Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 683–695 | Cite as

Towards a new generation of functional fiber-based packaging: cellulose nanofibers for improved barrier, mechanical and surface properties

  • Quim Tarrés
  • Helena Oliver-Ortega
  • Paulo J. Ferreira
  • M. Àngels Pèlach
  • Pere Mutjé
  • Marc Delgado-Aguilar
Original Paper
  • 296 Downloads

Abstract

The present work shows the suitability of using industrial fluting papers as raw material for the development of four different substrates, enzymatically refined and/or containing cellulose nanofibers (CNF) in bulk. These four substrates were deeply studied and treated with different coating formulations, containing CNF, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), native starch and alkyl ketene dimer, with the purpose of evaluating the benefits of using fiber-based packaging paper with improved mechanical, physical and barrier properties. The results showed that if CNF are coated in combination with PVA the tensile properties of paper can be significantly improved, as well as the grease resistance, whereas the air permeability and water vapor transmission rate decrease. The obtained papers present interesting vapor and air barrier properties, at the same time that unconceivable limits of breaking length are achieved (6.44 km). In addition, when a second layer of alkyl ketene dimer was coated on both sides of paper, the water contact angle was significantly improved, being higher than 115°. Overall, the present work shows the feasibility of recycled fibers for the production of high value-added papers that can be used for packaging purposes due to their improved barrier and mechanical properties, and contributes therefore for the bio-based circular economy.

Keywords

Cellulose nanofibers Polyvinyl alcohol Recycled paper Packaging Barrier properties 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry to the project CTQ2013-48090-C2-2-R, as well as CYTED for the networking support in the frame of the project P316RT0095 - Red temática NANOCELIA.

References

  1. Allaoui S, Aboura Z, Benzeggagh ML (2009) Effects of the environmental conditions on the mechanical behaviour of the corrugated cardboard. Compos Sci Technol 69:104–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17:559–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balea A, Blanco Á, Monte MC et al (2016) Effect of bleached eucalyptus and pine cellulose nanofibers on the physico-mechanical properties of cartonboard. BioResources 11:8123–8138Google Scholar
  4. Biricik Y, Atik C (2012) Effect of cellulase treatment of long fiber fraction on strength properties of recycled corrugated medium. Afr J Biotechnol 11:12199–12205.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boufi S, González I, Delgado-Aguilar M et al (2016) Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: a review. Carbohydr Polym 154:151–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CEPI (2011) The forest fibre industry: 2050 roadmap to a low-carbon bio-economy. 1–46. Available at: http://www.unfoldthefuture.eu/
  7. CEPI (2016) Key statistics 2015. Available at: http://www.cepi.org/statistics/keystatistics2015
  8. COST (2014) Memorandum of understanding COST FP1405—ActinPak. 1–29. Available at: http://www.actinpak.eu/
  9. De Marco JL, Felix CR (2007) Purification and characterization of a β-glucanase produced by Trichoderma harzianum showing biocontrol potential. Braz Arch Biol Technol 50:21–29.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132007000100003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Tarrés Q et al (2015a) Approaching a low-cost production of cellulose nanofibers for papermaking applications. BioResources 10:5345–5355.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.3.5330-5344 Google Scholar
  11. Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrés Q, Pèlach MÀ et al (2015b) Are cellulose nanofibers a solution for a more circular economy of paper products? Environ Sci Technol 49:12206–12213.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrés Q, Puig J et al (2015c) Enzymatic refining and cellulose nanofiber addition in papermaking processes from recycled and deinked. BioResources 4:5730–5743Google Scholar
  13. Espinosa E, Tarrés Q, Delgado-Aguilar M et al (2016) Suitability of wheat straw semichemical pulp for the fabrication of lignocellulosic nanofibres and their application to papermaking slurries. Cellulose 23:837–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0807-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González I, Alcala M, Arbat G et al (2013) Suitability of rapeseed chemithermomechanical pulp as raw material in papermaking. BioResources 8:1697–1708.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.2.1697-1708 Google Scholar
  15. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hii C, Gregersen Ø, Chinga-Carrasco G, Eriksen Ø (2012) The effect of MFC on the pressability and paper properties of TMP and GCC based sheets. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27:388–396.  https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2012-27-02-p388-396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbe MA (2014) Prospects for maintaining strength of paper and paperboard products while using less forest resources: a review. BioResources 9:1634–1763Google Scholar
  18. Hult EL, Iotti M, Lenes M (2010) Efficient approach to high barrier packaging using microfibrillar cellulose and shellac. Cellulose 17:575–586.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9408-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00583e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Khelifi B, Bras J (2014) Impact of different coating processes of microfibrillated cellulose on the mechanical and barrier properties of paper. J Mater Sci 49:2879–2893.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7995-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X, Tian J, Shen W (2010) Progress in patterned paper sizing for fabrication of paper-based microfluidic sensors. Cellulose 17:649–659.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9401-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindström T, Larsson PT (2008) Alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) sizing: a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lizundia E, Delgado-Aguilar M, Mutjé P et al (2016) Cu-coated cellulose nanopaper for green and low-cost electronics. Cellulose 23:1997–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0920-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moral A, Aguado R, Tijero A et al (2017) High-yield pulp from Brassica napus to manufacture packaging paper. BioResource 12:2792–2804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nygårds S (2011) Nanocellulose in pigment coatings—aspects of barrier properties and printability in offset (Master’s Thesis). Linkoping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology and Innventia AB, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  27. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–1989.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0497769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2012) Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 13:842–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16:75–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tarrés Q, Delgado-Aguilar M, Pèlach MA et al (2016a) Remarkable increase of paper strength by combining enzymatic cellulose nanofibers in bulk and TEMPO-oxidized nanofibers as coating. Cellulose 23:3939–3950.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1073-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tarrés Q, Oliver-Ortega H, Llop M et al (2016b) Effective and simple methodology to produce nanocellulose-based aerogels for selective oil removal. Cellulose 23:3077–3088.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1017-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tarrés Q, Saguer E, Pèlach MA et al (2016c) The feasibility of incorporating cellulose micro/nanofibers in papermaking processes: the relevance of enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose 23:1433–1445.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0889-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tarrés Q, Pèlach MÀ, Alcalà M, Delgado-Aguilar M (2017) Cardboard boxes as raw material for high-performance papers through the implementation of alternative technologies: more than closing the loop. J Ind Eng Chem 54:52–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vaswani S, Koskinen J, Hess DW (2005) Surface modification of paper and cellulose by plasma-assisted deposition of fluorocarbon films. Surf Coat Technol 195:121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79:1086–1093.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEPAMAP Research GroupUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.CIEPQPF, Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations