Preparation and adsorption properties of aerocellulose-derived activated carbon monoliths
- 577 Downloads
Activated carbon was prepared from cellulose-based aerogel (aerocellulose) monoliths by carbonization and subsequent CO2 activation. The monolithic structure of the as-synthesized aerocellulose was retained during the carbonization and activation processes. The as-synthesized aerocellulose monolith was mainly mesoporous with well-developed surface area, large total pore volume, with only moderate CO2 uptake. In order to enhance CO2 adsorption, microporosity of carbonized aerocellulose was increased upon CO2 activation. The resulting activated carbon showed an enhanced specific surface area of ~750 m2 g−1, total pore volume of 0.43 cm3 g−1, and volume of micropores (pore widths <2 nm) of ~0.27 cm3 g−1. Activation of carbonized aerocellulose resulted in about five-fold increase in the specific surface area and over 27-fold increase in the volume of micropores as compared to the as-synthesized material. The resulting activated carbon showed excellent adsorption properties toward CO2 reaching 5.8 mmol g−1 of CO2 at 0 °C and 1 atm and 3.7 mmol g−1 of CO2 at 25 °C and 1.2 atm. High microporosity and surface area of the activated aerocellulose-derived carbon combined with its biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-toxicity, low cost, and good thermal stability makes this material beneficial for CO2 capture at ambient temperatures.
KeywordsBiopolymers Cellulose Aerogels Sol–gel process CO2 sorption
The authors would like to thank Texas Department of Agriculture and Texas Tech University for partial financial support for this project. Texas Tech University manuscript number T-4-693. Authors would also like to thanks Dr. Yang Hu in the Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute at Texas Tech University for conducting SEM imaging experiments.
- Burchell MJ, Graham G, Kearsley A (2006) Cosmic dust collection in aerogel. In: Annual review of earth and planetary sciences. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 34:385–418Google Scholar
- Gebald C, Wurzbacher JA, Borgschulte A, Zimmermann T, Steinfeld A (2014) Single-component and binary CO2 and H2O adsorption of amine-functionalized cellulose. Environ Sci Technol 48(4):2497–2504Google Scholar
- Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, Linden PJVD, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–900Google Scholar
- Takahashi T (2000) Adsorption of N-methylcarbamates on Membrane Filters. Report-Hokkaido Institute of Public Health 50:75–77Google Scholar
- Yazaydın AÖ, Snurr RQ, Park T-H, Koh K, Liu J, LeVan MD, Benin AI, Jakubczak P, Lanuza M, Galloway DB, Low JJ, Willis RR (2009) Screening of metal−organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. J Am Chem Soc 131(51):18198–18199CrossRefGoogle Scholar