Avoided climate impacts of urban and rural heat and cold waves over the U.S. using large climate model ensembles for RCP8.5 and RCP4.5
Previous studies examining future changes in heat/cold waves using climate model ensembles have been limited to grid cell-average quantities. Here, we make use of an urban parameterization in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) that represents the urban heat island effect, which can exacerbate extreme heat but may ameliorate extreme cold in urban relative to rural areas. Heat/cold wave characteristics are derived for U.S. regions from a bias-corrected CESM 30-member ensemble for climate outcomes driven by the RCP8.5 forcing scenario and a 15-member ensemble driven by RCP4.5. Significant differences are found between urban and grid cell-average heat/cold wave characteristics. Most notably, urban heat waves for 1981–2005 are more intense than grid cell-average by 2.1 °C (southeast) to 4.6 °C (southwest), while cold waves are less intense. We assess the avoided climate impacts of urban heat/cold waves in 2061–2080 when following the lower forcing scenario. Urban heat wave days per year increase from 6 in 1981–2005 to up to 92 (southeast) in RCP8.5. Following RCP4.5 reduces heat wave days by about 50 %. Large avoided impacts are demonstrated for individual communities; e.g., the longest heat wave for Houston in RCP4.5 is 38 days while in RCP8.5 there is one heat wave per year that is longer than a month with some lasting the entire summer. Heat waves also start later in the season in RCP4.5 (earliest are in early May) than RCP8.5 (mid-April), compared to 1981–2005 (late May). In some communities, cold wave events decrease from 2 per year for 1981–2005 to one-in-five year events in RCP4.5 and one-in-ten year events in RCP8.5.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Number AGS-1243095. K.W. Oleson was supported in part by NASA grant NNX10AK79G (the SIMMER project) and the NCAR Weather and Climate Impacts Assessment Science Program (WCIASP). G.B. Anderson was supported by NIEHS grants K99ES022631 and R21ES020152. We thank C. Tebaldi and B. O’Neill for comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and J.-F. Lamarque for useful discussions about heat/cold waves. We thank the reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments that substantially improved the manuscript. NCAR is sponsored by the NSF.
- Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J, et al (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Diffenbaugh NS, Ashfaq M (2010) Intensification of hot extremes in the United States. Geophys Res Lett 37:L15701. doi: 10.1029/2010GL043888
- Girvetz EH, Maurer E, Duffy P et al (2012) Making climate data relevant to decision making: the important details of spatial and temporal downscaling. The World Bank Group. http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal. Accessed 01 October 2014
- Kay JE, Deser C, Phillips A, et al (2014) The community earth system model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. B Am Meteorol Soc 96:1333–1349. doi: 10.1175/bams-d-13-00255.1
- Lawrence DM, Oleson KW, Flanner MG et al (2011) Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the community land model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 3:M03001. doi: 10.1029/2011MS000045
- McGinnis S, Nychka D, Mearns LO (2015) A new distribution mapping technique for climate model bias correction. In: Lakshmanan V, Gilleland E, McGovern A, Tingley M (eds.) Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches to Climate Science: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Climate Informatics, Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17220-0_1
- Perkins SE, Fischer EM (2013) The usefulness of different realizations for the model evaluation of regional trends in heat waves. Geophys Res Lett 40:2013GL057833 doi: 10.1002/2013gl057833