, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 21–33 | Cite as

Surface accessibility of cellulose fibrils studied by hydrogen–deuterium exchange with water

  • E. L. Lindh
  • L. SalménEmail author
Original Paper


A problem with cellulose-based materials is that they are highly influenced by moisture, leading to reduced strength properties with increasing moisture content. By achieving a more detailed understanding of the water–cellulose interactions, the usage of cellulose-based materials could be better optimized. Two different exchange processes of cellulose hydroxyl/deuteroxyl groups have been monitored by transmission FT-IR spectroscopy. By using line-shape-assisted deconvolution of the changing intensities, we have been able to follow the exchange kinetics in a very detailed and controlled manner. The findings reveal a hydrogen exchange that mainly is located at two different kinds of fibril surfaces, where the differences arise from the water accessibility of that specific surface. The slowly accessible regions are proposed to be located between the fibrils inside of the aggregates, and the readily accessible regions are suggested to be at the surfaces of the fibril aggregates. It was also possible to identify the ratio of slowly and readily accessible surfaces, which indicated that the average aggregate of cotton cellulose is built up by approximately three fibrils with an assumed average size of 12 × 12 cellulose chains. Additionally, the experimental setup enabled visualizing and discussing the implications of some of the deviating spectral features that are pronounced when recording FT-IR spectra of deuterium-exchanging cellulose: the insufficient red shift of the stretching vibrations and the vastly decreasing line widths.


Cellulose Deuterium FT-IR Hydrogen bond Exchange Morphology 



We thank Leif Falk for the creation of the special-made box suitable for infrared measurements and Malin Bergenstråhle-Wohlert for all the helpful comments and discussions. Wallenberg Wood Science Center is gratefully acknowledged for the financial support.


Funding was provided by Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse.

Supplementary material

10570_2016_1122_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1462 kb)


  1. Agarwal V, Huber GW, Conner WC, Auerbach SM (2011) Simulating infrared spectra and hydrogen bonding in cellulose I beta at elevated temperatures. J Chem Phys 135:134506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardage S, Donaldson L, Tokoh C, Daniel G (2004) Ultrastructure of the cell wall of unbeaten Norway spruce pulp fibre surfaces. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 19:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassan P, Kohler A, Martens H, Lee J, Byrne HJ, Dumas P, Gazi E, Brown M, Clarke N, Gardner P (2010) Resonant Mie scattering (RMieS) correction of infrared spectra from highly scattering biological samples. Analyst 135:268–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedict H, Limbach HH, Wehlan M, Fehlhammer WP, Golubev NS, Janoschek R (1998) Solid state N-15 NMR and theoretical studies of primary and secondary geometric H/D isotope effects on low-barrier NHN-hydrogen bonds. J Am Chem Soc 120:2939–2950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulil B, Henri-Rousseau O, Blaise P (1988) Infrared spectra of hydrogen bonded species in solution. Chem Phys 126:263–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratos S (1975) Profiles of hydrogen stretching ir bands of molecules with hydrogen bonds: a stochastic theory. I. Weak and medium strength hydrogen bonds. J Chem Phys 63:3499–3509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cael JJ, Gardner KH, Koenig JL, Blackwell J (1975) Infrared and Raman spectroscopy of carbohydrates. Paper V. Normal coordinate analysis of cellulose I. J Chem Phys 62:1145–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carteret C (2009) Mid- and near-Infrared study of hydroxyl groups at a silica surface: H-bond effect. J Phys Chem C 113:13300–13308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding SY, Himmel ME (2006) The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 54:597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. England-Kretzer L, Fritzsche M, Luck WAP (1988) The intensity change of IR OH bands by H-bonds. J Mol Struct 175:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahlén J, Salmén L (2003) Cross-sectional structure of the secondary wall of wood fibers as affected by processing. J Mater Sci 38:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fengel D (1971) Ideas on the ultrastructural organization of the cell wall components. J Polym Sci Part C Polym Symp 36:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandes AN, Thomas LH, Altaner CM, Callow P, Forsyth VT, Apperley DC, Kennedy CJ, Jarvis MC (2011) Nanostructure of cellulose microfibrils in spruce wood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:E1195–E1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frilette VJ, Hanle J, Mark H (1948) Rate of exchange of cellulose with heavy water. J Am Chem Soc 70:1107–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinterstoisser B, Salmén L (2000) Application of dynamic 2D FTIR to cellulose. Vib Spectrosc 22:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinterstoisser B, Åkerholm M, Salmén L (2001) Effect of fiber orientation in dynamic FTIR study on native cellulose. Carbohydr Res 334:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofstetter K, Hinterstoisser B, Salmén L (2006) Moisture uptake in native cellulose—the roles of different hydrogen bonds: a dynamic FT-IR study using deuterium exchange. Cellulose 13:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horikawa Y, Sugiyama J (2008) Accessibility and size of Valonia cellulose microfibril studied by combined deuteration/rehydrogenation and FTIR technique. Cellulose 15:419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ibbett R, Wortmann F, Varga K, Schuster KC (2014) A morphological interpretation of water chemical exchange and mobility in cellulose materials derived from proton NMR T-2 relaxation. Cellulose 21:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ivanova NV, Korolenko EA, Korolik EV, Zhbankov RG (1989) IR spectrum of cellulose. J Appl Spectrosc 51:847–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeffries R (1963) An infra-red study of the deuteration of cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Polymer 4:375–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeffries R (1964) The amorphous fraction of cellulose and its relation to moisture sorption. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1213–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jung C (2000) Insight into protein structure and protein-ligand recognition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J Mol Recognit 13:325–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohler R, Dück R, Ausperger B, Alex R (2003) A numeric model for the kinetics of water vapor sorption on cellulosic reinforcement fibers. Compos Interfaces 10:255–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langan P, Petridis L, O’Neill HM, Pingali SV, Foston M, Nishiyama Y, Schulz R, Lindner B, Hanson BL, Harton S, Heller WT, Urban V, Evans BR, Gnanakaran S, Ragauskas AJ, Smith JC, Davison BH (2014) Common processes drive the thermochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem 16:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsson PT, Wickholm K, Iversen T (1997) A CP/MAS 13C NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohydr Res 302:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee CM, Kubicki JD, Fan B, Zhong L, Jarvis MC, Kim SH (2015) Hydrogen-bonding network and OH stretch vibration of cellulose: comparison of computational modeling with polarized IR and SFG spectra. J Phys Chem B 119:15138–15149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leppänen K, Andersson S, Torkkeli M, Knaapila M, Kotelnikova N, Serimaa R (2009) Structure of cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from various wood species, cotton and flax studied by X-ray scattering. Cellulose 16:999–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang CY, Marchessault RH (1959) Infrared spectra of crystalline polysaccharides. I. Hydrogen bonds in native celluloses. J Polym Sci 37:385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liland KH, Almoy T, Mevik BH (2010) Optimal choice of baseline correction for multivariate calibration of spectra. Appl Spectrosc 64:1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindh EL, Bergenstråhle-Wohlert M, Terenzi C, Salmén L, Furó I (2016a) Non-exchanging hydroxyl groups on the surface of cellulose fibrils: the role of interaction with water. Carbohydr Res 434:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindh EL, Stilbs P, Furó I (2016b) Site-resolved 2H relaxation experiments in solid materials by global line-shape analysis of MAS NMR spectra. J Magn Reson 268:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindman B, Karlström G, Stigsson L (2010) On the mechanism of dissolution of cellulose. J Mol Liq 156:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann J, Marrinan HJ (1956a) The reaction between cellulose and heavy water. Part 1. A qualitative study by infra-red spectroscopy. Trans Faraday Soc 52:481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann J, Marrinan HJ (1956b) The reaction between cellulose and heavy water. Part 2.