Maternal Sensitivity and Internalizing Problems: Evidence from Two Longitudinal Studies in Early Childhood
The goal of this study is to clarify the relation between maternal sensitivity and internalizing problems during the preschool period. For this purpose, a longitudinal, bidirectional model was tested in two large prospective, population-based cohorts, the Generation R Study and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD), including over 1,800 mother–child dyads in total. Maternal sensitivity was repeatedly observed in mother–child interaction tasks and information on child internalizing problems was obtained from maternal reports. Modest but consistent associations between maternal sensitivity and internalizing problems were found in both cohorts, confirming the importance of sensitive parenting for positive development in the preschool years. Pathways from maternal sensitivity to child internalizing problems were consistently observed but child-to-mother pathways were only found in the NICHD SECCYD sample.
KeywordsMaternal sensitivity Internalizing problems Longitudinal Bidirectional
The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Center in close collaboration with the Faculty of Social Sciences of the Erasmus University, the Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation and the Stichting Trombosedienst & Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond (STAR). We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of general practitioners, hospitals, midwives and pharmacies in Rotterdam. The first phase of the Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (Zon Mw). The present study was supported by additional grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant no. 452-04-306 and grant no. 453-09-003 (VIDI and VICI) to MJBK; grant no 017.106.370 (NWO ZonMw VIDI) to HT, and NWO SPINOZA prize to MHvIJ).
Conflict of interest
Dr Frank C. Verhulst publishes the Dutch versions of the ASEBA from which he receives remuneration.
- 9.Bandura A (1971) Psychological modeling: conflicting theories. Aldine-Altherton, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 19.Haltigan JD, Roisman GI, Fraley RC (2012) The predictive significance of early caregiving experiences for symptoms of psychopathology through midadolescence: enduring or transient effects? Dev Psychopathol. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000260
- 26.National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (2005) Nonmaternal care and family factors in early development: an overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. In: The NICHD Early Care Research Network (ed) Child care and child development: results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Guilford Press, New York, pp 3–36Google Scholar
- 27.Luijk PCM, Roisman GI, Haltigan JD, Tiemeier H, Booth-LaForce C, Van IJzendoorn MH et al (2011) Dopaminergic, serotonergic, and oxytonergic candidate genes associated with infant attachment security and disorganization? In search of main and interaction effects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:1295–1307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2000) Manual for the ASEBA preschool form & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth, and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 30.Achenbach TM (1992) Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 31.Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 32.Egeland B, Erickson MF, Clemenhagen-Moon J, Hiester MK, Korfmacher J (1990) 24 months tools coding manual. Project STEEP-revised 1990 from mother-child project scales. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
- 34.Erickson MF, Sroufe LA, Egeland B (1985) The relationship between quality of attachment and behavior problems in preschool in a high-risk sample. In: Bretherton I, Waters E (eds) Growing point of attachment: theory and research. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 50:147–166Google Scholar
- 35.Ainsworth MS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ainsworth MS, Bell SM, Stayton DJ (1974) Infant-mother attachment and social development: ‘socialization’ as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In: Richards MPM (ed) The integration of a child into a social world. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 99–135Google Scholar
- 38.Lucassen N, Lambregtse-Van den Berg MP, Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Verhulst FC, Hofman A et al History of psychopathology and family functioning during pregnancy as predictors of observed parental sensitivity (submitted)Google Scholar
- 41.Bentler PM (1995) EQS structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software Inc, Encino, CAGoogle Scholar
- 44.Byrne BM (2006) Structural equation modeling with EQS, basic concepts, applications and programming, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- 45.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 54.Tharner A, Luijk PCM, Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A et al (2012) Maternal lifetime history of depression and depressive symptoms in the prenatal and early postnatal period do not predict infant-mother attachment quality in a large, population-based Dutch cohort study. Attach Hum Dev 14:63–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar