Advertisement

Climatic Change

, 91:171 | Cite as

Global estimates of the impact of a collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet: an application of FUND

  • Robert J. Nicholls
  • Richard S. J. Tol
  • Athanasios T. Vafeidis
Article

Abstract

The threat of an abrupt and extreme rise in sea level is widely discussed in the media, but little understood in practise, especially the likely impacts of such a rise including a potential adaptation response. This paper explores for the first time the global impacts of extreme sea-level rise, triggered by a hypothetical collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS). As the potential contributions remain uncertain, a wide range of scenarios are explored: WAIS contributions to sea-level rise of between 0.5 and 5 m/century. Together with other business-as-usual sea-level contributions, in the worst case this gives an approximately 6-m rise of global-mean sea level from 2030 to 2130. Global exposure to extreme sea-level rise is significant: it is estimated that roughly 400 million people (or about 8% of global population) are threatened by a 5-m rise in sea level, just based on 1995 data. The coastal module within the Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution (FUND) model is tuned with global data on coastal zone characteristics concerning population, land areas and land use, and then used for impact analysis under the extreme sea-level rise scenarios. The model considers the interaction of (dry)land loss, wetland loss, protection costs and human displacement, assuming perfect adaptation based on cost-benefit analysis. Unlike earlier analyses, response costs are represented in a non-linear manner, including a sensitivity analysis based on response costs. It is found that much of the world’s coast would be abandoned given these extreme scenarios, although according to the global model, significant lengths of the world’s coast are worth defending even in the most extreme case. This suggests that actual population displacement would be a small fraction of the potential population displacement, and is consistent with the present distribution of coastal population, which is heavily concentrated in specific areas. Hence, a partial defence can protect most of the world’s coastal population. However, protection costs rise substantially diverting large amounts of investment from other sectors, and large areas of (dry)land and coastal wetlands are still predicted to be lost. Detailed case studies of the WAIS collapse in the Netherlands, Thames Estuary and the Rhone delta suggest greater abandonment than shown by the global model, probably because the model assumes perfect implementation of coastal protection and does not account for negative feedbacks when implementation is imperfect. The significant impacts found in the global model together with the potential for greater impacts as found in the detailed case studies shows that the response to abrupt sea-level rise is worthy of further research.

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product Wetland Loss Coastal Protection Land Loss Cost Increase Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barnett J, Adger NW (2003) Climate dangers and atoll nations. Clim Change 61:321–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bijlsma L, Crawford M, Ehler C, Hoozemans FMJ, Jones V, Klein RJT, Mieremet B, Mimura N, Misdorp R, Nicholls RJ, Ries K, Spradley J, Stive M, de Vrees L, Westmacott S (1994) Preparing to meet the coastal challenges of the 21st century-conference report world coast conference 1993. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change/Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijlsma L, Ehler CN, Klein RJT, Kulshrestha SM, McLean RF, Mimura N, Nicholls RJ, Nurse LA, Perez Nieto H, Stakhiv EZ, Turner RK, Warrick RA (1996) Coastal zones and small islands. In: Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (eds) Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–324Google Scholar
  4. Blumberg D, Bach D, Weissel J, Gorokhovich Y, Small C, Balk D (2005) The 2004 sumatra tsunami event: contribution of SRTM data to the analysis of devastation. The shuttle radar topography mission—data validation and applications, workshop, June 14–16, 2005, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) (2004) Gridded Population of the World (GPW), Version 3. CIESIN, Columbia University, Palisades Available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw Google Scholar
  6. Cohen JE, Small C, Mellinger A, Gallup J, Sachs J (1997) Estimates of coastal populations. Science 278:1211Google Scholar
  7. Davies JL (1980) Geographical variation in coastal development. Longman, London, p 212Google Scholar
  8. Dawson RJ, Hall JW, Bates PD, Nicholls RJ (2005) Quantified analysis of the probability of flooding in the Thames Estuary under imaginable worst case sea-level rise scenarios. Int J Water Resour Dev 21(4):577–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deichmann U, Balk D, Yetman G (2001) Transforming population data for interdisciplinary usages: From census to grid. Accessed at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/plue/gpw/GPWdocumentation.pdf
  10. Dobson JE, Bright EA, Coleman PR, Durfee RC, Worley BA (2000) A global population database for estimating population at risk. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 66(7):849–857Google Scholar
  11. Environmental Systems Research Institute (2002) Digital chart of the world. ESRI, Redlands http://www.esri.com Google Scholar
  12. Fankhauser S (1994) Protection vs. retreat—the economic costs of sea-level rise. Environ Plann A 27:299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fankhauser S (1995) Valuing climate change-the economics of the greenhouse, 1st edn. EarthScan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ (2005) On climate change and economic growth. Resour Energy Econ 27:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbons S, Nicholls RJ (2006) Sea-level rise and island abandonment: an historical analog from chesapeake bay, USA. Glob Environ Change 16:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorokhovich Y, Voustianiouk A (2006) Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics. Remote Sens Environ 104:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory JM, Huybrechts P, Raper SCB (2004) Threatened loss of the Greenland ice-sheet. Nature 428:616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoozemans FMJ, Marchand M, Pennekamp HA (1993) A global vulnerability analysis: vulnerability assessment for population, coastal wetlands and rice production and a global scale , 2nd edn. Delft Hydraulics, DelftGoogle Scholar
  19. IMAGE Team (2002) The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios, RIVM CD-ROM Publication 481508018. RIVM, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  20. ISciences (2003) SRTM30 enhanced global map-elevation/slope/aspect. Accessed at http://www.terraviva.net
  21. Kasperson RE, Bohn MT, Goble R (2005) Assessing the risk of a future large sea-level rise. Climatic Change, in review. Hamburg University and Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Science, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  22. LandScan (2003) Global population database. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oakridge Accessed at http://www.ornl.gov/gist/ Google Scholar
  23. Leggett J, Pepper WJ, Swart RJ (1992) Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update. In: Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK (eds) Climate change 1992-the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Link PM, Tol RSJ (2004) Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the thermohaline circulation: an application of FUND. Portuguese Economic J 3:99–114Google Scholar
  25. Lonsdale KG, Downing TE, Nicholls RJ, Parker D, Vafeidis AT, Dawson R, Hall J (2008) Plausible Responses to the Threat of Rapid Sea-Level Rise in the Thames Estuary. Clim Change (this issue)Google Scholar
  26. Maxwell BA, Buddemeier RW (2003) Coastal typology development with heterogeneous data sets. Reg Environ Change 3(1–3):77–87Google Scholar
  27. McFadden L, Spencer T, Nicholls RJ (2007) Broad-scale modelling of coastal wetlands: what is required? Hydrobiolgica 577:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McLean R, Tsyban A, Burkett V, Codignotto JO, Forbes DL, Mimura N, Beamish RJ, Ittekkot V (2001) Coastal zone and marine ecosystems. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 341–379Google Scholar
  29. Mercer JH (1978) West antarctic ice sheet and CO2 greenhouse effect: a threat of disaster. Nature 271:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson A, Balk D (2003) Global population mapping. In Proceedings of global livestock and poverty mapping meeting, 6–7 February 2003. FAO Headquarters, Rome, pp 45–53Google Scholar
  31. Nicholls RJ (1995) Coastal megacities and climate change. Geojournal 37/3:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicholls RJ (2004) Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change 14:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicholls RJ, Leatherman SP (1995a) The implications of accelerated sea-level rise for developing countries: a discussion. J Coast Res Special Issue 14:303–323Google Scholar
  34. Nicholls RJ, Leatherman SP (1995b) Global sea-level rise. In: Strzepek KM, Smith JB (eds) When climate changes: potential impact and implications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicholls RJ, Lowe JA (2004) Benefits of mitigation of climate change for coastal areas. Glob Environ Change 14:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicholls RJ, Tol RSJ (2006) Regional to global implications of sea-level rise: an analysis of the SRES scenarios. Philos Trans R Soc A 364(1841):1073–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nicholls RJ, Hanson SE, Lowe JA, Vaughan DA, Lenton Z, Ganopolski A, Tol RSJ, Vafeidis AT (2006) Metrics for assessing the economic benefits of climate change policies: sea-level rise. OECD, Paris downloadable at: http://www.oecd.org/env/cc/benefitsforum2006 Google Scholar
  38. Olsthoorn X, van der Werff P, Bouwer LM, Huitema D (2008) Neo-Atlantis: The Netherlands under a 5-m sea level rise. Clim Change (this issue) doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9423-z
  39. Oppenheimer M (1998) Global warming and the stability of the west antarctic ice sheet. Nature 393:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oppenheimer M, Alley RB (2004) The west antarctic ice sheet and long term climate policy. Clim Change 64:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Overpeck JT, Otto-Bliesner BL, Miller GH, Muhs DR, Alley RB, Kiehl JT (2006) Palaeoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311:1747–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poumadère M, Mays C, Pfeifle G, Vafeidis AT (2008) Worst Case Scenario as Stakeholder Decision Support: A 5-6 Meter Sea Level Rise in the Rhone Delta, France. Clim Change (this issue)Google Scholar
  43. Rijkswaterstaat DGW (1986) Zeespiegelrijzing. Rijkswaterstaat, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodriguez E, Morris CS, Belz JE, Chapin EC, Martin JM, Daffer W, Hensley S (2005) An assessment of the SRTM topographic products, technical report JPL D-31639. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, p 143Google Scholar
  45. Schneider SH, Chen RS (1980) Carbon dioxide flooding: physical factors and climatic impact. Annu Rev Energy 5:107–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Small C, Nicholls RJ (2003) A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J Coast Res 19(3):584–599Google Scholar
  47. Smith JB, Schellnhuber H-J, Mirza MMQ (2001) Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziana OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 911–967Google Scholar
  48. Titus JG, Park RA, Leatherman SP, Weggel JR, Greene MS, Mausel PW, Brown S, Gaunt C, Trehan M, Yohe G (1991) Greenhouse effect and sea-level rise: the cost of holding back the sea. Coast Manage 19:171–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tol RSJ (1995) The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations. Environ Resour Econ 5:353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tol RSJ (2002a) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change-part 1: benchmark estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21:47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tol RSJ (2002b) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change-part II: dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21:135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tol RSJ (2007) The double trade-off between adaptation and mitigation for sea-level rise: an application of FUND. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob ChangGoogle Scholar
  53. Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2006) The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: an empirical test, research unit sustainability and global change FNU-97. Hamburg University and Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Science, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  54. Tol RSJ, Bohn M, Downing TE, Guillerminet ML, Hizsnyik E, Kasperson R, Lonsdale K, Mays C, Nicholls RJ, Olsthoorn AA, Pfeifle G, Poumadere M, Toth FL, Vafeidis AT, Van der Werff PE, Yetkiner IH (2006) Adaptation to five metres of sea-level rise. J Risk Res 9:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Townend IH (1994) Variation in design conditions in response to sea-level rise. Proc Ins Civ Eng, Marit Energy 106(Sept):205–213Google Scholar
  56. Townend I, Burgess K (2004) Methodology for assessing the impact of climate change upon coastal defence structures. In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE, New York, pp 3953–3966Google Scholar
  57. Turner RK, Doktor P, Adger NW (1995) Assessing the costs of sea-level rise. Environ Plann A 27:1777–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vaughan DG, Spouge JR (2002) Risk estimation of collapse of the West Antarctic Sheet. Clim Change 52:65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yohe GW, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving towards a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 12(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yohe GW, Neumann JE, Ameden H (1995) Assessing the economic cost of greenhouse-induced sea-level rise: methods and applications in support of a national survey. J Environ Econ Manage 29:S–78-S-97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yohe GW, Neumann JE, Marshall P, Ameden H (1996) The economics costs of sea-level rise on US coastal properties. Clim Change 32:387–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Nicholls
    • 1
  • Richard S. J. Tol
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Athanasios T. Vafeidis
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and the Environment and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change ResearchUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Economic and Social Research InstituteDublinIreland
  3. 3.Institute for Environmental StudiesVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Engineering and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  5. 5.Department of GeographyUniversity of the Aegean, University HillMytileneGreece

Personalised recommendations