Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 473–483 | Cite as

Mechanical, thermal properties and curing kinetics of liquid silicone rubber filled with cellulose nanocrystal

Original Paper
  • 233 Downloads

Abstract

To prepare liquid silicone rubber (LSR)/cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) nanocomposite, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) was used to modify the surface of CNC to improve the interfacial interaction between the hydrophilic CNC and the hydrophobic LSR. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and energy dispersive spectrometer results demonstrated that APTES modified CNC successfully. It was found that small amount of modified CNC (M-CNC) had better reinforcement than SiO2 in LSR nanocomposites, the tensile strength and the strain at break of LSR increased over 85% and 44% by adding 1.5 wt% M-CNC. However, DSC and rheology tests indicated that APTES modified CNC increased the curing temperature of LSR and limited the addition of CNC, which was attributed to poisoning of Pt catalyst by APTES. Furthermore, small amount of M-CNC improved the thermal stability of LSR, the TGA results showed that the 10% weight loss temperature (T10%) of LSR increased 56 °C with 1.0 wt% addition of M-CNC.

Keywords

Cellulose nanocrystal Liquid silicone rubber Curing kinetics Mechanical properties 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (201504603), the Program for key Science and Technology Team of Zhejiang Province (2013TD17), the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (21404092), Science and technology innovation program for college students of Zhejiang Province (2016R412040), the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51603189) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LQ14C160004).

References

  1. Anzlovar A, Huskic M, Zagar E (2016) Modification of nanocrystalline cellulose for application as a reinforcing nanofiller in PMMA composites. Cellulose 23:505–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okana T (1999) Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension. J Wood Sci 45:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrieta MP, Fortunati E, Dominici F, Lopez J, Kenny JM (2015) Bionanocomposite films based on plasticized PLA-PHB/cellulose nanocrystal blends. Carbohydr Polym 121:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromol 6:1048–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben Elmabrouk A, Thielemans W, Dufresne A, Boufi S (2009) Preparation of poly(styrene-co-hexylacrylate)/cellulose whiskers nanocomposites via miniemulsion polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 114:2946–2955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Menezes AJ, Siqueira G, Curvelo AAS, Dufresne A (2009) Extrusion and characterization of functionalized cellulose whiskers reinforced polyethylene nanocomposites. Polymer 50:4552–4563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delebecq E, Ganachaud F (2012) Looking over liquid silicone rubbers: (1) network topology vs chemical formulations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3340–3352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delebecq E, Hamdani-Devarennes S, Raeke J, Lopez Cuesta J-M, Ganachaud F (2011) High residue contents indebted by platinum and silica synergistic action during the pyrolysis of silicone formulations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:869–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubief D, Samain E, Dufresne A (1999) Polysaccharide microcrystals reinforced amorphous poly(beta-hydroxyoctanoate) nanocomposite materials. Macromolecules 32:5765–5771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emami Z, Meng QK, Pircheraghi G, Manas-Zloczower I (2015) Use of surfactants in cellulose nanowhisker/epoxy nanocomposites: effect on filler dispersion and system properties. Cellulose 22:3161–3176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Favier V, Canova GR, Cavaillé JY, Chanzy H, Dufresne A, Gauthier C (1995) Nanocomposite materials from latex and cellulose whiskers. Polym Adv Technol 6:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frone AN, Berlioz S, Chailan JF, Panaitescu DM, Donescu D (2011) Cellulose fiber-reinforced polylactic acid. Polym Compos 32:976–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gousse C, Chanzy H, Excoffier G, Soubeyrand L, Fleury E (2002) Stable suspensions of partially silylated cellulose whiskers dispersed in organic solvents. Polymer 43:2645–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 43:1519–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harkous A, Colomines G, Leroy E, Mousseau P, Deterre R (2016) The kinetic behavior of liquid silicone rubber: a comparison between thermal and rheological approaches based on gel point determination. React Funct Polym 101:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassanabadi HM, Alemdar A, Rodrigue D (2015) Polypropylene reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose: Coupling agent optimization. J Appl Polym Sci 132:42438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoeng F, Denneulin A, Bras J (2016) Use of nanocellulose in printed electronics: a review. Nanoscale 8:13131–13154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis LN, Stein J, Gao Y, Colborn RE, Hutchins G (1997) Platinum catalysts used in the silicones industry. Their synthesis and activity in hydrosilylation. Platin Met Rev 41:66–75Google Scholar
  20. Mariano M, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2016) Cellulose nanocrystal reinforced oxidized natural rubber nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 137:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mariot D, Caro-Bretelle AS, Ienny P, Ganachaud F (2015) Influence of the grafting topology of hydrophobic silica surfaces on the mechanical properties of silicone high consistency rubbers. Polym Int 64:1128–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muka I, Huba A (2008) The comparison of solid silicone rubber types manufactured by diverse technologies. Mater Sci Forum 589:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oksman K et al (2016) Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 83:2–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pei A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Functionalized cellulose nanocrystals as biobased nucleation agents in poly(L-lactide) (PLLA)—crystallization and mechanical property effects. Compos Sci Technol 70:815–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salmieri S et al (2014) Antimicrobial nanocomposite films made of poly(lactic acid)-cellulose nanocrystals (PLA-CNC) in food applications: part A-effect of nisin release on the inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in ham. Cellulose 21:1837–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu Q, Meng Y, Concha K, Wang S, Li Y, Ma L, Fu S (2013) Influence of temperature and humidity on nano-mechanical properties of cellulose nanocrystal films made from switchgrass and cotton. Ind Crop Prod 48:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu G, Chen J, Huo S, Liu G, Kong Z (2014a) Thermoset nanocomposites from two-component waterborne polyurethanes and cellulose whiskers. Carbohydr Polym 105:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu Q, Meng Y, Wang S, Li Y, Fu S, Ma L, Harper D (2014b) Rheological Behavior of Cellulose Nanocrystal Suspension: Influence of Concentration and Aspect Ratio. J Appl Polym Sci 131:40525Google Scholar
  29. Wu Q, Li X, Fu S, Li Q, Wang S (2017) Estimation of aspect ratio of cellulose nanocrystals by viscosity measurement: influence of surface charge density and NaCl concentration. Cellulose 24:3255–3264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu P, Wang XX, Hu YD, Ding YS (2016) Piezoresistive properties of nanocomposites based on silicone rubber and ionic liquid-functionalized carbon black. Mater Lett 182:218–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao X, Zang C, Wen Y, Jiao Q (2015) Thermal and mechanical properties of liquid silicone rubber composites filled with functionalized graphene oxide. J Appl Polym Sci 132:42582Google Scholar
  32. Zhu X, Zhang J (2013) The fundamentals of organosilicon material. Chemical Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu M et al (2016) Transparent and haze wood composites for highly efficient broadband light management in solar cells. Nano Energy 26:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringZhejiang A&F UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.National Engineering and Technology Research Center of Wood-based Resources Comprehensive UtilizationHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Center for Renewable CarbonUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  4. 4.Zhejiang Liniz Fine Chemical Co. LtdLin’anChina

Personalised recommendations