Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 357–366 | Cite as

Key role of anionic trash catching system on the efficiency of lignocellulose nanofibers in industrial recycled slurries

  • Quim Tarrés
  • María Cristina Area
  • María Evangelina Vallejos
  • Nanci Vanesa Ehman
  • Marc Delgado-Aguilar
  • Pere Mutjé
Original Paper
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

The processing of recycled paper into packaging materials is becoming one of the most important activities of paper mills. However, the use of recycled paper as a raw material causes an important increase of dissolved colloidal substances in industrial waters, known as anionic trash, which greatly increases water conductivity and cationic demand disturbing the function of commonly used retention agents (cationic starch, cationic polyacrylamides). On the other hand, several investigators showed that lignocellulosic nanofibers (LCNF) can be used as reinforcement in papermaking, but their retention can be affected by anionic trash. This work aims to study the technical viability of the application of triticale straw lignocellulose nanofibers in recycled fiber suspensions at industrial scale. For this purpose, a complex retention system of LCNF was proposed to improve the reinforcement efficiency of LCNF. Results show that, with the addition of only 1.5% (w/w) of LCNF, it is possible to fulfill the physical–mechanical requirements of the commercial test liner, and the addition of 4.5% of LCNF would allow the reduction of basis weight and additives or the development of applications with higher mechanical requirements.

Keywords

Anionic trash Colloidal substances Industrial water Lignocellulose nanofibers Papermaking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Economy and Competitiveness Ministry of the Spanish Government by the project CTQ2013–48090–C2–2–R.

References

  1. Afra E, Yousefi H, Hadilam MM, Nishino T (2013) Comparative effect of mechanical beating and nanofibrillation of cellulose on paper properties made from bagasse and softwood pulps. Carbohydr Polym 97(2):725–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1996) Important properties of colloidal silica in microparticulate systems. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 11(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boufi S, Gandini A (2015) Triticale crop residue: a cheap material for high performance nanofibrillated cellulose. RSC Adv 5(5):3141–3151.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA12918K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boufi S, González I, Delgado-aguilar M, Tarrés Q, Pèlach MÀ, Mutjé P (2016) Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process : A review. Carbohydr Polym 154:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrasco F, Mutje P, Pelach MA (1998) Control of retention in paper-making by colloid titration and zeta potential techniques. Wood Sci Technol 32(2):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Pèlach MA, De La Fuente E, Negro C, Mutjé P (2015a) Improvement of deinked old newspaper/old magazine pulp suspensions by means of nanofibrillated cellulose addition. Cellulose 22(1):789–802.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0473-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado-aguilar M, González I, Tarrés Q, Alcalà M, Pèlach MÀ (2015b) Approaching a low-cost production of cellulose nanofibers for papermaking applications. BioResourses 10(3):5345–5355Google Scholar
  8. Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrés Q, Puig J, Boufi S, Blanco A, Mutjé P (2015c) Enzymatic refining and cellulose nanofiber addition in papermaking processes from recycled and deinked slurries. BioResources 10(3):5730–5743Google Scholar
  9. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Tarrés Q, Pèlach MA, Alcalà M, Mutjé P (2016) The key role of lignin in the production of low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibers for papermaking applications. Ind Crops Prod 86:295–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desharnais L, Chabot B, Daneault C, Montplaisir D, Croteau L (2002) Thermomechanical pulp washing effect of retention and drainage. Pulp Pap Can 103(4):44–48Google Scholar
  11. Dunham AJ, Sherman LM, Alfano JC (2002) Effect of dissolved and colloidal substances on drainage properties of mechanical pulp suspensions. J Pulp Pap Sci 28(9):298–304Google Scholar
  12. Espinosa E, Tarrés Q, Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Mutjé P, Rodríguez A (2016) Suitability of wheat straw semichemical pulp for the fabrication of lignocellulosic nanofibres and their application to papermaking slurries. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0807-8 Google Scholar
  13. Fernandes Diniz J, Gil MH, Castro JAAM (2004) Hornification—its origin and interpretation in wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol 37:489–494.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-003-0216-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garver TM, Xie T, Boegh KH (1997) Variation of white water composition in a TMP and DIP newsprint paper machine. Tappi J 80(8):163–173Google Scholar
  15. Gill RIS (1996) Chemical control of deposits: scopes and limitations. Pap Technol 37(6):23–31Google Scholar
  16. González I, Boufi S, Pèlach MA, Alcalà M, Vilaseca F, Mutjé P (2012) Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps. BioResources 7(4):5167–5180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hietala M, Ämmälä A, Silvennoinen J, Liimatainen H (2015) Fluting medium strengthened by periodate–chlorite oxidized nanofibrillated celluloses. Cellul.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0801-1 Google Scholar
  18. Hubbe MA (2014) Prospects for maintaining strength of paper and paperboard products while using less forest resources: A review. BioResources 9(1):1634–1763Google Scholar
  19. Hubbe MA, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ (2007) What happens to cellulosic fibers during papermaking and recycling? A Review. BioResourse 2:739–788Google Scholar
  20. Hubbe MA, Sundberg A, Mocchiutti P, Ni Y, Pelton R (2012) Dissolved and colloidal substances (dcs) and the charge demand of papermaking process waters and suspensions: a review. BioResources 7(4):6109–6193Google Scholar
  21. Hurter RW (2002a) Nonwood fiber content papers-Part1: Corrugating medium physical properties. HurterConsultGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurter RW (2002b) Nonwood fiber content papers-Part2: Unbleached papers physical properties. HurterConsultGoogle Scholar
  23. ISO (1990) ISO 187:1990: Paper, board and pulps—Standard atmosphere for conditioning and testing and procedure for monitoring the atmosphere and conditioning of samplesGoogle Scholar
  24. ISO (1999) ISO 5267-1:1999: Pulps—Determination of drainability—Part 1: Schopper-riegler methodGoogle Scholar
  25. ISO. (2008a). ISO 1924-2:2008: Paper and board—Determination of tensile properties—Part 2: constant rate of elongation method (20 mm/min)Google Scholar
  26. ISO (2008b) ISO 5269-2:2004 Pulps—Preparation of laboratory sheets for physical testing—Part 2: Rapid-Köthen methodGoogle Scholar
  27. ISO. (2011). ISO 534:2011: Paper and board—Determination of thickness, density and specific volumeGoogle Scholar
  28. ISO. (2012). ISO 1974:2012: Paper—Determination tearing resistance—Elmendorf methodGoogle Scholar
  29. ISO. (2013). ISO 5636-5:2013: Paper and board—Determination of air permeance (medium range)—Part 5: Gurley methodGoogle Scholar
  30. ISO. (2014). ISO 2758:2014: Paper—Determination of bursting strengthGoogle Scholar
  31. Korhonen MH, Laine J (2014) Flocculation and retention of fillers with nanoceluloses. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29(1):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lourenço AF, Gamelas JAF, Nunes T, Amaral J, Mutjé P, Ferreira PJ (2017) Influence of TEMPO-oxidised cellulose nanofibrils on the properties of filler-containing papers. Cellulose 24(1):349–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1121-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miao Q, Huang L, Chen L (2013) Advances in the control of dissolved and colloidal substances present in papermaking processes: a brief review. BioResources 8(1):1431–1455Google Scholar
  34. Neimo L (1999) Papermaking Chemistry. In: Gullichsen J, Paulapuro H (eds). Jyväskylä: Fapet OyGoogle Scholar
  35. Pöyry (2011) Average papermaking fibre furnish the world 1990–2025. Pulp and RP Consumption 1995–2025, World Fibre Outlook, Pöyry LLCGoogle Scholar
  36. Rouger J, Mutje P (1984) Correlation between the cellulose fibres beating and the fixation of a soluble cationic polymer. Br Polym J 16(2):83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salmi J (2009) Surface interactions in polyelectrolyte-cellulose systems and their implications for flocculation mechanisms. Helsinki University of Technology, TKKGoogle Scholar
  38. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose for enhancement of strength in high-density paper structures. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28(2):182–189.  https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2013-28- CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shetty CS, Greer CS, Laubach GD (1994) A likely mechanism for pitch deposition control. Tappi J 77(10):91–96Google Scholar
  40. Swerin A, Ödberg L (1996) Flocculation of cellulosic fibre suspensions by a microparticulate retention aid system consisting of cationic polyacrylamide and anionic montmotillonite. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 11(1):22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17(5):1005–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9431-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. TAPPI (2014) T569 om-14: internal bond strength (Scott type)Google Scholar
  43. Tarrés Q, Saguer E, Pèlach MA, Alcalà M, Delgado-Aguilar M, Mutjé P (2016) The feasibility of incorporating cellulose micro/nanofibers in papermaking processes: the relevance of enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0889-y Google Scholar
  44. Tarrés Q, Ehman NV, Evangelina M, Area MC, Delgado-aguilar M, Mutjé P (2017) Lignocellulosic nanofibers from triticale straw: the influence of hemicelluloses and lignin in their production and properties. Carbohyd Polym 163:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Ni J, Chen C, Peng J, Liu H (2014) Anionic trash control in high-yield pulp (HYP) containing furnish by using a poly-DADMAC based commercial formulation. J Ind Eng Chem 20(6):4452–4456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whipple WL, Maltesh C (2002) Adsorption of cationic flocculants to paper slurries. J Colloid Interface Sci 256(1):33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang X, Beatson RP, Cai YJ, Saddler JN (1999) Accumulation of specific dissolved and colloidal substances during white water recycling affects paper properties. J Pulp Pap Sci 25(6):206–210Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEPAMAP Research GroupUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.Programa de Celulosa y PapelInstituto de Materiales de Misiones, IMAM (UNaM-CONICET)MisionesArgentina

Personalised recommendations