—measurement of absolute accessibility and crystallinity. Trans Faraday Soc 52:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mann J, Marrinan HJ (1956c) The reaction between cellulose and heavy water. Part 3.—a quantitative study by infra-red spectroscopy. Trans Faraday Soc 52:492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maréchal Y, Chanzy H (2000) The hydrogen bond network in I-beta cellulose as observed by infrared spectrometry. J Mol Struct 523:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martins MA, Teixeira EM, Correa AC, Ferreira M, Mattoso LHC (2011) Extraction and characterization of cellulose whiskers from commercial cotton fibers. J Mater Sci 46:7858–7864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Max JJ, Chapados C (2009) Isotope effects in liquid water by infrared spectroscopy. III. H2O and D2O spectra from 6000 to 0 cm−1. J Chem Phys 131:184505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nishiyama Y (2009) Structure and properties of the cellulose microfibril. J Wood Sci 55:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nishiyama Y, Isogai A, Okano T, Muller M, Chanzy H (1999) Intracrystalline deuteration of native cellulase. Macromolecules 32:2078–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose 1 beta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nishiyama Y, Johnson GP, French AD, Forsyth VT, Langan P (2008) Neutron crystallography, molecular dynamics, and quantum mechanics studies of the nature of hydrogen bonding in cellulose I-beta. Biomacromolecules 9:3133–3140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Okubayashi S, Griesser UJ, Bechtold T (2004) A kinetic study of moisture sorption and desorption on lyocell fibers. Carbohydr Polym 58:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olivero JJ, Longbothum RL (1977) Empirical fits to the Voigt line width: a brief review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 17:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pimentel CG, McClellan LA (1960) The hydrogen bond. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Pönni R, Vuorinen T, Kontturi E (2012) Proposed nano-scale coalescence of cellulose in chemical pulp fibers during technical treatments. BioResources 7:6077–6108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Priest DJ, Shimell RJ (1963) Determination of the accessibility of cellulose films by infra-red spectroscopy. J Appl Chem 13:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reishofer D, Spirk S (2016) Deuterium and cellulose: a comprehensive review. Adv Polym Sci 271:93–114Google Scholar
  52. Salmén L, Bergström E (2009) Cellulose structural arrangement in relation to spectral changes in tensile loading FTIR. Cellulose 16:975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salmén L, Fahlén J (2006) Reflections on the ultrastructure of softwood fibers. Cellul Chem Technol 40:181–185Google Scholar
  54. Schreier F (2011) Optimized implementations of rational approximations for the Voigt and complex error function. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 112:1010–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwanninger M, Rodrigues JC, Pereira H, Hinterstoisser B (2004) Effects of short-time vibratory ball milling on the shape of FT-IR spectra of wood and cellulose. Vib Spectrosc 36:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tashiro K, Kobayashi M (1991) Theoretical evaluation of 3-dimensional elastic-constants of native and regenerated celluloses: role of hydrogen-bonds. Polymer 32:1516–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas LH, Forsyth VT, Šturcová A, Kennedy CJ, May RP, Altaner CM, Apperley DC, Wess TJ, Jarvis MC (2013) Structure of cellulose microfibrils in primary cell walls from collenchyma. Plant Physiol 161:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsuboi M (1957) Infrared spectrum and crystal structure of cellulose. J Polym Sci 25:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Venyaminov SY, Prendergast FG (1997) Water (H2O and D2O) molar absorptivity in the 1000–4000 cm−1 range and quantitative infrared spectroscopy of aqueous solutions. Anal Biochem 248:234–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wickholm K, Larsson PT, Iversen T (1998) Assignment of non-crystalline forms in cellulose I by CP/MAS 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 312:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiley JH, Atalla RH (1987) Band assignments in the raman spectra of celluloses. Carbohydr Res 160:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xie Y, Hill CS, Jalaludin Z, Curling S, Anandjiwala R, Norton A, Newman G (2011a) The dynamic water vapour sorption behaviour of natural fibres and kinetic analysis using the parallel exponential kinetics model. J Mater Sci 46:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xie YJ, Hill CAS, Jalaludin Z, Sun DY (2011b) The water vapour sorption behaviour of three celluloses: analysis using parallel exponential kinetics and interpretation using the Kelvin–Voigt viscoelastic model. Cellulose 18:517–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Applied Physical Chemistry, Department of ChemistryKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Wallenberg Wood Science CenterKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Innventia ABStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations