Modelling the effects of cross-sectoral water allocation schemes in Europe
- 651 Downloads
Future renewable water resources are likely to be insufficient to meet water demand for human use and minimum environmental flow requirements in many European regions. Hence, fair and equitable water allocation to different water use sectors and environmental needs is important for climate change adaptation in order to reduce negative effects on human well-being and aquatic ecosystems. We applied a system of coupled sectoral metamodels of water availability and water use in the domestic, manufacturing industry, electricity generation, and agricultural sectors to simulate the effects of generic water allocation schemes (WAS) at the European level. The relative performance of WAS in balancing adverse impacts on the water use sectors and aquatic ecosystems was analysed for an ensemble of 16 scenarios for the 2050s, which were built from the combination of four socio-economic scenarios, developed in the CLIMSAVE project, and four climate projections based on IPCC A1. The results indicate that significant physical water shortages may result from climate and socio-economic change in many regions of Europe, particularly in the Mediterranean. In the energy sector, average annual water demand can largely be met even in water allocation schemes that deprioritise the sector. However, prioritisation of agricultural water demand has significant adverse impacts on the domestic and manufacturing industry sectors. Cross-sectoral impacts were found to be lowest if at least one of the domestic and manufacturing sectors is assigned higher priority than agriculture. We conclude that adapting spatial patterns of water-intensive activities to renewable water availability across Europe, such as shifting irrigated agriculture to less water-stressed basins, could be an effective demand-side adaptation measure, and thus a candidate for support through EU policy.
KeywordsWater Demand Water Allocation Impact Indicator Renewable Water Resource Water Allocation Scheme
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 244031 (The CLIMSAVE Project; Climate change integrated assessment methodology for cross-sectoral adaptation and vulnerability in Europe; www.climsave.eu). CLIMSAVE is an endorsed project of the Global Land Project of the IGBP. We thank Jennifer Koch, North Carolina State University – NC, USA and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
- Audsley E, Trnka M, Sabaté S, Sanchez A (2014) Interactively modelling land profitability to estimate European agricultural and forest land use under future scenarios of climate, socio-economics and adaptation. Climatic Change (under review)Google Scholar
- De Roo A, Burek P, Gentile A, Udias A, Bouraoui F, Aloe A, Bianchi A, La Notte A, Kuik O, Tenreiro JE, Vandecasteele I, Mubareka S, Baranzelli C, van der Perk M, Lavalle C, Bidoglio G (2012) A multi-criteria optimisation of scenarios for the protection of water resources in Europe: Support to the EU Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Waters. Eur Comm Jt Res Cent Inst Environ Sustain. JRC75919, ISBN 978-92-79-27025-3Google Scholar
- Dinar A, Rosegrant MW, Meinzen-Dick R (1997) Water allocation mechanisms – principles and examples. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. 1779. World Bank, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-1779
- Dubrovsky M, Trnka M, Holman IP, Svobodova E (2014) Creating a reduced-form ensemble of climate change scenarios for Europe representing known uncertainties. Climatic change (under review)Google Scholar
- European Union (2000) “Water framework directive.” Directive 2000/60/EU, EU Publications, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Harrison PA, Holman IP, Berry PM (2014a) Assessing cross-sectoral climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation: An Introduction to the CLIMSAVE project. Climatic Change (under review)Google Scholar
- Harrison PA, Dunford R, Holman IP et al. (2014b) Cross-sectoral implications of different climatic and socio-economic scenario futures in Europe. Climatic change (under review)Google Scholar
- Kok K, Bärlund I, Flörke M, Gramberger M, Holman I, Sendzimir J, Stuch B, Zellmer K (2014) European participatory scenario development: Strengthening the link between stories and models. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1143-y
- Kossida M, Kakava A, Tekidou A, Iglesias A, Mimikou M (2012) Vulnerability to Water Scarcity and Drought in Europe. Thematic assessment for EEA 2012 Report. ETC./ICM Technical Report 2012/3. ISBN 978-80-85087-13-0Google Scholar
- Richter B (2010) Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Res Appl 26:1052–1063Google Scholar
- Verzano K (2009) Climate change impacts on flood related hydrological processes: Further development and application of a global scale hydrological model. Reports on Earth System Science, 71–2009, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, HamburgGoogle Scholar