The Role of Caregiver Contingent Responsiveness in Promoting Compliance in Young Children
- 465 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to examine relations between parents’ contingent responding and the behavior of their young children, in the context of other relevant parenting behaviors. Parents were observed interacting with their 3–6 year-old children during two laboratory tasks. Parent responses to child bids were classified into four mutually exclusive categories: contingent responses, non-contingent non-negative responses, negative responses, and no response. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to examine relations between contingent responsiveness and child compliance, after accounting for the quality of parent directives and parent negativity. Contingent responsiveness was uniquely associated with greater child compliance for mothers during both tasks and for fathers during one task. An interaction effect was found, indicating that fathers’ responsiveness during the second task was associated with greater child compliance in older, but not younger, children. Implications for clinical practice and future research directions are discussed.
KeywordsParenting Responsiveness Child compliance Early childhood
This research was supported in part by grant #1R01HD042621 to Ronald Prinz from the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development.
- 8.Ainsworth MDS, Bell SM, Stayton DJ (1974) Infant–mother attachment and social development: “socialization” as a product of reciprocal responsiveness signals. In: Richards MPM (ed) The integration of a child into a social world. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 99–135Google Scholar
- 10.Patterson GR (1982) Coercive family process. Castalia, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
- 16.Vizziello GMF, Ferrero C, Musicco M (2000) Parent–child synchrony of interaction. In: Crittenden PM, Claussen AH (eds) The organization of attachment relationships: maturation, culture, and context. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 38–60Google Scholar
- 25.Garcia-Sellers MJ, Church K (2000) Avoidance, frustration, and hostility during toddlers’ interaction with their mothers and fathers. Infant Toddler Interv 10:259–274Google Scholar
- 26.Ryan RM, Martin A, Brooks-Gunn J (2006) Is one good parent good enough? Patterns of mother and father parenting and child cognitive outcomes at 24 and 36 months. Parent Sci Pract 6:211–228Google Scholar
- 27.Prinz RJ, Cuthbert J, Lambrinos JO (2005) The parenting observational code. Technical manual, USC Parenting & Family Research CenterGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
- 30.Crittenden PM (1988) Relationships at risk. In: Belsky J, Nezworski T (eds) Clinical implications of attachment. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 136–174Google Scholar
- 31.Ainsworth MDS, Blehar M, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the Strange Situation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
- 32.Maccoby, EE, Martin JA (1983) Socialization in the context of the family: parent-child interaction. In: Hetherington EM (ed), Mussen PH (series ed) Handbook of child psychology: volume 4. Socialization, personality, and social development. Wiley, New York, pp 1–101Google Scholar