Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 615–629 | Cite as

Greenhouse gas emissions from the usage of typical e-products by households: a case study of China

  • Qingbin Song
  • Jinhui Li
Article

Abstract

The number of electric and electronic products (e-products) owned by Chinese households has multiplied in the past decade. In this study, we analyz the GHG emissions from e-products in Chinese households in order to understand and determine how to mitigate their effects on climate change. The results show that the usage stage of e-products has become an important source of GHG emissions in China, with total GHG emissions of these household e-products reaching about 663 million tons CO2 eq., accounting for about 8.85 % of all Chinese GHG emissions in 2012. The average GHG emission per household per year in China was 1538 kg CO2 eq. in 2012, a little higher than that of Norwegian households (1200 kg CO2 eq.). The electricity mix plays a very important role in GHG emissions, and the 78 % coal-fired power consumption accounted for 99.69 % of the total GHG emissions. Our research also supports the view that GHG emissions from household e-products increased with economic level. To reduce the GHG emissions of household e-products, the development of energy-saving e-products and changes to the electricity mix would be very effective measures.

Keywords

Electricity Consumption Usage Stage Chinese Household Unit Energy Consumption Eastern Coastal Province 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was financially supported by the National Key Technologies R&D Program (2014BAC03B04), and a special fund of the State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control (11Z02ESPCT).

Supplementary material

10584_2015_1449_MOESM1_ESM.docx (65 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 65 kb)

References

  1. Akorede MF, Hizam H, Ab Kadir MZA, Aris I, Buba SD (2012) Mitigating the anthropogenic global warming in the electric power industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:2747–2761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrae ASG, Vaija MS (2014) To which degree does sector specific standardization make life cycle assessments comparable?—the case of global warming potential of smartphones. Challenges 5:409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bos JFFP, Jd H, Sukkel W, Schils RLM (2014) Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional farming systems in the Netherlands. NJAS - Wagening J Life Sci 68:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corcoran PM, Andrae ASG (2013) Emerging trends in electricity consumption for consumer ICT. Report from NUI Galway, Ireland. Available online: http://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/xmlui/handle/10379/3563
  5. Dahowski RT, Davidson CL, Li XC, Wei N (2012) A $70/tCO2 greenhouse gas mitigation backstop for China’s industrial and electric power sectors: insights from a comprehensive CCS cost curve. Int J Greenh Gas Control 11:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dones R, Bauer C, Bolliger R, Burger B, Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, … & Tuchschmid M (2007) Life cycle inventories of energy systems: results for current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries. Ecoinvent Rep 5(5)Google Scholar
  7. Duan H, Eugster M, Hischier R, Streicher-Porte M, Li J (2009) Life cycle assessment study of a Chinese desktop personal computer. Sci Total Environ 407:1755–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duan H, Miller TR, Gregory J, Kirchain R (2014) Quantifying export flows of used electronics: advanced methods to resolve used goods within trade data. Environ Sci Technol 48:3263–3271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EC (European Commission) (2014) Eco-design of energy-related products. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/ecodesign/eco_design_en.htm
  10. Evans L, Milfont TL, Lawrence J (2014) Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate. Glob Environ Chang 25:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang W, Yang Y, Xu Z (2013) PM10 and PM2.5 and health risk assessment for heavy metals in a typical factory for cathode ray tube television recycling. Environ Sci Technol 47:12469–12476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng C, Gao X, Wu J, Tang Y, He J, Qi Y, Zhang Y (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions investigation for towns in China: a case study of Xiaolan. J Clean Prod 103:130–139Google Scholar
  13. Gnansounou E, Dong J, Bedniaguine D (2004) The strategic technology options for mitigating CO2 emissions in power sector: assessment of Shanghai electricity-generating system. Ecological Economics 50:117–133Google Scholar
  14. Hertwich EG, Roux C (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions from the consumption of electric and electronic equipment by Norwegian households. Environ Sci Technol 45:8190–8196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hikwama BP (2005) Life cycle assessment of a personal computer. Bachelor Thesis of Southern Queensland University, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaccard M, Tu J (2011) Show some enthusiasm, but not too much: carbon capture and storage development prospects in China. Glob Environ Chang 21:402–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li J, Tian B, Liu T, Liu H, Wen X, Si H (2006) Status quo of e-waste management in mainland China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 8:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Ou X, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Zhang X (2013) Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission intensity of dominant secondary energy pathways of China in 2010. Energy 50:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li J, Zeng X, Stevels A (2015) Ecodesign in consumer electronics: past, present and future. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45(8):840–860Google Scholar
  20. Liu Z, Guan D, Crawford-Brown D, Zhang Q, He K, Liu J (2013) Energy policy: a low-carbon road map for China. Nature 500:143–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2013) Chinese statistical yearbook (2003–2012). http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2013/indexch.htm
  22. Park W Y (2011) TV energy consumption trends and energy-efficiency improvement options. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL5024-EGoogle Scholar
  23. PRé (2014) World’s leading LCA software. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro
  24. Song Q, Li J (2014) A systematic review of the human body burden of e-waste exposure in China. Environ Int 68C:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song Q, Wang Z, Li J (2012a) Residents’ behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau. J Environ Manag 106:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Song Q, Wang Z, Li J, Yuan W (2012b) Life cycle assessment of desktop PCs in Macau. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Song Q, Wang Z, Li J, Zeng X (2012c) Life cycle assessment of TV sets in China: a case study of the impacts of CRT monitors. Waste Manag 32:1926–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vennemo H, Aunan K, Jinghua F, Holtedahl P, Tao H, Seip HM (2006) Domestic environmental benefits of China’s energy-related CDM potential. Clim Chang 75:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu Z, Zhang H, Krause CM, Cobb NS (2010) Climate change and human activities: a case study in Xinjiang, China. Clim Chang 99:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang J, Chen B (2013) Integrated evaluation of embodied energy, greenhouse gas emission and economic performance of a typical wind farm in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 27:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeng L, Yu Y, Li J (2014) China’s promoting energy-efficient products for the benefit of the people program in 2012: results and analysis of the consumer impact study. Appl Energy 133:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou W (2006) How developing countries can engage in GHG reduction: a case study for China. Sustain Sci 1:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of EnvironmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations