Climatic Change

, Volume 128, Issue 3–4, pp 229–244 | Cite as

Modelling the effects of cross-sectoral water allocation schemes in Europe

  • Florian Wimmer
  • Eric Audsley
  • Marcus Malsy
  • Cristina Savin
  • Robert Dunford
  • Paula A. Harrison
  • Rüdiger Schaldach
  • Martina Flörke


Future renewable water resources are likely to be insufficient to meet water demand for human use and minimum environmental flow requirements in many European regions. Hence, fair and equitable water allocation to different water use sectors and environmental needs is important for climate change adaptation in order to reduce negative effects on human well-being and aquatic ecosystems. We applied a system of coupled sectoral metamodels of water availability and water use in the domestic, manufacturing industry, electricity generation, and agricultural sectors to simulate the effects of generic water allocation schemes (WAS) at the European level. The relative performance of WAS in balancing adverse impacts on the water use sectors and aquatic ecosystems was analysed for an ensemble of 16 scenarios for the 2050s, which were built from the combination of four socio-economic scenarios, developed in the CLIMSAVE project, and four climate projections based on IPCC A1. The results indicate that significant physical water shortages may result from climate and socio-economic change in many regions of Europe, particularly in the Mediterranean. In the energy sector, average annual water demand can largely be met even in water allocation schemes that deprioritise the sector. However, prioritisation of agricultural water demand has significant adverse impacts on the domestic and manufacturing industry sectors. Cross-sectoral impacts were found to be lowest if at least one of the domestic and manufacturing sectors is assigned higher priority than agriculture. We conclude that adapting spatial patterns of water-intensive activities to renewable water availability across Europe, such as shifting irrigated agriculture to less water-stressed basins, could be an effective demand-side adaptation measure, and thus a candidate for support through EU policy.


Water Demand Water Allocation Impact Indicator Renewable Water Resource Water Allocation Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 244031 (The CLIMSAVE Project; Climate change integrated assessment methodology for cross-sectoral adaptation and vulnerability in Europe; CLIMSAVE is an endorsed project of the Global Land Project of the IGBP. We thank Jennifer Koch, North Carolina State University – NC, USA and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10584_2014_1161_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 26.2 kb)


  1. Alcamo J, Döll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rösch T, Siebert S (2003) Development and testing of the WaterGAP2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrol Sci J 48:317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcamo J, Flörke M, Märker M (2007) Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes. Hydrol Sci J 52(2):247–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnell N, van Vuuren DP, Isaac M (2011) The implications of climate policy for the impacts of climate change on global water resources. Glob Environ Chang 21:592–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audsley E, Trnka M, Sabaté S, Sanchez A (2014) Interactively modelling land profitability to estimate European agricultural and forest land use under future scenarios of climate, socio-economics and adaptation. Climatic Change (under review)Google Scholar
  5. Davis DM (2007) Integrated water resources management and water sharing. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133:427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Roo A, Burek P, Gentile A, Udias A, Bouraoui F, Aloe A, Bianchi A, La Notte A, Kuik O, Tenreiro JE, Vandecasteele I, Mubareka S, Baranzelli C, van der Perk M, Lavalle C, Bidoglio G (2012) A multi-criteria optimisation of scenarios for the protection of water resources in Europe: Support to the EU Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Waters. Eur Comm Jt Res Cent Inst Environ Sustain. JRC75919, ISBN 978-92-79-27025-3Google Scholar
  7. Dinar A, Rosegrant MW, Meinzen-Dick R (1997) Water allocation mechanisms – principles and examples. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. 1779. World Bank, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-1779
  8. Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270:105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubrovsky M, Trnka M, Holman IP, Svobodova E (2014) Creating a reduced-form ensemble of climate change scenarios for Europe representing known uncertainties. Climatic change (under review)Google Scholar
  10. European Union (2000) “Water framework directive.” Directive 2000/60/EU, EU Publications, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  11. Flörke M, Kynast E, Bärlund I, Eisner S, Wimmer F, Alcamo J (2013) Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: a global simulation study. Glob Environ Chang 23:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison PA, Holman IP, Cojocaru G, Kok K, Kontogianni A, Metzger M, Gramberger M (2013) Combining qualitative and quantitative understanding for exploring cross-sectoral climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in Europe. Reg Environ Chang 13:761–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison PA, Holman IP, Berry PM (2014a) Assessing cross-sectoral climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation: An Introduction to the CLIMSAVE project. Climatic Change (under review)Google Scholar
  14. Harrison PA, Dunford R, Holman IP et al. (2014b) Cross-sectoral implications of different climatic and socio-economic scenario futures in Europe. Climatic change (under review)Google Scholar
  15. Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resour Manag 21:775–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iglesias A, Quiroga S, Moneo M, Garrote L (2012) From climate change impacts to the development of adaptation strategies: challenges for agriculture in Europe. Clim Chang 112:143–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kok K, Bärlund I, Flörke M, Gramberger M, Holman I, Sendzimir J, Stuch B, Zellmer K (2014) European participatory scenario development: Strengthening the link between stories and models. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1143-y
  18. Kondili E, Kaldellis JK, Papapostolou (2010) A novel systematic approach to water resources optimisation in areas with limited water resources. Desalination 250:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kossida M, Kakava A, Tekidou A, Iglesias A, Mimikou M (2012) Vulnerability to Water Scarcity and Drought in Europe. Thematic assessment for EEA 2012 Report. ETC./ICM Technical Report 2012/3. ISBN 978-80-85087-13-0Google Scholar
  20. Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of tends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438(7066):347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchell TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25:693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richter B (2010) Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Res Appl 26:1052–1063Google Scholar
  23. Rosegrant MW, Ringler C, Zhu T (2009) Water for agriculture: maintaining food security under growing scarcity. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott CA, Vicuña S, Blanco-Gutiérrez I, Meza F, Varela-Ortega C (2014) Irrigation efficiency and water-policy implications for river basin resilience. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1339–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sechi GM, Zucca R, Zuddas P (2013) Water costs allocation in complex systems using a cooperative game theory approach. Water Resour Manag 27:1781–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strzepek K, Boehlert B (2010) Competition for water for the food system. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2927–2940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Verzano K (2009) Climate change impacts on flood related hydrological processes: Further development and application of a global scale hydrological model. Reports on Earth System Science, 71–2009, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  29. Wada Y, van Beek LPH, Viviroli D, Dürr HH, Weingartner R, Bierkens MFP (2011) Global monthly water stress: 2. Water demand and severity of water stress. Water Resour Res 47:W07518. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009792 Google Scholar
  30. Wang L, Fang L, Hipel KW (2007) Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation. Eur J Oper Res. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.045 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Wimmer
    • 1
  • Eric Audsley
    • 2
  • Marcus Malsy
    • 1
  • Cristina Savin
    • 3
  • Robert Dunford
    • 4
  • Paula A. Harrison
    • 4
  • Rüdiger Schaldach
    • 1
  • Martina Flörke
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Environmental Systems ResearchUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
  2. 2.Natural Resources DepartmentCranfield UniversityCranfieldUK
  3. 3.TIAMASG FoundationBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Environmental Change InstituteOxford University Centre for the EnvironmentOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations