Climatic Change

, Volume 102, Issue 1–2, pp 103–128 | Cite as

Effects of projected climate change on energy supply and demand in the Pacific Northwest and Washington State

  • Alan F. Hamlet
  • Se-Yeun Lee
  • Kristian E. B. Mickelson
  • Marketa M. Elsner


Climate strongly affects energy supply and demand in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) and Washington State (WA). We evaluate potential effects of climate change on the seasonality and annual amount of PNW hydropower production, and on heating and cooling energy demand. Changes in hydropower production are estimated by linking simulated streamflow scenarios produced by a hydrology model to a simulation model of the Columbia River hydro system. Changes in energy demand are assessed using gridded estimates of heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree days (CDD) which are then combined with population projections to create energy demand indices that respond both to climate, future population, and changes in residential air conditioning market penetration. We find that substantial changes in the amount and seasonality of energy supply and demand in the PNW are likely to occur over the next century in response to warming, precipitation changes, and population growth. By the 2040s hydropower production is projected to increase by 4.7–5.0% in winter, decrease by about 12.1–15.4% in summer, with annual reductions of 2.0–3.4%. Larger decreases of 17.1–20.8% in summer hydropower production are projected for the 2080s. Although the combined effects of population growth and warming are projected to increase heating energy demand overall (22–23% for the 2020s, 35–42% for the 2040s, and 56–74% for the 2080s), warming results in reduced per capita heating demand. Residential cooling energy demand (currently less than one percent of residential demand) increases rapidly (both overall and per capita) to 4.8–9.1% of the total demand by the 2080s due to increasing population, cooling degree days, and air conditioning penetration.


Energy Demand Hydropower Production Columbia River Basin Electrical Energy Demand Cooling Energy Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balk D, Yetman G (2004) The global distribution of population: evaluating the gains in resolution refinement. Center for International Earth Science Information Network. Columbia University, Palisades, NY.
  2. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), NPD, US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), PNR (1994) The Columbia River system: the inside story. Report DOE/BP-1689, published by the USACE, USBR and BPAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonneville Power Administration (2004) 2000 level modified streamflow, 1928–1999; Bonneville Power Administration, MayGoogle Scholar
  4. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) (2005) Gridded population of the world version 3 (GPWv3): population grids. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University. (11/2008)
  5. Daly C, Neilson R, Phillips D (1994) A statistical–topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 33:140–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsner MM, Cuo L, Voisin N, Deems JS, Hamlet AF, Vano JA, Mickelson KEB, Lee SY, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State. Clim Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9855-0 Google Scholar
  7. Hamlet AF (2003) The role of transboundary agreements in the Columbia River basin: an integrated assessment in the context of historic development, climate, and evolving water policy, Climate and Water: Transboundary Challenges in the Americas. In: Diaz H, Morehouse B (eds). Kluwer Press, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (1999) Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35(6):1597–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Producing temporally consistent daily precipitation and temperature fields for the continental US. J Hydrometeorol 6(3):330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee SY, Hamlet AF, Fitzgerald CJ, Burges SJ, Lettenmaier DP (2009) Optimized flood control in the Columbia River basin for a global warming scenario. ASCE J Water Resour Plan Manage 135(6):440–450. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(440) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res 99(D7):14, 415–14, 428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mantua N, Hare S, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis R (1997) A pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78(6):1069–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mantua N, Tohver IM, Hamlet AF (2010) Climate change impacts on streamflow extremes and summertime stream temperature and their possible consequences for freshwater salmon habitat in Washington State. Clim Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9845-2 Google Scholar
  14. Mote PW, Salathé EP Jr (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest. Clim Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9848-z Google Scholar
  15. Nakićenović N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 599.
  16. NWPCC (2005) Northwest Power and Conservation Council, the fifth Northwest electric power and conservation plan, appendix N. Effects of climate change on the hydroelectric system, May.
  17. Payne JT, Wood AW, Hamlet AF, Palmer RN, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Mitigating the effects of climate change on the water resources of the Columbia River basin. Clim Change 62(1–3):233–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sailor DJ, Munoz JR (1997) Sensitivity of electricity and natural gas consumption to climate in the USA—methodology and results for eight states. Energy 22(10):987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sailor DJ, Pavlova AA (2003) Air conditioning market saturation and long-term response of residential cooling energy demand to climate change. Energy 28(2003):941–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snover AK, Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2003) Climate change scenarios for water planning studies. BAMS 84(11):1513–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Voisin N, Hamlet AF, Graham LP, Pierce DW, Barnett TP, Lettenmaier DP (2006) The role of climate forecasts in western US power planning. J Appl Meteorol 45(5):653–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Westerling A, Barnett T, Gershunov A, Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP, Lu N, Rosenberg E, Steinemann AC (2008) Climate forecasts for improving management of energy and hydropower resources in the western US. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program. CEC-500-2008-XXXGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitely Binder LC, Barcelos JK, Booth DB, Darzen M, Elsner MM, Fenske R, Graham TF, Hamlet AF, Hodges-Howell J, Jackson JE, Karr C, Keys PW, Littell JS, Mantua N, Marlow J, McKenzie D, Robinson-Dorn M, Rosenberg EA, Stöckle CO, Vano JA (2010) Preparing for climate change in Washington State. Clim Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9850-5 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© U.S. Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan F. Hamlet
    • 1
    • 2
  • Se-Yeun Lee
    • 1
  • Kristian E. B. Mickelson
    • 3
  • Marketa M. Elsner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Center for Science in the Earth System, Climate Impacts GroupUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle DistrictSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations