Climatic Change

, Volume 85, Issue 3–4, pp 251–258 | Cite as

The properties of organisms are not tunable parameters selected because they create maximum entropy production on the biosphere scale: A by-product framework in response to Kleidon

  • Tyler Volk


Axel Kleidon (Clim Change 66:271–319, 2004) proposed that the organisms that constitute Earth’s biota have free parameters that can be selected to create states of maximum entropy production (MEP) on various scales, from the biota to the planetary radiation balance of the Earth system. I show that Kleidon’s concept, here called the biotic-MEP hypothesis, is fundamentally mistaken. A thought experiment with a life form that would be selected against even though it would generate a higher degree of entropy demonstrates my case: A hypothetical tree that puts forth a non-productive but high-entropy producing black carpet of tissue clearly separates out entropy production from other biological processes and shows that entropy production is not a functional adaptation and therefore it cannot be selected for. A real world example comes from dimethyl sulfide-emitting plankton, which, by increasing cloud albedo, do not raise but rather lower the entropy flux of the Earth system. I provide a number of other examples of biotic processes that individually either decrease or increase the environmental entropy production. It is argued that biological effects on environmental entropy production can be expected to include both positive and negative examples, because these effects are merely by-products of the actual processes that are selected for by evolution. Given my framework of entropy production as a by-product of the true processes that are being selected for, the concept of MEP on environmental scales has no great relevance for discussions of biological evolution or the time history of the effects of life on the global system.


Entropy Production Dimethyl Sulfide Biotic Process Planetary Albedo Maximum Entropy Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berner RA (1994) Geocarb II: A revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time. Am J Sci 294:56–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caldeira K (1989) Evolutionary pressures on planktonic production of atmospheric sulfur. Nature 337:732–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charlson RJ, Lovelock JE, Andreae MO, Warren SG (1987) Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulfur, cloud albedo, and climate. Nature 274:246–248Google Scholar
  4. Kirschner JW (2002) The Gaia hypothesis, fact, theory, and wishful thinking. Clim Change 52:391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kleidon, A (2004) Beyond Gaia: thermodynamics of life and Earth system functioning. Clim Change 66:271–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robinson JM (1990) Lignin, land plants, and fungi: biological evolution affecting Phanerozoic oxygen balance. Geology 15:607–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schwartzman DW, Volk T (1989) Biotic enhancement of weathering and the habitability of Earth. Nature 340:457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schwartzman DW, Volk T (1991) Biotic enhancement of weathering and surface temperatures on Earth since the origin of life. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 90:357–371Google Scholar
  9. Volk T (1989) Sensitivity of climate and atmospheric CO2 to deep-ocean and shallow-ocean carbonate burial. Nature 337:637–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Volk T (1998) Gaia’s body: toward a physiology of Earth. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Volk T (2002) Towards a future for Gaia theory. Clim Change 52:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Volk T (2003) Natural selection, Gaia, and inadvertent by-products; a reply to Lenton and Wilkinson’s response. Clim Change 58:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Watson AJ, Liss PS (1998) Marine biological controls on climate via the carbon and sulphur geochemical cycles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations