring in different periods throughout the year), i.e., more than 75 % of the grid cells with an elevation above 900 m indicate persistence values less than 0.2 whereas nearly 70 % of the high elevation cells indicate such low persistence. Further we find that the variability in persistence is higher in high elevation cells than those with low elevation. The picture is different for MACA ensembles as the simulated persistence of extreme precipitation events is higher than that for the observed and BCSD datasets.
Precipitation Amount Precipitation Seasonality Mean Absolute Error Bayesian Model Average Extreme Precipitation Event
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Partial financial support for this study was provided by the DOE-BPA (cooperative agreement 00063182) and also Institute for Sustainable Solution at Portland State University.
Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI et al (2008) Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol 28:2031–2064. doi:10.1002/joc.1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elison Timm O, Giambelluca TW, Diaz HF (2014) Statistical downscaling of rainfall changes in Hawai‘i based on the CMIP5 global model projections. J Geophys Res Atmos. doi:10.1002/2014JD022059Google Scholar
Iizumi T, Nishimori M, Dairaku K et al (2011) Evaluation and intercomparison of downscaled daily precipitation indices over Japan in present-day climate: strengths and weaknesses of dynamical and bias correction-type statistical downscaling methods. J Geophys Res 116:D01111. doi:10.1029/2010JD014513Google Scholar
Li W, Fu R, Dickinson RE (2006) Rainfall and its seasonality over the Amazon in the 21st century as assessed by the coupled models for the IPCC AR4. J Geophys Res Atmos 111:D02111. doi:10.1029/2005JD006355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu Z, Mehran A, Phillips TJ, AghaKouchak A (2014) Seasonal and regional biases in CMIP5 precipitation simulations. Clim Res 60:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livneh B, Rosenberg EA, Lin C et al (2013) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States: update and extensions*Google Scholar
Lute AC, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC (2015) Projected changes in snowfall extremes and interannual variability of snowfall in the western U.S. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1002/2014WR016267Google Scholar
Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2014) Improved Bayesian multimodeling: Integration of copulas and Bayesian model averaging. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1002/2014WR015965Google Scholar
Pal I, Anderson BT, Salvucci GD, Gianotti DJ (2013) Shifting seasonality and increasing frequency of precipitation in wet and dry seasons across the U.S. Geophys Res Lett 40:4030–4035. doi:10.1002/grl.50760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parajka J, Kohnová S, Merz R et al (2009a) Comparative analysis of the seasonality of hydrological characteristics in Slovakia and Austria. Hydrol Sci J 54:456–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parajka J, Kohnová S, Merz R et al (2009b) Comparative analysis of the seasonality of hydrological characteristics in Slovakia and Austria/Analyse comparative de la saisonnalité de caractéristiques hydrologiques en Slovaquie et en Autriche. Hydrol Sci J 54:456–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascale S, Lucarini V, Feng X et al (2014) Analysis of rainfall seasonality from observations and climate models. Clim Dyn 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00382-014-2278-2
Rana A, Moradkhani H (2015) Spatial, temporal and frequency based climate change assessment in Columbia River Basin using multi downscaled-Scenarios. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-015-2857-xGoogle Scholar
Safeeq M, Grant GE, Lewis SL et al (2014) A hydrogeologic framework for characterizing summer streamflow sensitivity to climate warming in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3693–3710. doi:10.5194/hess-18-3693-2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar