Climatic Change

, Volume 76, Issue 1–2, pp 91–119 | Cite as

Risk-Based Reanalysis of the Effects of Climate Change on U.S. Cold-water Habitat

  • Benjamin L. Preston


A probabilistic risk assessment was conducted for the effects of future climate change on U.S. cold-water habitat. Damage functions for the loss of current cold-water fish habitat in the United States and the Rocky Mountain region were integrated with probability distributions for U.S. June/July/August (JJA) temperature change using Monte Carlo techniques. Damage functions indicated temperature thresholds for incipient losses (≥5%) of cold-water habitat in the United States and the Rocky Mountains of 0.6 and 0.4 C, respectively. Median impacts associated with different temperature distributions suggested habitat loss in 2025, 2050, and 2100 of approximately 10, 20, and 30%, respectively, for the United States and 20, 35, and 50%, respectively, in the Rocky Mountains. However, 2100 losses in excess of 60% and 90% were possible for the United States and the Rocky Mountains, respectively, albeit at low probabilities. The implementation of constraints on greenhouse gas emissions conforming to the WRE750/550/350 stabilization scenarios had little effect on reducing habitat loss out to 2050, but median effects in 2100 were reduced by up to 20, 30, and 60%, respectively. Increased focus on probabilistic risk assessment may be a profitable mechanism for enhancing understanding and communication of climate change impacts and, subsequently, risk management.


Emission Scenario Climate Change Impact Habitat Loss Climate Sensitivity Damage Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahn, S., de Steiguer, J. E., Palmquist, R. B., and Holmes, T. P.: 2000, ‘Economic analysis of the potential impact of climate change on recreational trout fishing in the southern appalachian mountains: An application of a nested multinominal logit model’, Clim. Change 45, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M. R. and Stainforth, D. A.: 2002, ‘Toward objective probabilistic climate forecasting’, Science 419, 229.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, P.: 2002, ‘Decision-making when science is ambiguous’, Science 295, 1839.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnell, N. W., Cannell, M. G. R., Hulme, M., Kovats, R. S., Mitchell, J. F. B., Nicholls, R. J., Parry, M. L., Livermore, M. T. J., and White, A.: 2002, ‘The consequences of CO2 stabilization for the impacts of climate change’, Climatic Change 53, 413–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai, A., Wigley, T. M. L., Meehl, G. A., and Washington, W. M.: 2001, ‘Effects of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 on global climate in the next two centuries’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4511–4514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dessai, S. and Hulme, M.: 2003, Does Climate Policy Need Probabilities? Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 34, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Eaton, J. G. and Scheller, R. M.: 1996, ‘Effects of climate warming on fish thermal habitat in streams of the United States’, Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1109–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emans, H. J. B., Plassche, E. J. V. D., Canton, J. H., Okkerman, P. C., and Sparenburg, P. M.: 1993, ‘Validation of some extrapolation methods used for effect assessment’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12, 2139–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Etterson, J. R. and Shaw, R. G.: 2001, ‘Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming,’ Science 294, 151–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R., and Webster, M. D.: 2002, ‘Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations’, Science 295, 113–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: 2002, ‘Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “Reliability ensemble averaging” (REA) method’, J Climate 15, 1141–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: 2003, ‘Probability of regional climate change based on the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL017130.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, J. E.: 2005, ‘A slippery slope: How Much global warming constitutes “Dangerous anthropogenic interference’, Clim. Change 68, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen, J. E., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., Imhoff, M., Lawrence, W., Easterling, D., Peterson, T., and Karl, T.: 2001, ‘A closer look at united states and global surface temperature change’, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 23947–23963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC: 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Special Report for Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, N. Nakicenovic and Swart, R. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 570 pp.Google Scholar
  16. IPCC: 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 881 pp.Google Scholar
  17. IPCC: 2002, ‘Climate change and biodiversity’, in H. Gitay, A. Suárez, R. T. Watson, and D. J. Dokken (eds.), Technical Paper V, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, 86 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, R. N.: 2000, ‘Managing uncertainty in climate change projections—issues for impact assessment’, Clim. Change 45, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, R. N.: 2001, ‘An Environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments’, Nat. Hazards 23, 197–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, R. N.: 2004, “Incorporating agency into climate change risk assessments’, Clim. Change 67, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, R. N. and Mearns, L. O.: 2005, “Assessing Future Climate Risks’, in B. Lim, E. Spanger-Siegfried, I. Burton, E. L. Malone, and S. Huq (eds.), Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures, United Nations Development Programme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 119–143.Google Scholar
  22. Keleher, C. J. and Rahel, F. J.: 1996, ‘Thermal limits to salmonid distributions in the rocky mountain region and potential habitat loss due to global warming: A geographic information system (GIS) Approach’, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 125, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G.-K.: 2002, ‘Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles’, Nature 416, 719-723.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolar, C. S. and Lodge, D. M.: 2002, ‘Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America’, Science 298, 1233–1236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Magnuson, J. J., Meisner, J. D., and Hill, D. K.: 1990, ‘Potential changes in the thermal habitat of great lakes fish after global climate warming’, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 119, 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mastrandrea, M. D. and Schneider, S. H.: 2004, ‘Probabilistic integrated assessment of “dangerous” climate change’, Science 304, 571–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Matthews, W. J. and Zimmerman, E. G.: 1990, ‘Potential effects of global warming on native fishes of the southern great plains and the Southwest’, Fisheries 15, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meisner, J. D.: 1990, ‘effect of climate warming on the southern margins of the native range of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis’, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 47, 1065–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meisner, J. D., Goodier, J. L., Regier, H. A., Shutter, B. J., and Christie, W. J.: 1987, ‘An assessment of the effects of climate warming on great lakes basin fishes’, J. Great Lakes Res. 13, 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, J. L., Sale, M. J., Mulholland, P. J., and Poff, N. L.: 1999, ‘Impacts of climate change on aquatic ecosystem functioning and health’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35, 1373–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohseni, O., Stefan, H. G., and Eaton, J. G.: 2003, ‘Global warming and potential changes in fish habitat in U.S. streams’, Clim. Change 59, 289–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohseni, O., Stefan, H. G., and Erikson, T. R.: 1998, ‘A nonlinear regression model for weekly stream temperatures’, Water Res. 34, 2685–2692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morgan, M. G. and Keith, D. W.: 1995, ‘Subjective judgments by climate experts’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 468A-476A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moss, R. H.: 1995, ‘Avoiding “Dangerous” interference in the climate system: The role of values, science and policy’, Global Environ. Chang. 5, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J., Collins, M., and Stainforth, D. A.: 2004, ‘Quantification of modeling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations’, Nature 430, 768–772.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. NAST: 2000, Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change, National Assessment Synthesis Team, U.S. Global Change Research Program, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 154 pp.Google Scholar
  37. New, M., Hulme, M., and Jones, P. D.: 1999, ‘Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology’, J Clim. 12, 829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Novacek, M. J. and Cleland, E. E.: 2001, ‘The current biodiversity extinction event: Scenarios for mitigation and recovery’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5466–5470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Okkerman, P. C., Plassche, E. J. V. D., Emans, H. J. B., and Canton, J. H.: 1993, ‘Validation of some extrapolation methods with toxicity data derived from multiple species experiments’, Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 25, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O'Neal, K.: 2002. Effects of Global Warming on Trout and Salmon in U.S. Streams, Defenders of Wildlife and National Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  41. O'Neill, B. C. and Oppenheimer, M.: 2002, ‘Dangerous climate impacts and the kyoto protocol’, Science 296, 1971–1972.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Parry, M. L., Carter, T. R., and Hulme, M.: 1996, ‘What is dangerous climate change?’ Global Environ. Change 6, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pittock, A. B., Jones, R. N, and Mitchell, C. D.: 2001, ‘Probabilities will help us plan for climate change,’ Nature 413, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poff, N. L., Brinson, M. M., Day, J. W. Jr.: 2002, Aquatic Ecosystems and Global Climate Change: Potential Impacts on Inland Freshwater and Coastal Wetland Ecosystems in the United States. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  45. Rahel, F. J., Keleher, C. J., and Anderson, J. L.: 1996, ‘Potential habitat loss and population fragmentation for cold water fish in the North Platte river drainage of the Rocky Mountains: Response to climate warming’, Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 1116–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reilly, J., Stone, P. H., Forest, C. E., Webster, M. D. Jacoby, H. D., and Prinn, R. G.: 2001, ‘Uncertainty and climate change assessments’, Science 293, 430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Risbey, J. S.: 2004, ‘Agency and the assignment of probabilities to greenhouse emissions scenarios’, Clim. Change 67, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S. III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M., and Wall, D. H.: 2000, ‘Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100’, Science 287, 1770–1774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Santer, B. D., Wigley, T. M. L., Schlesinger, M. E., and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1990, Developing Climate Scenarios from Equilibrium GCM Results, Max-Planck-Institute für Meterologie, Report No. 47, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  50. Schneider, S. H.: 2001, ‘What is “dangerous” climate change?’ Nature 411, 17–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stainforth, D. A., Alna, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame, D. J., Kettleborough, J. A., Knight, S., Martin, A., Murphy, J. M., Plani, C., Sexton, D., Smith, L. A., Spicer, R. A., Thorpe, A. J., and Allen, A. R.: 2005, ‘Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases’, Nature 433, 403–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Stefan, H. G. and Preud'homme, E. B. 1993, ‘Stream temperature estimation from air temperature’, Water Resour. Bull. 29, 1–19.Google Scholar
  53. Stillman, J. H.: 2003, ‘Acclimation capacity underlies susceptibility to climate change,’ Science 301, 65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Stott, P. A. and Kettleborough, J. A., 2002, ‘Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise’, Nature 416, 723–726.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Swart, R., Mitchell, J., Morita, T., and Raper, S.: 2002, ‘Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment’, Global Environ. Chang. 12, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swart, R. J. and Vellinga, P.: 1994, ‘The “ultimate objective” of the framework convention on climate change requires a new approach in climate change research’, Clim. Change 26, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tebaldi, C., Mearns, L. O., Nychka, D., and Smith, R. L.: 2004, ‘Regional probabilities of precipitation change: a bayesian analysis of multimodel simulations’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, doi:10.1029/2004GL021276.Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., Erasmus, B. R. N., de Siqueira, M. F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., Hughes, L., Huntley, B., van Jaarsveld, A. S., Midgley, G. F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M. A., Peterson, A. T., Phillips, O. L., and Williams, S. E.: 2004, ‘Extinction risk from climate change’, Nature 427, 154–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Titus, J. G. and Narayanan, V.: 1995, The Probability of Sea Level Rise, EPA Report 230-R-95-008, p. 186.Google Scholar
  60. Titus, J. G. and Narayanan, V.: 1996, ‘The risk of sea level rise’, Clim. Change 33, 151–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Toth, F. L., Cramer, W., and Hizsnyik, E.: 2000, ‘Climate impact response functions: An introduction’, Clim. Change 46, 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UNFCCC: 1992, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, New York, NY, 33 pp.Google Scholar
  63. U. S. DOI: 1997, 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  64. U.S. EPA: 1995, Ecological Impacts from Climate Change: An Economic Analysis of Freshwater Recreational Fishing, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation, EPA 220-R-004, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  65. Visser, H., Folkert, R. J. M., Hoekstra, J., and de Wolff, J. J.: 2000, ‘Identifying key sources of uncertainty in climate change projections’, Clim. Change 45, 421–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Webster, M. D., Babiker, M., Mayer, M., Reilly, J. M., Harnisch, J., Hyman, R., Sarofim, M. C., and Wang, C.: 2002, ‘Uncertainty in emissions projections for climate models’, Atmos. Environ. 36, 3659–3670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Webster, M., Forest, C., Reilly, J., Babiker, M., Kicklighter, D., Mayer, M., Prinn, R., Sarofim, M., Sokolov, A., Stone, P., and Wang, C.: 2003, ‘Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response’, Clim. Change 61, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wigley, T. M. L.: 1999, The Science of Climate Change: Global and U.S. Perspectives, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  69. Wigley, T. M. L.: 2005, ‘The climate change commitment’, Science 307, 1766–1769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B.: 2001, ‘Interpretations of high projections for global-mean warming’, Science 293, 451–454.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R., and Edmonds, J. A.: 1996, ‘Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations’, Nature 379, 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Willows, R. and Connell, R.: 2003: Climate Adaptation: Risk, Uncertainty and Decision-Making, UK Climate Impacts Programme, Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, Oxford, UK, 154 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pew Center on Global Climate ChangeArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.CSIRO Atmospheric ResearchAspendaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations