Comparing the Multicomponent Coping Power Program to Individualized Parent–Child Treatment for Improving the Parenting Efficacy and Satisfaction of Parents of Children with Conduct Problems
This study compared the multicomponent Coping Power (group) program to individualized parent–child treatment with respect to changing the parenting efficacy and satisfaction of parents of children with conduct problems. One hundred fourteen parents of 9–12-year-old children with conduct problems were randomized to Coping Power or individualized treatment at an urban children’s mental health clinic. Parents reported their pre- and post-treatment parenting efficacy and parenting satisfaction (Parent Sense of Competence Scale). Mixed effect models revealed that parenting efficacy and satisfaction significantly increased from pre- to post-treatment, and there was no evidence that this effect is different between Coping Power and individualized treatment, even after controlling for initial severity of child symptomatology. Findings support the effectiveness of Coping Power as an intervention for parenting efficacy and satisfaction among parents of children aged 9–12 years with conduct problems.
KeywordsCoping power Parent training Conduct disorder Parenting efficacy Parenting satisfaction
We would like to thank the families and clinicians who participated. This research was funded in part by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation, Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program, and the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine Dean’s Fund New Staff Grant awarded to Brendan F. Andrade.
- 2.Lochman JE, Wells K (1996) A social-cognitive intervention with aggressive children: Prevention effects and contextual implementation issues. In: Peters RD, McMahon RJ (eds) Prevention and early intervention: childhood disorders, substance use, and delinquency (111–143). Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fonagy P, Cottrell D, Phillips J, Bevington D, Glaser D, Allison E (2014) What works for whom? A critical review of treatments for children and adolescents. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Jackson AP, Huang CC (2000) Parenting stress and behavior among single mothers of preschoolers: the mediating role of self-efficacy. J Soc Serv Res 26:29–42Google Scholar
- 20.Webster-Stratton C (2001) The incredible years: parents and children videotape series: a parenting course (BASIC). Incredible Years, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- 21.Greene RW (1998) The explosive child: a new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated, “chronically inflexible” children. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Chorpita BF, Weisz JR (2009) MATCH-ADTC: modular approach to therapy for children with anxiety, depression, trauma, or conduct problems. PracticeWise, Satellite BeachGoogle Scholar
- 25.Wymbs F, Cunningham C, Chen Y, Rimas H, Deal K, Waschbusch D, Pelham W (2016) Examining parents’ preferences for group versus individual parent training programs versus a minimal information alternative for children with ADHD symptoms using a discrete choice conjoint experiment. J Clin Child Adolesc 45:614–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Parent-training/education programmes in the management of children with conduct disorders. Gaskell, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 29.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) Antisocial personality disorder: treatment, management, and prevention. British Psychological Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 31.Andrade BF, Browne DT, Wade M, Tannock R (in preparation) The clinic-adapted coping power program and individualized child and family treatment: a randomized and controlled effectiveness trialGoogle Scholar
- 34.Cheng J, Edwards LJ, Maldonado-Molina MM, Komro KA, Muller KE (2010) Real longitudinal data analysis for real people: building a good enough mixed model. Stat Med 20:504–520Google Scholar
- 35.Brown H, Prescott R (2014) Applied mixed model in medicine. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar