Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 2259–2272 | Cite as

Hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose to ethylene glycol over carbon nanotubes supported Ru–W bimetallic catalysts

  • Lucília S. Ribeiro
  • Joana Órfão
  • José J. de Melo Órfão
  • M. Fernando R. Pereira
Original Paper
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Ru and W mono- and bimetallic catalysts supported on carbon nanotubes were prepared and characterized by different techniques. The prepared catalysts were then tested for the one-pot conversion of cellulose to ethylene glycol. The influence of several factors, such as nature of metal, metal loading, amount of catalyst, catalytic support, hydrogen pressure, reaction temperature and stirring rate, was investigated. When Ru was incorporated into the supported tungsten catalyst a promoting effect was observed, with a great increase in the yield of ethylene glycol, which was explained by the interaction between both metals. The results showed that cellulose could be efficiently converted into ethylene glycol with a yield of 40% after just 3 h of reaction using 0.8%Ru–30%W/CNT as catalyst, at a temperature of 205 °C and H2 pressure of 50 bar. Moreover, the catalyst showed good stability after repeated use, at least up to four cycles, and no tungsten leaching to solution was observed.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Hydrolytic hydrogenation Cellulose Ethylene glycol Carbon nanotubes Ru–W catalysts 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is a result of project “AIProcMat@N2020—Advanced Industrial Processes and Materials for a Sustainable Northern Region of Portugal 2020”, with the reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000006, supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and of Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006984—Associate Laboratory LSRE-LCM funded by ERDF through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI)—and by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10570_2018_1721_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (433 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 433 kb)

References

  1. Ahlkvist J, Ajaikumar S, Larsson W, Mikkola J-P (2013) One-pot catalytic conversion of Nordic pulp media into green platform chemicals. Appl Catal A-Gen 454:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almohalla M, Rodríguez-Ramos I, Ribeiro LS, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR, Guerrero-Ruiz A (2018) Cooperative action of heteropolyacids and carbon supported Ru catalysts for the conversion of cellulose. Catal Today 301:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao Y, Wang J, Kang M, Zhu Y (2014) Efficient synthesis of ethylene glycol from cellulose over Ni–WO3/SBA-15 catalysts. J Mol Catal A-Chem 381:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao Y-L, Wang J-W, Kang M-Q, Zhu Y-L (2016) Catalytic conversion of glucose and cellobiose into ethylene glycol over various tunsgten-based catalysts. J Fuel Chem Technol 44:845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai J, Zhu S, Cen Y, Guo J, Wang J, Fan W (2017) Effect of tungsten surface density of WO3–ZrO2 on its catalytic performance in hydrogenolysis of cellulose to ethylene glycol. RSC Adv 7:8567–8574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chheda JN, Huber GW, Dumesic JA (2007) Liquid-phase catalytic processing of biomass-derived oxygenated hydrocarbons to fuels and chemicals. Angew Chem Int Edit 46:7164–7183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng W, Tan X, Fang W, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2009) Conversion of cellulose into sorbitol over carbon nanotube-supported ruthenium catalyst. Catal Lett 133:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fukuoka A, Dhepe P (2006) Catalytic conversion of cellulose into sugar alcohols. Angew Chem Int Edit 45:5161–5163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem Rev 106:4044–4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji N, Zhang T, Zheng M, Wang A, Wang H, Wang X, Chen JG (2008) Direct catalytic conversion of cellulose into ethylene glycol using nickel-promoted tungsten carbide catalysts. Angew Chem Int Edit 47:8510–8513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ji N, Zhang T, Zheng M, Wang A, Wang H, Wang X, Shu Y, Stottlemyer AL, Chen JG (2009) Catalytic conversion of cellulose into ethylene glycol over supported carbide catalysts. Catal Today 147:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kobayashi H, Yamakoshi Y, Hosaka Y, Yabushita M, Fukuoka A (2014) Production of sugar alcohols from real biomass by supported platinum catalyst. Catal Today 226:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Y, Liu H (2016) Kinetic insight into the effect of the catalytic functions on selective conversion of cellulose to polyols on carbon-supported WO3 and Ru catalysts. Catal Today 269:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu Y, Luo C, Liu H (2012) Tungsten trioxide promoted selective conversion of cellulose into propylene glycol and ethylene glycol on a ruthenium catalyst. Angew Chemie 124:3303–3307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu H, Qin L, Wang X, Du C, Sun D, Meng X (2016a) Hydrolytic hydro-conversion of cellulose to ethylene glycol over bimetallic CNTs-supported NiWB amorphous alloy catalyst. Catal Commun 77:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu S, Okuyama Y, Tamura M, Nakagawa Y, Imai A, Tomishige K (2016b) Selective transformation of hemicellulose (xylan) into n-pentane, pentanols or xylitol over a rhenium-modified iridium catalyst combined with acids. Green Chem 18:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu Z, Kanan SM, Tripp CP (2002) Synthesis of high surface area monoclinic WO3 particles using organic ligands and emulsion based methods. J Mater Chem 12:983–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manaenkov OV, Mann JJ, Kislitza OV, Losovyj Y, Stein BD, Morgan DG, Pink M, Lependina OL, Shifrina ZB, Matveeva VG, Sulman EM, Bronstein LM (2016) Ru-containing magnetically recoverable catalysts: a sustainable pathway from cellulose to ethylene and propylene glycols. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:21285–21293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ribeiro LS, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR (2015a) Enhanced direct production of sorbitol by cellulose ball-milling. Green Chem 17:2973–2980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ribeiro LS, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR (2015b) Comparative study of different catalysts for the direct conversion of cellulose to sorbitol. Green Process Synth 4:71–78Google Scholar
  21. Ribeiro LS, Delgado JJ, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR (2017a) Carbon supported Ru-Ni catalysts for the enhanced one-pot conversion of cellulose to sorbitol. Appl Catal B-Environ 217:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribeiro LS, Delgado JJ, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR (2017b) Direct conversion of cellulose to sorbitol over ruthenium catalysts: influence of the support. Catal Today 279:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodella CB, Barrett DH, Moya SF, Figueroa SJA, Pimenta MTB, Curvelo AAS, da Silva VT (2015) Physical and chemical studies of tungsten carbide catalysts: effects of Ni promotion and sulphonated carbon. RSC Adv 5:23874–23885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruppert AM, Niewiadomski M, Grams J, Kwapiński W (2014) Optimization of Ni/ZrO2 catalytic performance in thermochemical cellulose conversion for enhanced hydrogen production. Appl Catal B-Environ 145:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Serrano-Ruiz JC, Luque R, Sepulveda-Escribano A (2011) Transformations of biomass-derived platform molecules: from high added-value chemicals to fuelsvia aqueous-phase processing. Chem Soc Rev 40:5266–5281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tai Z, Zhang J, Wang A, Pang J, Zheng M, Zhang T (2013) Catalytic conversion of cellulose to ethylene glycol over a low-cost binary catalyst of raney ni and tungstic acid. Chemsuschem 6:652–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verendel JJ, Nordlund M, Andersson PG (2013) Selective metal-catalyzed transfer of H2 and CO from polyols to alkenes. Chemsuschem 6:426–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang A, Zhang T (2013) One-Pot conversion of cellulose to ethylene glycol with multifunctional tungsten-based catalysts. Acc Chem Res 46:1377–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang H, Zhu L, Peng S, Peng F, Yu H, Yang J (2012) High efficient conversion of cellulose to polyols with Ru/CNTs as catalyst. Renew Energy 37:192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Werpy T, Petersen G (2004) Top value-added chemicals from biomass. Volume 1: results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Battelle)Google Scholar
  31. Xiao Z-Q, Mao J-W, Ji J-B, Sha R-Y, Fan Y, Xing C (2017) Preparation of nano-scale nickel-tungsten catalysts by pH value control and application in hydrogenolysis of cellulose to polyols. J Fuel Chem Technol 45:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu S, Yan X, Bu Q, Xia H (2017) Catalytic conversion of cellulose into polyols using carbon-nanotube-supported monometallic Pd and bimetallic Pd–Fe catalysts. Cellulose 24:2403–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang P, Kobayashi H, Fukuoka A (2011) Recent developments in the catalytic conversion of cellulose into valuable chemicals. Chin J Catal 32:716–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang L, Yan X, Wang Q, Wang Q, Xia H (2015) One-pot catalytic conversion of cellulose into polyols with Pt/CNTs catalysts. Carbohyd Res 404:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yue H, Zhao Y, Ma X, Gong J (2012) Ethylene glycol: properties, synthesis, and applications. Chem Soc Rev 41:4218–4244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang HX, Yang BQ, Feng PX (2008) Ambient pressure synthesis of nanostructured tungsten oxide crystalline films. J Nanomater 2008:1–5Google Scholar
  37. Zhang Y, Wang A, Zhang T (2010) A new 3D mesoporous carbon replicated from commercial silica as a catalyst support for direct conversion of cellulose into ethylene glycol. Chem Commun 46:862–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao G, Zheng M, Wang A, Zhang T (2010) Catalytic conversion of cellulose to ethylene glycol over tungsten phosphide catalysts. Chin J Catal 31:928–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao X, Xu J, Wang A, Zhang T (2015) Porous carbon in catalytic transformation of cellulose. Chin J Catal 36:1419–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zheng MY, Wang AQ, Ji N, Pang JF, Wang XD, Zhang T (2010) Transition metal-tungsten bimetallic catalysts for the conversion of cellulose into ethylene glycol. Chemsuschem 3:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Processos de Separação e Reação - Laboratório de Catálise e Materiais (LSRE-LCM), Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations