Chromosome Research

, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 833–840 | Cite as

Abortive meiosis in the oogenesis of parthenogenetic Daphnia pulex

  • Chizue Hiruta
  • Chizuko Nishida
  • Shin Tochinai


Most daphnid species adopt parthenogenesis and sexual reproduction differentially in response to varied environmental cues, resulting in the production of diploid progenies in both cases. Previous studies have reportedly suggested that daphnids produce their parthenogenetic eggs via apomixis; the nuclear division of mature oocytes should be an equational division similar to somatic mitosis. However, it seems premature to conclude that this has been unequivocally established in any daphnids. Therefore, the objective of our research was to precisely reveal the process and mechanism of parthenogenetic oogenesis and maintenance of diploidy in Daphnia pulex through histology, karyology, and immunohistochemistry. We found that, when a parthenogenetic egg entered the first meiosis, division was arrested in the early first anaphase. Then, two half-bivalents, which were dismembered from each bivalent, moved back to the equatorial plate and assembled to form a diploid equatorial plate. Finally, the sister chromatids were separated and moved to opposite poles in the same manner as the second meiotic division followed by the extrusion of one extremely small daughter cell (resembling a polar body). These results suggest that parthenogenetic D. pulex do not adopt typical apomixis. We hypothesize that D. pulex switches reproductive mode depending on whether the egg is fertilized or not.


Daphnia pulex Parthenogenesis Automixis Diploidy maintenance 



We are grateful to Dr. Masakane Yamashita and his team, Faculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, and Dr. Toru Miura and his team, Graduate School of Environmental Sciences, Hokkaido University, for helpful comments and suggestions on the study. We also thank the members of the Tochinai laboratory for their helpful advice and discussions. Chizue Hiruta was supported by a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research, financed by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, to Shin Tochinai.


  1. Bacci G, Cogneiti G, Vaccari AM (1961) Endomeiosis and sex determination in Daphnia pulex. Experientia 11:505–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaton MJ, Hebert PDN (1994) Variation in chromosome numbers of Daphnia (Crustacea, Cladocera). Hereditas 120:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hebert PDN (1978) The population biology of Daphnia (Cruatacea, Daphnidae). Biol Rev 53:387–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hendzel MJ, Wei Y, Mancini MA, Hooser AV, Ranalli T, Brinkley BR, Bazett-Jones DP, Allis CD (1997) Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106:348–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Itono M, Morishima K, Fujimoto T, Bando E, Yamaha E, Arai K (2006) Premeiotic endomitosis produces diploid eggs in the natural clone loach, Misgurnus anguilicautadus (Teleostei: Cobitidae). J Exp Zool 305A:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kühn A (1908) Die Entwicklung der Keimzellen in den parthenogenetischen Generationen der Cladoceren Daphnia pulex de Geer und Polyphemus pediculus de Geer. Arch Zellforsch 1:538–586Google Scholar
  7. Lachowska D, Rożek M, Holecová M (2008) New data on the cytology of parthenogenetic weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Genetica 134:235–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lumer H (1937) Growth and maturation in the parthenogenetic eggs of Daphnia magna Strauss. Cytologia 8:1–14Google Scholar
  9. Narbel M (1946) La cytologie de la parthénogenèse chez Apterona helix Sieb. (Lepid, Psychides). Rev Suisse Zool 53:625–681Google Scholar
  10. Narbel-Hofstetter M (1950) La cytologie de la parthénogenèse chez Solinobia sp. (lichenella L.?) (Lépidoptères, Psychides). Chromosoma 4:56–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Narbel-Hofstetter M (1963) Cytologie de la pseudogamie chez Luffia lapidella Goeze (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Chromosoma 13:623–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Narbel-Hofstetter M (1965) La variabilité cytologique dans la descendance des femelles de Luffia ferchaultella Steph. (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Chromosoma 16:345–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ojima Y (1954) Some cytological observations on parthenogenesis in Daphnia pulex (de Geer). J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser VI, Zool 12:230–241Google Scholar
  14. Ojima Y (1958) A cytological study on the development and maturation of the parthenogenetic and sexual eggs of Daphnia pulex (Crustacea, Cladocera). Kwansei Gakuin Univ Annu Stud 6:123–176Google Scholar
  15. Otto SP, Barton NH (2001) Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55:1921–1931PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Peck JR (1994) A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics 137:597–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rożek M, Lachowska D, Milada H, Kajtoch Ł (2009) Karyology of parthenogenetic weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae): do meiotic prophase stages occur? Micron 40:881–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sakai C, Konno F, Nakano O, Iwai T, Yokota T, Lee J, Nishida-Umehara C, Kuroiwa A, Matsuda Y, Yamashita M (2007) Chromosome elimination in the interspecific hybrid medaka between Oryzias latipes and O. hubbsi. Chromosome Res 15:697–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanderson AR (1952) Maturation and probable gynogenesis in the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L. Nature 172:110–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schurko AM, Logsdon JM Jr, Eads BD (2009) Meiosis genes in Daphnia pulex and the role of parthenogenesis in genome evolution. BMC Evol Biol 9:78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stefani R (1960) L’Artemia salina parthenogenetica a Cagliari. Riv Biol 52:463–490Google Scholar
  22. Sueoka N (1960) Mitotic replication of deoxyribonucleic acid in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Suomalainen E, Saura A, Lokki J (1987) Cytology and evolution in parthenogenesis. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. Wei Y, Mizzen CA, Cook RG, Gorovsky MA, Allis CD (1998) Phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 is correlated with chromosome condensation during mitosis and meiosis in Tetrahymena. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:7480–7484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Welch DM, Meselson M (2000) Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science 288:1211–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaffagnini F, Sabelli B (1972) Karyologic observations on the maturation of the summer and winter eggs of Daphnia pulex and Daphnia middendorffiana. Chromosoma 36(2):193–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chizue Hiruta
    • 1
    • 4
  • Chizuko Nishida
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shin Tochinai
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Natural History Sciences, Graduate School of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Natural History Sciences, Faculty of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Natural History Sciences, Graduate School of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations