Climatic Change

, Volume 89, Issue 3–4, pp 207–218 | Cite as

Stern’s Review and Adam’s fallacy

  • Carlo Jaeger
  • Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
  • Victor Brovkin
Open Access


The Stern Review has played an enormous role in making the world of business aware of the challenge of long-term climate change. In order to make real progress on the basis of this awareness, it is important to pay attention to the difference between human suffering and losses of gross domestic product (GDP). The Review has compared climate change to experiences of suffering like World War I. That war, however, hardly affected global GDP. The long-term damages to be expected from business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions include loss of the coastal cities of the world over the next millennia. This would be an act of unprecedented barbarism, regardless of whether it would slow down economic growth or perhaps even accelerate it. Business leaders worried about climate change need to pay attention to the tensions between ethical and economic concerns. Otherwise, a credibility crisis threatens global climate policy. An important step to establish the credibility needed for effective climate policy will be to gradually move towards a regime where emission permits are auctioned, not handed out as hidden subsidies. The revenues generated by permit auctions should be used to establish a global system of regional climate funds.


  1. Archer D (2006) Global warming: understanding the forecast. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer D, Buffett B (2005) Time-dependent response of the global ocean clathrate reservoir to climatic and anthropogenic forcing. Geochem, Geophys, Geosystems 6:Q03002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow K (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58:328–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asheim GB, Froyn CB, Hovi J, Menz F (2006) Regional versus global cooperation for climate control. J Environ Econ Manage 51:93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwati J (2006) A global warming fund could succeed where Kyoto failed. Financ Times, August 15Google Scholar
  6. Cox PM, Huntingford C, Jones CD (2006) Conditions for sink-to-source transitions and runaway feedbacks from the land carbon-cycle. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. DeCanio S (2003) Economic models of climate change, a critique. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley DK (2006) Adam’s fallacy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedlingstein P, et al (2006) Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Climate 19:3337–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13Google Scholar
  11. Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregory JM, Huybrechts P, Raper SCB (2004) Climatology: threatened loss of the greenland ice-sheet. Nature 428:616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasselmann K, Latif M, Hooss G, Azar C, Edenhofer O, Jaeger CC, Johannessen MO, Kemfert C, Welp M, Wokaun A (2006) The challenge of long-term climate change. In: Kennedy D (ed) Science magazine’s state of the planet 2006–2007. Island, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Hirschfeld G (ed) (2003) Enzyklopaedie Erster Weltkrieg. Schöningh, PaderbornGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoegh-Guldberg O (1999) Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Mar Freshw Res 50:839–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ikenberry GJ (2008) The rise of China and the future of the west. Foreign Aff 87:23–37Google Scholar
  17. Jaeger C (2004) Combining mitigation and adaptation. In: Michel D (ed) Climate policy for the 21st Century. Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaeger CC, Renn O, Rosa EA, Webler T (2001) Risk, uncertainty, and rational action. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaffee DM, Russell T (1997) Catastrophe insurance, capital markets, and uninsurable risks. J Risk Insur 64:205–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirman A (2006) Demand theory and general equilibrium: from explanation to introspection, a journey down the wrong road. Institute for Advanced Study, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenton TM, et al (2004) Group report: long-term geosphere-biosphere coeveolution and astrobiology. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Crutzen PJ, Clark WC, Claussen M, Held H (eds) Earth system analysis for sustainability: report on the 91st Dahlem Workshop. MIT in cooperation with Dahlem University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Madison A (1979) Per capita output in the long run. Kyklos 32:424–429Google Scholar
  23. Morgan MG (2000) Managing carbon from the bottom up. Science 289:2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nehring K (2006) Self-control through second-order preferences. University of California, Davis. Accessed at
  25. Nordhaus WD (2006) A review of the stern review on the economics of global warming. Yale University, New Haven. Accessed at
  26. Nordhaus WD, Boyer JG (1998) Requiem for Kyoto: an economic analysis of the Kyoto Protocol, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers No. 1201. Cowles Foundation, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or doing it later. Am Econ Rev 89:103–124Google Scholar
  28. Oppenheimer M (1998) Global warming and the stability of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Nature 393:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oppenheimer M, Alley RB (2005) Ice sheets, global warming, and Article 2 of the UNFCCC. Clim Change 68:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Putnam H (2002) The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahmstorf S (2007) A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science (Express), doi:10.1126/science.1135456
  32. Rogner HH (1997) An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu Rev Energy Environ 22:217–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheffer M, Brovkin V, Cox PM (2006) Positive feedback between global warming and atmospheric CO2 concentration inferred from past climate change. Geophys Res Lett 33:L10702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenocic N (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Shiller RJ (2006) Tools for financial innovations: neoclassical versus behavioral finance. Financ Rev 41:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smythe TW (2004) Problems about corporate moral personhood. J Value Inq 19:327–333Google Scholar
  37. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Tol R, Bohn MT, Downing TE, Guillerminet ML, Hizsnyik E, Kasperson RE, et al (2006) Adaptation to 5 m of sea-level rise. J Risk Res 9:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tullock G (1987) Rent seeking. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds) The New Palgrave, vol. 4. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Victor DG (2001) The collapse of the Kyoto protocol and the struggle to slow global warming. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  41. Victor DG, House JC, Joy S (2005) A Madisonian approach to climate policy. Science 309:1820–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Jaeger
    • 1
  • Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
    • 1
    • 2
  • Victor Brovkin
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.PIK–Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Oxford UniversityOxfordEngland
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for MeteorologyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations