Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate
- 398 Downloads
In addition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, actions to achieve a sustainable coexistence with wildfire need to be taken now. In this paper we suggest several important policy, planning, and management changes that should be made, regardless of the many uncertainties in predicting future fire regimes. Similar to how other natural hazards are addressed, a risk-based framework for fire-related decisions is crucial. Reintroduction of fire to fire-prone ecosystems, careful use of fire surrogates, and creation of new and flexible policies will be needed for successful ecosystem management. Growing incompatibilities between urban development and wildfire also require a serious reevaluation of urban planning and building in fire-prone locations to reach a sustainable coexistence with fire. Our future cities and communities must be less susceptible to wildfire damage, and the ecosystems upon which we depend must be made more resilient to further disruptions in fire regimes.
KeywordsFire Regime Fire Management Wildland Fire Fire Weather Fire Policy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Booth DB, Jackson R (1997) Urbanization of aquatic systems – degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 22:1–20Google Scholar
- Davis FW, Michaelsen J (1995) Sensitivity of fire regime in chaparral ecosystems to global climate change. In: Moreno JM, Oechel WC (eds) Global change and mediterranean-type ecosystems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Field CB, Daily GC, Davis FW, Gaines S, Matson PA, Melack J, Miller NL (1999) Confronting climate change in California: ecological impacts on the golden state. Cambridge, MA, Union of Concerned ScientistsGoogle Scholar
- Finney MA (2001) Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. For Sci 47:219–228Google Scholar
- Hickman JC (1993) The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Husari S, Nichols T, Sugihara NG, Stephens SL (2006) Fuel management. In: Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Fites-Kaufman J, Shaffer KE, Thode AE (eds) Fire in California ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley CA.Google Scholar
- Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Moritz MA (2004) Lessons from the October 2003 wildfires in southern California. J For 102:26–31Google Scholar
- Miller C, Landres PB, Alaback PB (2000) Evaluating risks and benefits of wildland fire at landscape scales. In: Neuenschwander LF, Ryan KC, Gollberg GE, Greer JD (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop: “Crossing the Millennium: Integrating Spatial Technologies and Ecological Principles for a New Age in Fire Management,” Boise, Idaho, June 15–17, 1999, University of Idaho, pp 78–87Google Scholar
- Stephens SL, Fulé PZ (2005) Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: possible reference sites for management. J For 103:532–542Google Scholar
- Stephens SL, Sugihara NG (2006) Fire management and policy since European settlement. In: Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, FitesKaufman J, Shaffer KE, Thode AE (eds) Fire in California Ecosystems. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Wotton BM, Flannigan MD (1993) Length of fire season in a changing climate. For Chron 69:187–192Google Scholar