Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp 393–405 | Cite as

A relation between extreme daily precipitation and extreme short term precipitation

  • Yanina L. Romero
  • J. Bessembinder
  • N. C. van de Giesen
  • F. H. M. van de Ven
Open Access
Article

Abstract

The Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) has published the KNMI’06 climate scenarios in 2006. These scenarios give the possible states of the climate in The Netherlands for the next century. Projections of changes in precipitation were made for a time scale of 1 day. The urban drainage sector is, however, more interested in projections on shorter time scales. Specifically, time scales of 1 h or less. The aim of this research is to provide projections of precipitation at these shorter time scales based on the available daily scenarios. This involves an analysis of climate variables and their relations to precipitation at different time scales. On the basis of this analysis, one can determine a numeric factor to translate daily projections into shorter time scale projections.

Keywords

Climate Scenario Daily Precipitation Extreme Precipitation Maximum Daily Temperature Average Daily Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chang CB (1998) A case study of excessive rainfall forecasting. Meteorol Atmos Phys 66(3–4):215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doswell CA III, Brooks HE, Maddox RA (1996) Flash flood forecasting: an ingredients-based methodology. Weather Forecast 11:560–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gallego MC, García JA, Vaquero JM (2005) The NAO signal in daily rainfall series over the Iberian Peninsula. Clim Res 29:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Graf WL (1977) Network characteristics in suburbanizing streams. Water Resour Res 13(2):459–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heijboer D, Nellestijn J (2002) (KNMI), Klimaatatlas Van Nederland, De Normaalperiode 1971–2000, Elmar B.V., RijswijkGoogle Scholar
  6. Kundzewicz ZW, Mata LJ, Arnell NW, Döll P, Kabat P, Jiménez B, Miller KA, Oki T, Sen Z, Shiklomanov IA (2007) Freshwater resources and their management. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 173–210Google Scholar
  7. Lenderink G, van Meijgaard E (2008) Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nature Geoscience 1(8)Google Scholar
  8. Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Tebaldi C (2005) Understanding future patterns of increased precipitation intensity in climate model simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32:L18719. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meehl GA, Stocker TF et al (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–846Google Scholar
  10. Mitchell RM, Phillips ID (2006) Warm season extreme precipitation events at Sunderland 1940–2000, the royal meteorological society. Weather 61(8)Google Scholar
  11. Ntelekos AA, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Krajewski WF, Miller AJ, Goska R (2008) Extreme hydrometeorological events and the urban environment: dissecting the 7 July 2004 thunderstorm over the Baltimore MD Metropolitan Region. Water Resour Res 44:W08446. doi: 10.1029/2007WR006346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Overeem A, Buishand A, Holleman I (2008) Rainfall depth-duration-frequency curves and their uncertainties. J Hydrol 348:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phillips ID, McGregor GR (2001) The relationship between synoptic scale airflow direction and daily rainfall: a methodology applied to Devon and Cornwall, South West England. Theor Appl Climatol 69:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (2006) Climate change scenarios 2006 for The Netherlands. Scientific Report, WR 2006–01. De Bilt, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith JA, Baeck ML, Morrison JE, Sturdevant-Rees P, Turner-Gillespie DF, Bates PD (2002) The regional hydrology of extreme floods in an urbanizing drainage. J Hydrometeorol 3(3):267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. STOWA (2004) Statistiek van Extreme Neerslag in Nederland, report nr. 26, Hageman Fulfilment. http://www.stowa.nl/uploads /themadownloads2/mID_4910_cID_3900_STOWA_rapport_2004_26.pdf. Accessed June 29 2007
  17. Waters D, Watt WE, Marsalek J, Anderson BC (2003) Adaptation of a storm drainage system to accommodate increased rainfall resulting from climate change. J Environ Plan Manag 46:755–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanina L. Romero
    • 1
    • 4
  • J. Bessembinder
    • 2
  • N. C. van de Giesen
    • 1
  • F. H. M. van de Ven
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Water ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteDe BiltThe Netherlands
  3. 3.DeltaresDelftThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Waterboard Aa and MaasPP ’s-HertogenboschThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations