Comparison of Trophic Factors Changes in the Hippocampal CA1 Region Between the Young and Adult Gerbil Induced by Transient Cerebral Ischemia
- 291 Downloads
In the present study, we investigated neuronal death/damage in the gerbil hippocampal CA1 region (CA1) and compared changes in some trophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in the CA1 between the adult and young gerbils after 5 min of transient cerebral ischemia. Most of pyramidal neurons (89 %) were damaged 4 days after ischemia–reperfusion (I–R) in the adult; however, in the young, about 59 % of pyramidal neurons were damaged 7 days after I–R. The immunoreactivity and levels of BDNF and VEGF, not GDNF, in the CA1 of the normal young were lower than those in the normal adult. Four days after I–R in the adult group, the immunoreactivity and levels of BDNF and VEGF were distinctively decreased, and the immunoreactivity and level of GDNF were increased. However, in the young group, all of their immunoreactivities and levels were much higher than those in the normal young group. From 7 days after I–R, all the immunoreactivities and levels were apparently decreased compared to those of the normal adult and young. In brief, we confirmed our recent finding: more delayed and less neuronal death occurred in the young following I–R, and we newly found that the immunoreactivities of trophic factors, such as BDNF, GDNF, and VEGF, in the stratum pyramidale of the CA1 in the young gerbil were much higher than those in the adult gerbil 4 days after transient cerebral ischemia.
KeywordsYoung animal Ischemia–reperfusion injury Pyramidal neurons More delayed neuronal death
The authors would like to thank Mr. Seung Uk Lee and Ms. Hyun Sook Kim for their technical help in this study. This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NO2011-0022812), and by a grant (2010K000823) from Brain Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, the Republic of Korea.
- Canistro D, Affatato AA, Soleti A, Mollace V, Muscoli C, Sculco F, Sacco I, Visalli V, Bonamassa B, Martano M, Iannone M, Sapone A, Paolini M (2010) The novel radical scavenger IAC is effective in preventing and protecting against post-ischemic brain damage in Mongolian gerbils. J Neurol Sci 290(1–2):90–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Finklestein SP (1996). The potential use of neurotrophic growth factors in the treatment of cerebral ischemia. Adv Neurol 71: 413–417; discussion 417–418Google Scholar
- Kitagawa H, Sasaki C, Sakai K, Mori A, Mitsumoto Y, Mori T, Fukuchi Y, Setoguchi Y, Abe K (1999) Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor prevents ischemic brain injury after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19(12):1336–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loskota WJ, Lomax P, Verity MA (1974). A stereotaxic atlas of the Mongolian gerbil brain (Meriones unguiculatus). Ann Arbor Science, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
- Nicole O, Ali C, Docagne F, Plawinski L, MacKenzie ET, Vivien D, Buisson A (2001) Neuroprotection mediated by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor: involvement of a reduction of NMDA-induced calcium influx by the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J Neurosci 21(9):3024–3033PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penton-Rol G, Marin-Prida J, Pardo-Andreu G, Martinez-Sanchez G, Acosta-Medina EF, Valdivia-Acosta A, Lagumersindez-Denis N, Rodriguez-Jimenez E, Llopiz-Arzuaga A, Lopez-Saura PA, Guillen-Nieto G, Penton-Arias E (2011) C-Phycocyanin is neuroprotective against global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in gerbils. Brain Res Bull 86(1–2):42–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Peng D, Zhu H, Wang X (2011). Experimental evidence of Ginkgo biloba extract EGB as a neuroprotective agent in ischemia stroke rats. Brain Res Bull 87:193–198Google Scholar