ENSO anomalies over the Western United States: present and future patterns in regional climate simulations
Surface temperature, precipitation, specific humidity and wind anomalies associated with the warm and cold phases of ENSO simulated by WRF and HadRM are examined for the present and future decades. WRF is driven by ECHAM5 and CCSM3, respectively, and HadRM is driven by HadCM3. For the current decades, all simulations show some capability in resolving the observed warm-dry and cool-wet teleconnection patterns over the PNW and the Southwest U.S. for warm and cold ENSO. Differences in the regional simulations originate primarily from the respective driving fields. For the future decades, the warm-dry and cool-wet teleconnection patterns in association with ENSO are still represented in ECHAM5-WRF and HadRM. However, there are indications of changes in the ENSO teleconnection patterns for CCSM3-WRF in the future, with wet anomalies dominating in the PNW and the Southwest U.S. for both warm and cold ENSO, in contrast to the canonical patterns of precipitation anomalies. Interaction of anomalous wind flow with local terrain plays a critical role in the generation of anomalous precipitation over the western U.S. Anomalous dry conditions are always associated with anomalous airflow that runs parallel to local mountains and wet conditions with airflow that runs perpendicular to local mountains. Future changes in temperature and precipitation associated with the ENSO events in the regional simulations indicate varying responses depending on the variables examined as well as depending on the phase of ENSO.
KeywordsPrecipitation Anomaly Wind Anomaly ENSO Event Snow Water Equivalent Teleconnection Pattern
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Collins WD, Rasch PJ, Boville BA, Hack JJ, McCaa JR, Williamson DL, Kiehl JT, Briegleb B, Bitz C, Lin S-J, Zhang M, Dai Y (2004) Description of the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model (CAM 3.0). NCAR Tech Note, NCAR/TN-464+STR, 226Google Scholar
- Cubash U et al (2001) Projections of future climate change. Chapter 9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report on the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 ppGoogle Scholar
- Jones RG, Noguer M, Hassel DC, Hudson D, Wilson SS, Jenkins GJ, Mitchell JFB (2004) Generating high resolution climate change scenarios using PRECIS. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, 40 ppGoogle Scholar
- Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain-Fritsch scheme. In: Emanuel KA, Raymond DJ (eds) The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 165–170Google Scholar
- Mass, CF (2008) The weather of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Meehl GA et al (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (Eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Mote PW, Hamlet AF, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Declining mountain snowpack in Western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 48:39–49Google Scholar
- Nakicenovic N et al (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Qian Y, Ghan SJ, Leung LR (2010) Downscaling hydroclimate change over Western U.S. based on CAM subgrid scheme and WRF regional climate simulations. Int J Climatol 30:675–693Google Scholar
- Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornbleuh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tomkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5, part I: model description. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Report No 349Google Scholar
- Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2006) A description of the advanced research WRF version 2. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-468+STR, 88 ppGoogle Scholar