Skip to main content

Common human identity and the path to global climate justice

Abstract

With the 2015 summit on global climate change in Paris, political action will (or will not) be taken to tackle the threats of the global climate crisis. Both social scientists as well as conservationists have come to the conclusion that human activity is one of the main reasons for climate change and nature degradation, and the main target of justice related mitigation and adaptation responses. This article puts human (in)activity into focus, and introduces a social identity perspective on environmental justice. Specifically, it shows how conservation scientists can draw from the idea of a common human identity (CHI). It delineates how the representation of a “common human ingroup” could inform beliefs about environmental justice, which in turn should motivate individuals and groups to act in favor of the natural environment. The review highlights that social identification with all humans may represent a potential path to global environmental justice, and combines recent insights from social identity research with conservation behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for this intriguing idea of promoting such symbols (especially the “HOME” symbol) through climate change summits.

References

  1. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Batalha L, Reynolds K (2012) ASPIRing to mitigate climate change: superordinate identity in global climate negotiations. Polit Psychol 743-760

  3. Becker JC, Enders-Comberg A, Wagner U, Christ O, Butz DA (2012) Beware of national symbols: how flags can threaten intergroup relations. Soc Psychol 43:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brewer MB (1991) The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 17:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchan NR, Brewer MB, Grimalda G, Wilson RK, Fatas E, Foddy M (2011) Global social identity and global cooperation. Psychol Sci 22:821–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke MB, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema JA, Lobell DB (2009) Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(49):20670–20674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cialdini RB, Brown SL, Lewis BP, Luce C, Neuberg SL (1997) Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman JS (1987) Microfoundations and macrosocial behavior. In: Alexander JC, Giesen B, Münch R, Smelser NJ (eds) The micro-macro link. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 153–176

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clayton S, Koehn A, Grover E (2013) Making sense of the senseless: identity, justice, and the framing of environmental crises. Soc Justice Res 26:301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Groot JIM, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain environmental attitudes and beliefs: how to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav 40:330–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Groot JIM, Steg L (2009) Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental Behavior? Conserv Lett 2:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eggins RA, Haslam SA, Reynolds KJ (2002) Social identity and negotiation: subgroup representation and superordinate consensus. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 28:887–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franzen A, Vogl D (2013) Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: a comparative analysis of 33 countries. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1001–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fraser N (2009) Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press

  15. Fritsche I, Cohrs JC, Kessler T, Bauer J (2012) Global warming is breeding social conflict: the subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. J Environ Psychol 32(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2005) Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: from aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model. J Soc Issues 61:615–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2014) Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66(4):290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Houlette MA, Gaertner SL, Johnson KM, Banker BS, Riek BM, Dovidio JF (2004) Developing a more inclusive social identity: an elementary school intervention. J Soc Issues 60:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huo YJ, Smith HJ, Tyler TR, Lind A (1996) Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: is separatism the problem; is assimilation the Answer? Psychol Sci 7:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/

  22. Ituarte-Lima C, McDermott CL, Mulyani M (2014) Assessing equity in national legal frameworks for REDD+: the case of Indonesia. Environ Sci Pol 44:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kals E, Russell Y (2001) Individual conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining proenvironmental decision making. Soc Justice Res 14:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher SD (2005) Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 31:443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McDonald RI, Fielding KS, Louis WR (2014) Conflicting social norms and community conservation compliance. J Nat Conserv 22:212–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McFarland S, Webb M, Brown D (2012) All humanity is my ingroup: a measure and studies of identification with all humanity. J Pers Soc Psychol 103(5):830–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Opotow S (1990) Moral exclusion and injustice: an introduction. J Soc Issues 46:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Opotow S, Gerson J, Woodside S (2005) From moral exclusion to moral inclusion: theory for teaching peace. Theory Pract 44(4):303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reese G (2012) When authoritarians protect the earth – authoritarian submission and pro-environmental beliefs: a pilot study in Germany. Ecopsychology 4:232–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reese G and Jacob L (2015) Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: a two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environ Sci Pol 51:88–94

  31. Reese G, Kohlmann F (2015) Feeling global, acting ethically: global identification and fairtrade consumption. J Soc Psychol 155:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reese G, Berthold A, Steffens MC (2012) We are the world – and they are not: prototypicality for the world community, legitimacy, and responses to global inequality. Polit Psychol 33:683–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reese G, Proch J, Cohrs JC (2014) Individual differences in responses to global inequality. Analyses Soc Issues and Public Policy 14:217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reese G, Proch J, Finn C (2015) Identification with all humanity: the role of self-definition and self-investment. Eur J Soc Psychol 45:426–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reser, J.P., Morrissey, S.A., & Ellul, M. (2011). The threat of climate change: Psychological response, adaptation, and impacts. In Climate Change and Human Well-Being (pp. 19–42). Springer New York.

  36. Reysen S, Katzarska-Miller I (2013) A model of global citizenship: antecedents and outcomes. Int J Psychol 48:858–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Riek BM, Mania EW, Gaertner SL, McDonald SA, Lamoreaux MJ (2010) Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Process and Intergroup Relat 13:404–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenmann A, Reese G, Cameron JE (2015) Social identities in a globalized world: challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science

  39. Santarius, T. (2009). Emissionshandel und globale gerechtigkeit [emissions trading and global justice]. In: S. Böhler, D. Bongardt, & S. Frech (Eds.): Jahrhundertproblem Klimawandel. Forschungsstand, Perspektiven, Lösungswege [climatic change as unprecedented problem: research, perspectives, solutions]. Schwalbach, S. 121–138.

  40. Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Schubert R, Schellnhuber HJ (2009) Climate change as a security risk. Routledge

  42. Shilling FM, London JK, Liévanos RS (2009) Marginalization by collaboration: environmental justice as a third party in and beyond CALFED. Environ Sci Pol 12:694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sikor T, Martin A, Fisher J, He J (2014) Toward an empirical analysis of justice in ecosystem governance. Conserv Lett 7:524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Smeekes A, Verkuyten M (2013) Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defense. J Exp Soc Psychol 49(6):984–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stern PC (2011) Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. Am Psychol 66(4):303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Swim J, Clayton S, Doherty T, Gifford R, Howard G, Reser J, … Weber E (2009) Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change, American Psychological Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  47. Syme GJ, Kals E, Nancarrow BE, Montada L (2000) Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: a cross-cultural model. Risk Anal 20(6):905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks Cole, Monterey, CA, pp. 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  49. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  50. Walker G (2012) Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Washburn J (1999) The negotiation of the Rome statute for the international criminal court and international law making in the 21 century. Pace Int Law Rev 11:361–377

    Google Scholar 

  52. Watson JEM (2014) Human responses to climate change will seriously impact biodiversity conservation: it's time we start planning for them. Conserv Lett 7:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wenzel M (2000) Justice and identity: the significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and the justice motive. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26:157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wenzel M (2004) A social categorization approach to distributive justice. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds) European review of social psychology, vol 15. Psychology Press, Hove, UK, pp. 219–257

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Reese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reese, G. Common human identity and the path to global climate justice. Climatic Change 134, 521–531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1548-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Human identity
  • Conservation
  • Climate justice
  • Environmental policy
  • Social identity