Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 70, Issue 1–2, pp 273–282 | Cite as

Tomorrow’s Forests: Adapting to A Changing Climate

  • Don C. Maciver
  • Elaine Wheaton
Article

Abstract

Today’s forests are largely viewed as a natural asset, growing in a climate envelope, which favors natural regeneration of species that have adapted and survived the variability’s of past climates. However, human-induced climate change, variability and extremes are no longer a theoretical concept. It is a real issue affecting all biological systems. Atmospheric scientists, using global climate models, have developed scenarios of the future climate that far exceed the traditional climate envelope and their associated forest management practices. Not all forests are alike, nor do they share the same adaptive life cycles, feedbacks and threats. Much of tomorrow’s forests will become farmed forests, managed in a pro-active, designed and adaptive envelope, to sustain multiple products, values and services. Given the life cycle of most forest species, forest management systems will need to radically adjust their limits of knowledge and adaptive strategies to initiate, enhance and plan forests in relative harmony with the future climate. Protected Areas (IUCN), Global Biosphere Reserves (UNESCO) and Smithsonian Institution sites provide an effective community-based platform to monitor changes in forest species, ecosystems and biodiversity under changing climatic conditions.

Keywords

Forest Management Future Climate Forest Species Global Climate Model Biosphere Reserve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carter, T., Parry, M., Nishioka, S. and Harasawa, H., and Contributing Authors.: 1996, Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations, in Watson et al., 1996 op. cit.Google Scholar
  2. Carter, T., Parry, M., Harasawa, H., and Nishioka, N.: 1994, IPCC Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations, University College, London.Google Scholar
  3. Charles, C.: 1998, ‘The ends of an era’, Nature 394, 422–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dallmeier, F.: 1992, Long-Term Monitoring of Biological Diversity in Tropical Forest Areas, MAB Digest, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  5. Ebbesmeyer, C. C. et al.: 1990, 1976, ‘Step in Pacific climate: Forty environmental changes between 1968–1975 and 1977—1984’, in Proceedings of the 7th Annual Pacific Climate Workshop, California Department of Water Resources Technical Report, Vol. 26, 115–126.Google Scholar
  6. Gedalof, Z. and Smith, D.:1999, ‘Interdecadal Climate Variability in the Northeast pacific Interpreted from Tree-Rings’, in MacIver (ed.), Adaptation Lessons based on Changing Trends and Extremes in Climate and Biodiversity, Environment Canada, Toronto, pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, S. J.: 1977, Ever Since Darwin, Norton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H., and Walters, C. J.: 1994, ‘The Structure and Dynamics of the Everglades System: Guidelines for Ecosystem Restoration’, in S. Davis and J. Ogden (eds.), Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration, St. Lucie Press, Dalray Beach, Florida, pp. 741–757.Google Scholar
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 1997, ‘IPCC Adaptation Experts’, Meeting Report, 20–22 March 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. MacIver, D. C.: 1998, ‘Atmospheric change and biodiversity’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 49, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacIver, D. C. and Auld, H.: 2000, ‘The changing atmosphere, forest biodiversity and productivity in Ontario, Canada’, in Proceedings of the 14th AMS Conference on Biometeorology and Aerobiology, Davis, California.Google Scholar
  12. Smit, B. Burton, I., and Klein, R. J. T.: 1999, ‘The Science of Adaptation: A Framework for Assessment’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Global Change 4.Google Scholar
  13. Smithers, J. and Smit, B.: 1997, ‘Human adaptation to climatic variability and change’, Global Environ. Change 7(2), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stankey, G. H.: 2001, Too Early to Tell, or Too Late to Rescue? Adaptive management under Scrutiny, U.S. Forest Service, PNW, Science Findings, April 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Watson, R., Zinyowera, M. and Moss, R. (eds.): 1998, ‘The regional impacts of climate change’, A Special Report of IPCC Working Group II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, +517 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C. and Moss, R. H. (eds.): 1996, ‘Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses’, Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. +878 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Wheaton, E., and MacIver, D. C.: 1999, ‘A framework and key questions for adapting to climate variability and change’, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Global Change 4, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. UNESCO (MAB): 2002, Retreived from Biosphere Reserves at www.unesco.org.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meteorological Service of CanadaDownsviewCanada
  2. 2.Saskatchewan Research CouncilSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations