Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 2405–2417 | Cite as

A tunable optoelectronic nanofibrillated cellulose/CdS quantum dot film with improved transmittance and strength

  • Chang-yuan Yan
  • Zhi-qiang Fang
  • Ai-min Tang
  • Wang-yu Liu
  • Yuan Liu
  • Hai-zhen Shi
Original Paper
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) is an ideal building block in novel bio-based nanomaterials fabrication for various emerging applications. In this study, a biomass-based optoelectronic material of cadmium sulfide (CdS) quantum dots (QDs)-decorated TEMPO oxidized NFC was prepared by an in situ electrostatic adsorption method. The NFC/CdS QDs suspensions were then vacuum-filtrated to produce NFC/CdS QDs composite films. The morphology of the NFC/CdS QDs composites and their crystalline degree were studied by TEM and XRD measurement, respectively, and the mechanical and optoelectronic properties of the films were also investigated. The results indicated NFC/CdS QDs composite films exhibited excellent light transmittance and high elastic modulus while retaining prominent flexibility, superior optical and physical properties of pure NFC film. The light transmittance can be as high as 95% at 550 nm, and the elastic modulus reached up to 8.1 GPa. Homogeneous dispersion of CdS QDs with different size were obtained by varying carboxyl contents (molar ratio of COO:Cd2+ is 2:1), resulting in the tailored photoelectric effect of NFC/CdS QDs composite films. The photocurrent can be tuned from 0.71 to 1.98 μA. These results show great potential to extend the application of NFC in next-generation green flexible electronics, photocatalytic materials, and nanoscale photosensor.

Keywords

Nanofibrillated cellulose CdS quantum dots Carboxyl groups Light transmittance Elastic modulus Optoelectronic films 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering (2016PY01, 2015C09), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2016A030311052). Zhiqiang Fang would like to acknowledge acknowledged the funds from Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31700508), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2017A030310635), and Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou.

References

  1. Abitbol T, Rivkin A, Cao Y, Nevo Y, Abraham E, Shalom TB, Lapidot S, Shoseyov O (2016) Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 39:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam A, Leoni G, Wentworth CC, Kwal JM, Wu H, Ardita CS, Swanson PA, Lambeth JD, Jones RM, Nusrat A, Neish AS (2014) Redox signaling regulates commensal-mediated mucosal homeostasis and restitution and requires formyl peptide receptor 1. Mucosal Immunol 7:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alzaid M, Roth J, Wang Y, Almutairi E, Brown SL, Dumitrica T, Hobbie EK (2017) Enhancing the elasticity of ultrathin single-wall carbon nanotube films with colloidal nanocrystals. Langmuir 33:7889–7895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azzam F, Siqueira E, Fort S, Hassaini R, Pignon F, Travelet C, Putaux JL, Jean B (2016) Tunable aggregation and gelation of thermoresponsive suspensions of polymer-grafted cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromol 17:2112–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84:975–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Lai C, Marchewka R, Berry RM, Tam KC (2016) Use of CdS quantum dot-functionalized cellulose nanocrystal films for anti-counterfeiting applications. Nanoscale 8:13288–13296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Chen S, Wang B, Yao J, Wang H (2017) TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose nanofibers-supported gold nanoparticles with superior catalytic properties. Carbohydr Polym 160:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galland S, Andersson RL, Salajková M, Ström V, Olsson RT, Berglund LA (2013) Cellulose nanofibers decorated with magnetic nanoparticles—synthesis, structure and use in magnetized high toughness membranes for a prototype loudspeaker. J Mater Chem C 1:7963–7972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gandhi SS, Chien L (2016) High transmittance optical films based on quantum dot doped nanoscale polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Opt Mater 54:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He L, Tjong SC (2016) Nanostructured transparent conductive films: fabrication, characterization and applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 109:1–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hiraoki R, Ono Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2015) Molecular mass and molecular-mass distribution of TEMPO-oxidized celluloses and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromol 16:675–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isogai A, Kato Y (1998) Preparation of polyuronic acid from cellulose by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 5:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang F, Hsieh Y (2016) Self-assembling of TEMPO oxidized cellulose nanofibrils as affected by protonation of surface carboxyls and drying methods. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Junka K, Guo J, Filpponen I, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2014) Modification of cellulose nanofibrils with luminescent carbon dots. Biomacromol 15:876–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuramae R, Saito T, Isogai A (2014) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils prepared from various plant holocelluloses. React Funct Polym 85:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li X, Chen S, Hu W, Shi S, Shen W, Zhang X, Wang H (2009) In situ synthesis of CdS nanoparticles on bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym 76:509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Zhang J, Guo Y, Chen M, Wang L, Sun R, Wang X (2016) Cellulosic micelles as nanocapsules of liposoluble CdSe/ZnS quantum dots for bioimaging. J Mater Chem B 4:6454–6461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu S, Ke D, Zeng J, Zhou J, Peng T, Zhang L (2011) Construction of inorganic nanoparticles by micro-nano-porous structure of cellulose matrix. Cellulose 18:945–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahfoudhi N, Boufi S (2017) Nanocellulose as a novel nanostructured adsorbent for environmental remediation: a review. Cellulose 24:1171–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCumiskey EJ, Chandrasekhar N, Taylor CR (2010) Nanomechanics of CdSe quantum dot–polymer nanocomposite films. Nanotechnology 21:225703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23:93–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park J, Jeong S, Bang J, Kim B, Doh H, Cho C, Hwang S, Kim S (2016) Formation and stepwise self-assembly of cadmium chalcogenide nanocrystals to colloidal supra-quantum dots and the superlattices. Chem Mater 28:5329–5335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Purohit A, Chander S, Nehra SP, Lal C, Dhaka MS (2015) Effect of thickness on structural, optical, electrical and morphological properties of nanocrystalline CdSe thin films for optoelectronic applications. Opt Mater 47:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qin H, Dong J, Lee Y (2017) Fabrication and electrical characterization of multi-layer capacitive touch sensors on flexible substrates by additive e-jet printing. J Manuf Process 28:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raja SN, Olson ACK, Limaye A, Thorkelsson K, Luong A, Lin L, Ritchie RO, Xu T, Alivisatos AP (2015) Influence of three-dimensional nanoparticle branching on the Young’s modulus of nanocomposites: effect of interface orientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:6533–6538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robel I, Kuno M, Kamat PV (2007) Size-dependent electron injection from excited CdSe quantum dots into TiO2 nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 129:4136–4137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruan D, Huang Q, Zhang L (2005) Structure and properties of CdS/regenerated cellulose nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 290:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Samadi-Maybodi A, Sadeghi-Maleki M (2016) In-situ synthesis of high stable CdS quantum dots and their application for photocatalytic degradation of dyes. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 152:156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sannicolo T, Lagrange M, Cabos A, Celle C, Simonato J, Bellet D (2016) Metallic nanowire-based transparent electrodes for next generation flexible devices: a review. Small 12:6052–6075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Satnami ML, Vaishanav SK, Nagwanshi R, Ghosh KK (2015) CdS quantum dots: aqueous synthesis, spectroscopic and microscopic investigation. J Indian Chem Soc 92:1–9Google Scholar
  32. Sekhar H, Kumar YR, Rao DN (2015) Preparation, structural and linear optical properties of Zn doped CdS nanopowders. IOP Sci 73:012079Google Scholar
  33. Singh M, Kaushik A, Ahuja D (2016) Surface functionalization of nanofibrillated cellulose extracted from wheat straw: effect of process parameters. Carbohydr Polym 50:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Souza VHR, Husmann S, Neiva EGC, Lisboa FS, Lopes LC, Salvatierra RV, Zarbin AJG (2016) Flexible, transparent and thin films of carbon nanomaterials as electrodes for electrochemical applications. Electrochim Acta 197:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suresh S (2014) Studies on the dielectric properties of CdS nanoparticles. Appl Nanosci 4:325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tang A, Yao B, Xu L, Wu H (2013) Synthesis and characterization of nano-crystalline cellulose/CdS opto-electric nano-composites. Chin J Mater Res 27:178–182Google Scholar
  37. Tang A, Liu Y, Wang Q, Chen R, Liu W, Fang Z, Wang L (2016) A new photoelectric ink based on nanocellulose/CdS quantum dots for screen-printing. Carbohydr Polym 148:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang Y, Zhang S, Bai W, Zheng J (2016a) Layer-by-layer assembly of copper nanoparticles and manganese dioxide-multiwalled carbon nanotubes film: a new nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor for glucose. Talanta 149:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang H, Jin T, Zheng X, Jiang B, Zhu C, Yuan X, Zheng J, Wu M (2016b) Influence of two different template removal methods on the micromorphology, crystal structure, and photocatalytic activity of hollow CdS nanospheres. J Nanopart Res 18:339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warren BE (1969) X-ray diffraction. Courier Corporation, North ChelmsfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Weishaupt R, Siqueira G, Schubert M, Tingaut P, Weber KM, Zimmermann T, Meyer LT, Faccio G, Ihssen J (2015) TEMPO-oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose as a high density carrier for bioactive molecules. Biomacromol 16:3640–3650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xue J, Song F, Yin X, Wang X, Wang Y (2015) Let it shine: a transparent and photoluminescent foldable nanocellulose/quantum dot paper. ACS Appl Mater Int 7:10076–10079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yalcinkaya EE, Puglia D, Fortunati E, Bertoglio F, Bruni G, Visai L, Kenny JM (2017) Cellulose nanocrystals as templates for cetyltrimethylammonium bromide mediated synthesis of Ag nanoparticles and their novel use in PLA films. Carbohydr Polym 157:1557–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang J, Yu J, Fan J, Sun D, Tang W, Yang X (2011) Biotemplated preparation of CdS nanoparticles/bacterial cellulose hybrid nanofibers for photocatalysis application. J Hazard Mater 189:377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang-yuan Yan
    • 1
  • Zhi-qiang Fang
    • 1
  • Ai-min Tang
    • 1
  • Wang-yu Liu
    • 2
  • Yuan Liu
    • 1
  • Hai-zhen Shi
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Automotive EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations